非外伤性慢性颈部疼痛患者的头颈动觉敏感性和姿势平衡——一项初步研究。

Per J Palmgren, Daniel Andreasson, Magnus Eriksson, Andreas Hägglund
{"title":"非外伤性慢性颈部疼痛患者的头颈动觉敏感性和姿势平衡——一项初步研究。","authors":"Per J Palmgren,&nbsp;Daniel Andreasson,&nbsp;Magnus Eriksson,&nbsp;Andreas Hägglund","doi":"10.1186/1746-1340-17-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although cervical pain is widespread, most victims are only mildly and occasionally affected. A minority, however, suffer chronic pain and/or functional impairments. Although there is abundant literature regarding nontraumatic neck pain, little focuses on diagnostic criteria. During the last decade, research on neck pain has been designed to evaluate underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, without noteworthy success. Independent researchers have investigated postural balance and cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility among patients with chronic neck pain, and have (in most cases) concluded the source of the problem is a reduced ability in the neck's proprioceptive system. Here, we investigated cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and postural balance among patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ours was a two-group, observational pilot study of patients with complaints of continuous neck pain during the 3 months prior to recruitment. Thirteen patients with chronic neck pain of nontraumatic origin were recruited from an institutional outpatient clinic. Sixteen healthy persons were recruited as a control group. Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility was assessed by exploring head repositioning accuracy and postural balance was measured with computerized static posturography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parameters of cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility were not reduced. However, in one of six test movements (flexion), global repositioning errors were significantly larger in the experimental group than in the control group (p < .05). Measurements did not demonstrate any general impaired postural balance, and varied substantially among participants in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain, we found statistically significant global repositioning errors in only one of six test movements. In this cohort, we found no evidence of impaired postural balance.Head repositioning accuracy and computerized static posturography are imperfect measures of functional proprioceptive impairments. Validity of (and procedures for using) these instruments demand further investigation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN96873990.</p>","PeriodicalId":87173,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","volume":"17 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-17-6","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and postural balance in patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain--a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Per J Palmgren,&nbsp;Daniel Andreasson,&nbsp;Magnus Eriksson,&nbsp;Andreas Hägglund\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1746-1340-17-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although cervical pain is widespread, most victims are only mildly and occasionally affected. A minority, however, suffer chronic pain and/or functional impairments. Although there is abundant literature regarding nontraumatic neck pain, little focuses on diagnostic criteria. During the last decade, research on neck pain has been designed to evaluate underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, without noteworthy success. Independent researchers have investigated postural balance and cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility among patients with chronic neck pain, and have (in most cases) concluded the source of the problem is a reduced ability in the neck's proprioceptive system. Here, we investigated cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and postural balance among patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ours was a two-group, observational pilot study of patients with complaints of continuous neck pain during the 3 months prior to recruitment. Thirteen patients with chronic neck pain of nontraumatic origin were recruited from an institutional outpatient clinic. Sixteen healthy persons were recruited as a control group. Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility was assessed by exploring head repositioning accuracy and postural balance was measured with computerized static posturography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parameters of cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility were not reduced. However, in one of six test movements (flexion), global repositioning errors were significantly larger in the experimental group than in the control group (p < .05). Measurements did not demonstrate any general impaired postural balance, and varied substantially among participants in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain, we found statistically significant global repositioning errors in only one of six test movements. In this cohort, we found no evidence of impaired postural balance.Head repositioning accuracy and computerized static posturography are imperfect measures of functional proprioceptive impairments. Validity of (and procedures for using) these instruments demand further investigation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN96873990.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chiropractic & osteopathy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-17-6\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chiropractic & osteopathy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-17-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-17-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

背景:虽然宫颈疼痛很普遍,但大多数受害者只是轻微和偶尔受到影响。然而,少数人遭受慢性疼痛和/或功能障碍。虽然有大量的文献关于非外伤性颈部疼痛,很少关注诊断标准。在过去的十年中,对颈部疼痛的研究旨在评估潜在的病理生理机制,但没有取得显著的成功。独立研究人员调查了慢性颈部疼痛患者的体位平衡和头颈动觉敏感性,并(在大多数情况下)得出结论,问题的根源是颈部本体感觉系统的能力下降。在这里,我们研究了非外伤性慢性颈部疼痛患者的头颈动觉敏感性和姿势平衡。方法:我们的研究是一项两组观察性先导研究,研究对象是在招募前3个月抱怨持续颈部疼痛的患者。13例非外伤性慢性颈痛患者来自一家机构门诊。选取16名健康人群作为对照组。通过探索头部重新定位的准确性评估头颈动觉敏感性,用计算机静态体位仪测量体位平衡。结果:头颈动觉敏感性参数未见明显降低。然而,在六种测试运动(屈曲)中的一种中,实验组的整体重新定位误差明显大于对照组(p < 0.05)。测量结果没有显示任何一般的姿势平衡受损,两组参与者之间的差异很大。结论:在非外伤性慢性颈部疼痛患者中,我们发现在6个测试动作中只有一个有统计学意义的整体重新定位错误。在这个队列中,我们没有发现姿势平衡受损的证据。头部重新定位的准确性和计算机静态姿势照相是功能性本体感觉损伤的不完善的措施。这些仪器的有效性(和使用程序)需要进一步调查。试验注册:当前对照试验ISRCTN96873990。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and postural balance in patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain--a pilot study.

Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and postural balance in patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain--a pilot study.

Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and postural balance in patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain--a pilot study.

Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and postural balance in patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain--a pilot study.

Background: Although cervical pain is widespread, most victims are only mildly and occasionally affected. A minority, however, suffer chronic pain and/or functional impairments. Although there is abundant literature regarding nontraumatic neck pain, little focuses on diagnostic criteria. During the last decade, research on neck pain has been designed to evaluate underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, without noteworthy success. Independent researchers have investigated postural balance and cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility among patients with chronic neck pain, and have (in most cases) concluded the source of the problem is a reduced ability in the neck's proprioceptive system. Here, we investigated cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and postural balance among patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain.

Methods: Ours was a two-group, observational pilot study of patients with complaints of continuous neck pain during the 3 months prior to recruitment. Thirteen patients with chronic neck pain of nontraumatic origin were recruited from an institutional outpatient clinic. Sixteen healthy persons were recruited as a control group. Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility was assessed by exploring head repositioning accuracy and postural balance was measured with computerized static posturography.

Results: Parameters of cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility were not reduced. However, in one of six test movements (flexion), global repositioning errors were significantly larger in the experimental group than in the control group (p < .05). Measurements did not demonstrate any general impaired postural balance, and varied substantially among participants in both groups.

Conclusion: In patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain, we found statistically significant global repositioning errors in only one of six test movements. In this cohort, we found no evidence of impaired postural balance.Head repositioning accuracy and computerized static posturography are imperfect measures of functional proprioceptive impairments. Validity of (and procedures for using) these instruments demand further investigation.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN96873990.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信