关于社会关系的本质、模型和神经基础。

Frans van Winden, Mirre Stallen, K Richard Ridderinkhof
{"title":"关于社会关系的本质、模型和神经基础。","authors":"Frans van Winden,&nbsp;Mirre Stallen,&nbsp;K Richard Ridderinkhof","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This chapter addresses the nature, formalization, and neural bases of (affective) social ties and discusses the relevance of ties for health economics. A social tie is defined as an affective weight attached by an individual to the well-being of another individual ('utility interdependence'). Ties can be positive or negative, and symmetric or asymmetric between individuals. Characteristic of a social tie, as conceived of here, is that it develops over time under the influence of interaction, in contrast with a trait like altruism. Moreover, a tie is not related to strategic behavior such as reputation formation but seen as generated by affective responses.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>A formalization is presented together with some supportive evidence from behavioral experiments. This is followed by a discussion of related psychological constructs and the presentation of suggestive existing neural findings. To help prepare the grounds for a model-based neural analysis some speculations on the neural networks involved are provided, together with suggestions for future research.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Social ties are not only found to be important from an economic viewpoint, it is also shown that they can be modeled and related to neural substrates.</p><p><strong>Originality/value of the chapter: </strong>By providing an overview of the economic research on social ties and connecting it with the broader behavioral and neuroeconomics literature, the chapter may contribute to the development of a neuroeconomics of social ties.</p>","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"20 ","pages":"125-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the nature, modeling, and neural bases of social ties.\",\"authors\":\"Frans van Winden,&nbsp;Mirre Stallen,&nbsp;K Richard Ridderinkhof\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This chapter addresses the nature, formalization, and neural bases of (affective) social ties and discusses the relevance of ties for health economics. A social tie is defined as an affective weight attached by an individual to the well-being of another individual ('utility interdependence'). Ties can be positive or negative, and symmetric or asymmetric between individuals. Characteristic of a social tie, as conceived of here, is that it develops over time under the influence of interaction, in contrast with a trait like altruism. Moreover, a tie is not related to strategic behavior such as reputation formation but seen as generated by affective responses.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>A formalization is presented together with some supportive evidence from behavioral experiments. This is followed by a discussion of related psychological constructs and the presentation of suggestive existing neural findings. To help prepare the grounds for a model-based neural analysis some speculations on the neural networks involved are provided, together with suggestions for future research.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Social ties are not only found to be important from an economic viewpoint, it is also shown that they can be modeled and related to neural substrates.</p><p><strong>Originality/value of the chapter: </strong>By providing an overview of the economic research on social ties and connecting it with the broader behavioral and neuroeconomics literature, the chapter may contribute to the development of a neuroeconomics of social ties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in health economics and health services research\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"125-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in health economics and health services research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in health economics and health services research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本章讨论(情感)社会关系的性质、形式化和神经基础,并讨论关系与卫生经济学的相关性。社会关系被定义为一个人对另一个人的幸福所附加的情感重量(“效用相互依赖”)。关系可以是积极的也可以是消极的,个人之间可以是对称的也可以是不对称的。社会关系的特征,正如这里所设想的那样,是在相互作用的影响下随着时间的推移而发展的,与利他主义等特征相反。此外,领带与声誉形成等战略行为无关,而是由情感反应产生的。方法论/方法:一种形式化的方法与来自行为实验的一些支持性证据一起提出。接下来是对相关心理构念的讨论和现有神经学发现的提示。为了为基于模型的神经网络分析奠定基础,本文对所涉及的神经网络进行了一些推测,并对未来的研究提出了建议。研究发现:社会关系不仅从经济角度来看是重要的,而且还表明它们可以建模并与神经基质相关。本章的独创性/价值:通过对社会关系的经济研究进行概述,并将其与更广泛的行为和神经经济学文献联系起来,本章可能有助于社会关系神经经济学的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the nature, modeling, and neural bases of social ties.

Purpose: This chapter addresses the nature, formalization, and neural bases of (affective) social ties and discusses the relevance of ties for health economics. A social tie is defined as an affective weight attached by an individual to the well-being of another individual ('utility interdependence'). Ties can be positive or negative, and symmetric or asymmetric between individuals. Characteristic of a social tie, as conceived of here, is that it develops over time under the influence of interaction, in contrast with a trait like altruism. Moreover, a tie is not related to strategic behavior such as reputation formation but seen as generated by affective responses.

Methodology/approach: A formalization is presented together with some supportive evidence from behavioral experiments. This is followed by a discussion of related psychological constructs and the presentation of suggestive existing neural findings. To help prepare the grounds for a model-based neural analysis some speculations on the neural networks involved are provided, together with suggestions for future research.

Findings: Social ties are not only found to be important from an economic viewpoint, it is also shown that they can be modeled and related to neural substrates.

Originality/value of the chapter: By providing an overview of the economic research on social ties and connecting it with the broader behavioral and neuroeconomics literature, the chapter may contribute to the development of a neuroeconomics of social ties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信