腰椎稳定运动能减轻复发性腰痛患者的疼痛和残疾吗?

Rob J.E.M. Smeets
{"title":"腰椎稳定运动能减轻复发性腰痛患者的疼痛和残疾吗?","authors":"Rob J.E.M. Smeets","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70046-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Does a graded exercise program emphasising lumbar stabilising exercises reduce pain and disability at 12 months, compared with a walking program, for patients with recurrent low back pain?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>A single private physiotherapy clinic in Sweden.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>71 patients with recurrent mechanical low back pain (&gt; 8 weeks duration, with at least 1 pain-free period during the past year) and without leg pain were allocated to one of two groups, using a concealed allocation process. The groups were comparable at baseline with respect to age, sex, proportion of participants who had sought care for back pain, and pain duration (approximately 10 years).</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>The graded exercise program and the walking program were both 8 weeks’ duration. The exercise program was individually supervised by a physiotherapist weekly for 45 minutes. In the walking program, patients met with a physiotherapist for 45 minutes in week 1 and again in week 8. The exercise program consisted primarily of stabilising exercises for the lumbar spine, commencing with re-learning activation of the transversus abdominis and multifidus muscles, with assistance of a pressure biofeedfack cuff. Exercises were progressed according to clinical judgement, pain levels, and movement control and quality. Progression entailed incorporation of muscle activation in upright positions and during functional activities. Continued implementation of the exercises in daily life was encouraged. The reference group were instructed to walk for 30 minutes daily at the fastest pace that did not aggravate pain. Walking compliance was monitored with a self-completed daily diary.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>The primary outcomes were perceived pain and disability at 12 months, measured by self-completed questionnaires returned by post. Disability was measured with the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (scale 0–100, where 100 = maximum disability). Pain was measured with 100-mm visual analogue scale (where 100 = worst pain imaginable).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At 12 months 86% of patients were followed up. At this time there was no clinically-important difference between the groups with respect to median (IQR) change in pain: exercise group –12 (–34 to –3); walking group –12 (–22 to 0). For disability at 12 months, the between-group difference in median scores was 8 on the Oswestry score: exercise group –10 (–20 to –2); walking group –2 (–12 to 2).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Lumbar stabilising exercises appear to have a similar effect on pain and disability for patients with recurrent low back pain as a daily walking program.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"55 2","pages":"Page 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70046-7","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do lumbar stabilising exercises reduce pain and disability in patients with recurrent low back pain?\",\"authors\":\"Rob J.E.M. Smeets\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70046-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Does a graded exercise program emphasising lumbar stabilising exercises reduce pain and disability at 12 months, compared with a walking program, for patients with recurrent low back pain?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>A single private physiotherapy clinic in Sweden.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>71 patients with recurrent mechanical low back pain (&gt; 8 weeks duration, with at least 1 pain-free period during the past year) and without leg pain were allocated to one of two groups, using a concealed allocation process. The groups were comparable at baseline with respect to age, sex, proportion of participants who had sought care for back pain, and pain duration (approximately 10 years).</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>The graded exercise program and the walking program were both 8 weeks’ duration. The exercise program was individually supervised by a physiotherapist weekly for 45 minutes. In the walking program, patients met with a physiotherapist for 45 minutes in week 1 and again in week 8. The exercise program consisted primarily of stabilising exercises for the lumbar spine, commencing with re-learning activation of the transversus abdominis and multifidus muscles, with assistance of a pressure biofeedfack cuff. Exercises were progressed according to clinical judgement, pain levels, and movement control and quality. Progression entailed incorporation of muscle activation in upright positions and during functional activities. Continued implementation of the exercises in daily life was encouraged. The reference group were instructed to walk for 30 minutes daily at the fastest pace that did not aggravate pain. Walking compliance was monitored with a self-completed daily diary.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>The primary outcomes were perceived pain and disability at 12 months, measured by self-completed questionnaires returned by post. Disability was measured with the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (scale 0–100, where 100 = maximum disability). Pain was measured with 100-mm visual analogue scale (where 100 = worst pain imaginable).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At 12 months 86% of patients were followed up. At this time there was no clinically-important difference between the groups with respect to median (IQR) change in pain: exercise group –12 (–34 to –3); walking group –12 (–22 to 0). For disability at 12 months, the between-group difference in median scores was 8 on the Oswestry score: exercise group –10 (–20 to –2); walking group –2 (–12 to 2).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Lumbar stabilising exercises appear to have a similar effect on pain and disability for patients with recurrent low back pain as a daily walking program.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"Page 138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70046-7\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

问题:对于复发性腰痛患者,与步行锻炼相比,强调腰椎稳定锻炼的分级锻炼计划能否在12个月时减轻疼痛和残疾?随机对照试验。瑞典一家私人理疗诊所。参与者71例复发性机械性腰痛患者(>持续时间为8周,在过去一年中至少有1个无痛期)且没有腿部疼痛的患者被分配到两组中的一组,采用隐蔽分配过程。两组在年龄、性别、因背痛寻求治疗的参与者比例和疼痛持续时间(约10年)方面具有可比性。干预措施分级运动计划和步行计划均为8周时间。锻炼计划由物理治疗师每周单独监督45分钟。在步行项目中,患者在第1周和第8周分别与物理治疗师见面45分钟。锻炼计划主要包括腰椎的稳定锻炼,在压力生物反馈袖带的帮助下,从腹横肌和多裂肌的重新学习激活开始。根据临床判断、疼痛程度、运动控制和质量进行锻炼。在直立位置和功能活动期间,进展涉及肌肉激活的结合。鼓励在日常生活中继续进行这些练习。参照组被要求每天以不加重疼痛的最快速度步行30分钟。通过自行完成的每日日记监测步行依从性。主要结果是12个月时的感知疼痛和残疾,通过邮寄的自填问卷进行测量。用Oswestry残疾问卷(0-100分,其中100 =最大残疾)测量残疾。疼痛以100毫米视觉模拟量表测量(其中100 =可想象的最严重疼痛)。结果12个月随访率为86%。此时,两组之间在疼痛中位数(IQR)变化方面没有重要的临床差异:运动组-12(-34至-3);步行组-12(-22至0)。对于12个月时残疾,Oswestry评分中位数组间差异为8分:运动组-10(-20至-2);结论腰椎稳定运动对复发性腰痛患者的疼痛和残疾的影响与日常步行计划相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do lumbar stabilising exercises reduce pain and disability in patients with recurrent low back pain?

Question

Does a graded exercise program emphasising lumbar stabilising exercises reduce pain and disability at 12 months, compared with a walking program, for patients with recurrent low back pain?

Design

Randomised controlled trial.

Setting

A single private physiotherapy clinic in Sweden.

Participants

71 patients with recurrent mechanical low back pain (> 8 weeks duration, with at least 1 pain-free period during the past year) and without leg pain were allocated to one of two groups, using a concealed allocation process. The groups were comparable at baseline with respect to age, sex, proportion of participants who had sought care for back pain, and pain duration (approximately 10 years).

Interventions

The graded exercise program and the walking program were both 8 weeks’ duration. The exercise program was individually supervised by a physiotherapist weekly for 45 minutes. In the walking program, patients met with a physiotherapist for 45 minutes in week 1 and again in week 8. The exercise program consisted primarily of stabilising exercises for the lumbar spine, commencing with re-learning activation of the transversus abdominis and multifidus muscles, with assistance of a pressure biofeedfack cuff. Exercises were progressed according to clinical judgement, pain levels, and movement control and quality. Progression entailed incorporation of muscle activation in upright positions and during functional activities. Continued implementation of the exercises in daily life was encouraged. The reference group were instructed to walk for 30 minutes daily at the fastest pace that did not aggravate pain. Walking compliance was monitored with a self-completed daily diary.

Outcomes

The primary outcomes were perceived pain and disability at 12 months, measured by self-completed questionnaires returned by post. Disability was measured with the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (scale 0–100, where 100 = maximum disability). Pain was measured with 100-mm visual analogue scale (where 100 = worst pain imaginable).

Results

At 12 months 86% of patients were followed up. At this time there was no clinically-important difference between the groups with respect to median (IQR) change in pain: exercise group –12 (–34 to –3); walking group –12 (–22 to 0). For disability at 12 months, the between-group difference in median scores was 8 on the Oswestry score: exercise group –10 (–20 to –2); walking group –2 (–12 to 2).

Conclusion

Lumbar stabilising exercises appear to have a similar effect on pain and disability for patients with recurrent low back pain as a daily walking program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信