B. Luna Azoulay, A. Béquignon, E. Babin, S. Moreau
{"title":"经皮气管切开术的初步结果","authors":"B. Luna Azoulay, A. Béquignon, E. Babin, S. Moreau","doi":"10.1016/j.aorl.2009.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Percutaneous tracheotomy (PT) is an alternative to surgical tracheotomy (ST). We describe our procedure and discuss the current status of PT through a retrospective study of our first 30 cases.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Thirty patients had a PT between October 2006 and March 2008 in the intensive care units of Caen University Hospital (France). Twenty-eight were done with the Ciaglia Blue Rhino (CBR) and two with the Percutwist. Each PT was endoscopically guided. We retrospectively collected preoperative data and most of the intraoperative as well as early postoperative complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No death was reported with the PT application. Twenty-two (73.3%) PTs had neither preoperative nor early postoperative complications. Eight complications were observed, half preoperative and half early postoperative. The most frequent complication was minor bleeding in three cases (10%), the most important one was the intraoperative appearance of a tracheoesophageal fistula with the CBR.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The principal advantages of PT are safety attributable to simultaneous endoscopic guidance as well as shorter operative time and lower cost in comparison with the ST technique.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PT is a safe and valid alternative procedure to ST. Initially performed by intensivists, it should be part of the ENT/head and neck surgeon's repertory as the upper airway specialist.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75509,"journal":{"name":"Annales d'oto-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico faciale : bulletin de la Societe d'oto-laryngologie des hopitaux de Paris","volume":"126 3","pages":"Pages 125-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aorl.2009.04.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Résultats préliminaires des trachéotomies percutanées\",\"authors\":\"B. Luna Azoulay, A. Béquignon, E. Babin, S. Moreau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aorl.2009.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Percutaneous tracheotomy (PT) is an alternative to surgical tracheotomy (ST). We describe our procedure and discuss the current status of PT through a retrospective study of our first 30 cases.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Thirty patients had a PT between October 2006 and March 2008 in the intensive care units of Caen University Hospital (France). Twenty-eight were done with the Ciaglia Blue Rhino (CBR) and two with the Percutwist. Each PT was endoscopically guided. We retrospectively collected preoperative data and most of the intraoperative as well as early postoperative complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No death was reported with the PT application. Twenty-two (73.3%) PTs had neither preoperative nor early postoperative complications. Eight complications were observed, half preoperative and half early postoperative. The most frequent complication was minor bleeding in three cases (10%), the most important one was the intraoperative appearance of a tracheoesophageal fistula with the CBR.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The principal advantages of PT are safety attributable to simultaneous endoscopic guidance as well as shorter operative time and lower cost in comparison with the ST technique.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PT is a safe and valid alternative procedure to ST. Initially performed by intensivists, it should be part of the ENT/head and neck surgeon's repertory as the upper airway specialist.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales d'oto-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico faciale : bulletin de la Societe d'oto-laryngologie des hopitaux de Paris\",\"volume\":\"126 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 125-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aorl.2009.04.002\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales d'oto-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico faciale : bulletin de la Societe d'oto-laryngologie des hopitaux de Paris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003438X09000747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales d'oto-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico faciale : bulletin de la Societe d'oto-laryngologie des hopitaux de Paris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003438X09000747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目的经皮气管切开术(PT)是外科气管切开术(ST)的替代方法。我们通过对前30例病例的回顾性研究,描述了我们的手术过程,并讨论了PT的现状。材料与方法2006年10月至2008年3月在法国卡昂大学医院重症监护室接受PT治疗的30例患者。28例是用Ciaglia Blue Rhino (CBR)完成的,2例是用Percutwist完成的。每个PT都在内窥镜引导下。我们回顾性地收集了术前资料和大部分术中及术后早期并发症。结果PT应用无死亡报告。22例(73.3%)患者术前和术后早期均无并发症。共观察到8例并发症,术前一半,术后早期一半。最常见的并发症是3例(10%)的小出血,最重要的并发症是术中出现的气管食管瘘伴CBR。与ST技术相比,PT技术的主要优点是安全,同时内镜引导,手术时间短,成本低。结论pt是st的一种安全有效的替代方法,最初由重症医师进行,应成为耳鼻喉科/头颈部外科医生作为上呼吸道专科医生的一部分。
Résultats préliminaires des trachéotomies percutanées
Objectives
Percutaneous tracheotomy (PT) is an alternative to surgical tracheotomy (ST). We describe our procedure and discuss the current status of PT through a retrospective study of our first 30 cases.
Material and methods
Thirty patients had a PT between October 2006 and March 2008 in the intensive care units of Caen University Hospital (France). Twenty-eight were done with the Ciaglia Blue Rhino (CBR) and two with the Percutwist. Each PT was endoscopically guided. We retrospectively collected preoperative data and most of the intraoperative as well as early postoperative complications.
Results
No death was reported with the PT application. Twenty-two (73.3%) PTs had neither preoperative nor early postoperative complications. Eight complications were observed, half preoperative and half early postoperative. The most frequent complication was minor bleeding in three cases (10%), the most important one was the intraoperative appearance of a tracheoesophageal fistula with the CBR.
Discussion
The principal advantages of PT are safety attributable to simultaneous endoscopic guidance as well as shorter operative time and lower cost in comparison with the ST technique.
Conclusion
PT is a safe and valid alternative procedure to ST. Initially performed by intensivists, it should be part of the ENT/head and neck surgeon's repertory as the upper airway specialist.