参与运动项目的非特异性慢性腰痛患者对运动的偏好:一项定性研究

Susan C. Slade, Elizabeth Molloy, Jennifer L. Keating
{"title":"参与运动项目的非特异性慢性腰痛患者对运动的偏好:一项定性研究","authors":"Susan C. Slade,&nbsp;Elizabeth Molloy,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Keating","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70041-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>What factors do participants in exercise programs for chronic low back pain perceive to be important for engagement and participation?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Qualitative study of three focus groups.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>18 adults with chronic low back pain who had participated in exercise programs for chronic low back pain.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All focus group results concurred and two significant themes emerged from the focus group data. The first was that the experience of exercise informed participant preferences with respect to exercise environment and type of exercise. Participants described a range of positive and negative experiences, a desire to master exercise techniques, and a preference for exercise that matched their abilities and prior skills. The second significant theme was the helpful and empowering skills of the care-provider, and care-seeker ability to identify and articulate their own needs. Participants regarded carer expertise favourably when positive results were achieved early in the interaction, but were frustrated when they were not listened to and symptoms were aggravated. The relationship was enhanced by effective communication. Participants also recognised they needed to be aware of their own skills and abilities and, and that financial or family support incentives encouraged their adherence to a program.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>People are likely to prefer and participate in exercise programs that are designed with consideration of their preferences, circumstances, and past exercise experiences. We propose that information about patient exercise preferences should be collected systematically.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"55 2","pages":"Pages 115-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70041-8","citationCount":"85","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"People with non-specific chronic low back pain who have participated in exercise programs have preferences about exercise: a qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Susan C. Slade,&nbsp;Elizabeth Molloy,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Keating\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70041-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>What factors do participants in exercise programs for chronic low back pain perceive to be important for engagement and participation?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Qualitative study of three focus groups.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>18 adults with chronic low back pain who had participated in exercise programs for chronic low back pain.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All focus group results concurred and two significant themes emerged from the focus group data. The first was that the experience of exercise informed participant preferences with respect to exercise environment and type of exercise. Participants described a range of positive and negative experiences, a desire to master exercise techniques, and a preference for exercise that matched their abilities and prior skills. The second significant theme was the helpful and empowering skills of the care-provider, and care-seeker ability to identify and articulate their own needs. Participants regarded carer expertise favourably when positive results were achieved early in the interaction, but were frustrated when they were not listened to and symptoms were aggravated. The relationship was enhanced by effective communication. Participants also recognised they needed to be aware of their own skills and abilities and, and that financial or family support incentives encouraged their adherence to a program.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>People are likely to prefer and participate in exercise programs that are designed with consideration of their preferences, circumstances, and past exercise experiences. We propose that information about patient exercise preferences should be collected systematically.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 115-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70041-8\",\"citationCount\":\"85\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

摘要

问题:慢性腰痛运动项目的参与者认为哪些因素对参与和参与很重要?设计三个焦点群体的定性研究。参与者是18名患有慢性腰痛的成年人,他们参加了针对慢性腰痛的锻炼项目。结果所有焦点小组的结果一致,从焦点小组的数据中出现了两个重要的主题。首先,运动的经历告诉了参与者对运动环境和运动类型的偏好。参与者描述了一系列积极和消极的经历,对掌握锻炼技巧的渴望,以及对与他们的能力和先前技能相匹配的锻炼的偏好。第二个重要主题是护理提供者的有益和赋权技能,以及寻求护理者识别和阐明其自身需求的能力。当在早期互动中取得积极成果时,参与者对护理人员的专业知识持积极态度,但当他们没有被倾听并且症状加重时,他们会感到沮丧。有效的沟通增进了这种关系。参与者还认识到,他们需要了解自己的技能和能力,并且经济或家庭支持奖励鼓励他们坚持项目。结论:人们可能更喜欢并参与考虑到他们的偏好、环境和过去的运动经验而设计的运动项目。我们建议系统地收集有关患者运动偏好的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
People with non-specific chronic low back pain who have participated in exercise programs have preferences about exercise: a qualitative study

Question

What factors do participants in exercise programs for chronic low back pain perceive to be important for engagement and participation?

Design

Qualitative study of three focus groups.

Participants

18 adults with chronic low back pain who had participated in exercise programs for chronic low back pain.

Results

All focus group results concurred and two significant themes emerged from the focus group data. The first was that the experience of exercise informed participant preferences with respect to exercise environment and type of exercise. Participants described a range of positive and negative experiences, a desire to master exercise techniques, and a preference for exercise that matched their abilities and prior skills. The second significant theme was the helpful and empowering skills of the care-provider, and care-seeker ability to identify and articulate their own needs. Participants regarded carer expertise favourably when positive results were achieved early in the interaction, but were frustrated when they were not listened to and symptoms were aggravated. The relationship was enhanced by effective communication. Participants also recognised they needed to be aware of their own skills and abilities and, and that financial or family support incentives encouraged their adherence to a program.

Conclusion

People are likely to prefer and participate in exercise programs that are designed with consideration of their preferences, circumstances, and past exercise experiences. We propose that information about patient exercise preferences should be collected systematically.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信