Aline Scianni , Jane M. Butler , Louise Ada , Luci F. Teixeira-Salmela
{"title":"肌肉强化对患有脑瘫的儿童和青少年无效:一项系统综述","authors":"Aline Scianni , Jane M. Butler , Louise Ada , Luci F. Teixeira-Salmela","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70037-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Do strengthening interventions increase strength without increasing spasticity and improve activity, and is there any carryover after cessation in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Children with spastic cerebral palsy between school age and 20 years.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Strengthening interventions that involved repetitive, strong, or effortful muscle contractions and progressed as ability changed, such as biofeedback, electrical stimulation, and progressive resistance exercise.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>Strength was measured as continuous measures of maximum voluntary force or torque production. Spasticity was measured as velocity-dependent resistance to passive stretch. Activity was measured as continuous measures, eg, 10-m Walk Test, or using scales eg, the Gross Motor Function Measure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six studies were identified and five had data that could be included in a metaanalysis. Strengthening interventions had no effect on strength (SMD 0.20, 95% CI −0.17 to 0.56), no effect on walking speed (MD 0.02 m/s, 95% CI −0.13 to 0.16), and had a small statistically-significant but not clinically-worthwhile effect on Gross Motor Function Measure (MD 2%, 95% CI 0 to 4). Only one study measured spasticity but did not report the between-group analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In children and adolescents with cerebral palsy who are walking, the current evidence suggests that strengthening interventions are neither effective nor worthwhile.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"55 2","pages":"Pages 81-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70037-6","citationCount":"181","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muscle strengthening is not effective in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Aline Scianni , Jane M. Butler , Louise Ada , Luci F. Teixeira-Salmela\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70037-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Do strengthening interventions increase strength without increasing spasticity and improve activity, and is there any carryover after cessation in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Children with spastic cerebral palsy between school age and 20 years.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Strengthening interventions that involved repetitive, strong, or effortful muscle contractions and progressed as ability changed, such as biofeedback, electrical stimulation, and progressive resistance exercise.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>Strength was measured as continuous measures of maximum voluntary force or torque production. Spasticity was measured as velocity-dependent resistance to passive stretch. Activity was measured as continuous measures, eg, 10-m Walk Test, or using scales eg, the Gross Motor Function Measure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six studies were identified and five had data that could be included in a metaanalysis. Strengthening interventions had no effect on strength (SMD 0.20, 95% CI −0.17 to 0.56), no effect on walking speed (MD 0.02 m/s, 95% CI −0.13 to 0.16), and had a small statistically-significant but not clinically-worthwhile effect on Gross Motor Function Measure (MD 2%, 95% CI 0 to 4). Only one study measured spasticity but did not report the between-group analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In children and adolescents with cerebral palsy who are walking, the current evidence suggests that strengthening interventions are neither effective nor worthwhile.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 81-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70037-6\",\"citationCount\":\"181\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 181
摘要
强化干预是否能在不增加痉挛的情况下增加力量并改善活动?在脑瘫儿童和青少年中,停止干预后是否有任何延续?设计:采用随机试验的荟萃分析进行系统评价。研究对象为学龄期至20岁的痉挛性脑瘫儿童。干预:强化干预包括重复的、强烈的或费力的肌肉收缩,并随着能力的变化而逐步进行,如生物反馈、电刺激和渐进式阻力训练。结果测量:强度测量为最大自主力或扭矩产生的连续测量。痉挛性以速度依赖性被动拉伸阻力测量。通过连续测量测量活动,如10米步行测试,或使用量表,如大运动功能测量。结果确定了6项研究,其中5项研究的数据可纳入荟萃分析。强化干预对力量没有影响(SMD 0.20, 95% CI - 0.17至0.56),对步行速度没有影响(SMD 0.02 m/s, 95% CI - 0.13至0.16),对大运动功能测量有很小的统计学意义但没有临床价值的影响(SMD 2%, 95% CI 0至4)。只有一项研究测量了痉挛,但没有报告组间分析。结论对于正在行走的脑瘫儿童和青少年,目前的证据表明加强干预既不有效也不值得。
Muscle strengthening is not effective in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review
Question
Do strengthening interventions increase strength without increasing spasticity and improve activity, and is there any carryover after cessation in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy?
Design
Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Participants
Children with spastic cerebral palsy between school age and 20 years.
Intervention
Strengthening interventions that involved repetitive, strong, or effortful muscle contractions and progressed as ability changed, such as biofeedback, electrical stimulation, and progressive resistance exercise.
Outcome measures
Strength was measured as continuous measures of maximum voluntary force or torque production. Spasticity was measured as velocity-dependent resistance to passive stretch. Activity was measured as continuous measures, eg, 10-m Walk Test, or using scales eg, the Gross Motor Function Measure.
Results
Six studies were identified and five had data that could be included in a metaanalysis. Strengthening interventions had no effect on strength (SMD 0.20, 95% CI −0.17 to 0.56), no effect on walking speed (MD 0.02 m/s, 95% CI −0.13 to 0.16), and had a small statistically-significant but not clinically-worthwhile effect on Gross Motor Function Measure (MD 2%, 95% CI 0 to 4). Only one study measured spasticity but did not report the between-group analysis.
Conclusion
In children and adolescents with cerebral palsy who are walking, the current evidence suggests that strengthening interventions are neither effective nor worthwhile.