肺部康复在医院和家庭环境中同样有效

Jenny Alison
{"title":"肺部康复在医院和家庭环境中同样有效","authors":"Jenny Alison","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70062-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Is pulmonary rehabilitation with the exercise component performed at home as effective at reducing dyspnoea as outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised, controlled trial with concealed allocation.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Ten centres in Canada.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adults with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), aged at least 40 years, with an FEV<sub>1</sub> less than 70% of the predicted value, an FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ratio of less than 0.70, and a Medical Research Council dyspnoea score of 2 or more. Previous pulmonary rehabilitation was an exclusion criterion. Randomisation of 252 participants allotted 126 to each group.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Both groups received the same eight educational lectures over 4 weeks as hospital outpatients. The outpatient group then commenced combined aerobic and strength training on an outpatient basis with supervision, attending three sessions per week for 8 weeks. Each session consisted of cycle ergometry for 30 minutes at 80% of peak work capacity and progressive resistance exercises for 30 minutes. Supplemental oxygen was provided as appropriate. The other group trained at home, also for three sessions per week over the same 8 weeks. The first session was supervised, followed by weekly phone contact. Cycle ergometers were loaned to participants for the aerobic training for the 8-week period. The target intensity was 60% of peak work capacity for 40 minutes per session. The resistance exercises and oxygen supplementation were the same as for the outpatient group. Thereafter, both groups were prescribed three home exercise sessions per week for another 9 months.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was the change in the dyspnoea domain of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were other CRQ domains, the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the 6-minute walk test, an endurance cycle test, and safety.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Follow-up was 92% at 3 months and 86% at one year. The CRQ dyspnoea scores differed by 0.05 (95%CI –0.21 to 0.29) at 3 months and by 0.16 (95% CI –0.08 to 0.40) at one year. This excluded the minimum clinically important difference of 0.5, confirming that the two rehabilitation strategies had very similar effects on dyspnoea. The home-based group showed significantly better improvement on the Symptoms domain of the SGRQ at 3 months, but this difference was no longer significant at one year. On the remaining secondary outcomes, the two rehabilitation strategies had similar effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>For adults with COPD, pulmonary rehabilitation with the exercise component performed at home can be as effective as outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"55 1","pages":"Page 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70062-5","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonary rehabilitation can be equally effective in hospital and home settings\",\"authors\":\"Jenny Alison\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70062-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Is pulmonary rehabilitation with the exercise component performed at home as effective at reducing dyspnoea as outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised, controlled trial with concealed allocation.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Ten centres in Canada.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adults with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), aged at least 40 years, with an FEV<sub>1</sub> less than 70% of the predicted value, an FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ratio of less than 0.70, and a Medical Research Council dyspnoea score of 2 or more. Previous pulmonary rehabilitation was an exclusion criterion. Randomisation of 252 participants allotted 126 to each group.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Both groups received the same eight educational lectures over 4 weeks as hospital outpatients. The outpatient group then commenced combined aerobic and strength training on an outpatient basis with supervision, attending three sessions per week for 8 weeks. Each session consisted of cycle ergometry for 30 minutes at 80% of peak work capacity and progressive resistance exercises for 30 minutes. Supplemental oxygen was provided as appropriate. The other group trained at home, also for three sessions per week over the same 8 weeks. The first session was supervised, followed by weekly phone contact. Cycle ergometers were loaned to participants for the aerobic training for the 8-week period. The target intensity was 60% of peak work capacity for 40 minutes per session. The resistance exercises and oxygen supplementation were the same as for the outpatient group. Thereafter, both groups were prescribed three home exercise sessions per week for another 9 months.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was the change in the dyspnoea domain of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were other CRQ domains, the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the 6-minute walk test, an endurance cycle test, and safety.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Follow-up was 92% at 3 months and 86% at one year. The CRQ dyspnoea scores differed by 0.05 (95%CI –0.21 to 0.29) at 3 months and by 0.16 (95% CI –0.08 to 0.40) at one year. This excluded the minimum clinically important difference of 0.5, confirming that the two rehabilitation strategies had very similar effects on dyspnoea. The home-based group showed significantly better improvement on the Symptoms domain of the SGRQ at 3 months, but this difference was no longer significant at one year. On the remaining secondary outcomes, the two rehabilitation strategies had similar effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>For adults with COPD, pulmonary rehabilitation with the exercise component performed at home can be as effective as outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"Page 61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70062-5\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在家中进行的肺康复与门诊肺康复相比,在减少呼吸困难方面是否同样有效?随机对照试验,隐藏分配。加拿大有10个中心。参与者:患有稳定型慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的成年人,年龄至少40岁,FEV1小于预测值的70%,FEV1/FVC比小于0.70,医学研究委员会呼吸困难评分为2或更高。既往肺部康复为排除标准。252名参与者随机分配,每组126人。干预措施:两组患者在4周内接受了与医院门诊患者相同的8次教育讲座。门诊组在门诊病人的监督下开始有氧和力量联合训练,每周参加三次,持续8周。每次训练包括30分钟的循环几何训练和30分钟的渐进式阻力训练。适当时给予补充氧气。另一组在家训练,同样在8周内每周进行三次训练。第一次是在监督下进行的,之后是每周的电话联系。在为期8周的有氧训练中,参与者借用了自行车测力仪。目标强度为峰值工作能力的60%,每次40分钟。阻力运动和氧气补充与门诊组相同。此后,两组人都被规定在接下来的9个月里每周进行三次家庭锻炼。主要结果是12个月时慢性呼吸问卷(CRQ)呼吸困难域的变化。次要结果是其他CRQ域、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)、6分钟步行测试、耐力循环测试和安全性。结果3个月随访率为92%,1年随访率为86%。3个月时CRQ呼吸困难评分差异0.05 (95%CI -0.21 ~ 0.29), 1年时差异0.16 (95%CI -0.08 ~ 0.40)。这排除了0.5的最小临床重要差异,证实了两种康复策略对呼吸困难的影响非常相似。以家庭为基础的组在3个月时在SGRQ的症状领域表现出明显更好的改善,但在一年后这种差异不再显著。在其余次要结果上,两种康复策略具有相似的效果。结论对于成人慢性阻塞性肺病患者,在家中进行运动部分的肺康复与门诊肺康复一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulmonary rehabilitation can be equally effective in hospital and home settings

Question

Is pulmonary rehabilitation with the exercise component performed at home as effective at reducing dyspnoea as outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation?

Design

Randomised, controlled trial with concealed allocation.

Setting

Ten centres in Canada.

Participants

Adults with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), aged at least 40 years, with an FEV1 less than 70% of the predicted value, an FEV1/FVC ratio of less than 0.70, and a Medical Research Council dyspnoea score of 2 or more. Previous pulmonary rehabilitation was an exclusion criterion. Randomisation of 252 participants allotted 126 to each group.

Interventions

Both groups received the same eight educational lectures over 4 weeks as hospital outpatients. The outpatient group then commenced combined aerobic and strength training on an outpatient basis with supervision, attending three sessions per week for 8 weeks. Each session consisted of cycle ergometry for 30 minutes at 80% of peak work capacity and progressive resistance exercises for 30 minutes. Supplemental oxygen was provided as appropriate. The other group trained at home, also for three sessions per week over the same 8 weeks. The first session was supervised, followed by weekly phone contact. Cycle ergometers were loaned to participants for the aerobic training for the 8-week period. The target intensity was 60% of peak work capacity for 40 minutes per session. The resistance exercises and oxygen supplementation were the same as for the outpatient group. Thereafter, both groups were prescribed three home exercise sessions per week for another 9 months.

Outcome measures

The primary outcome was the change in the dyspnoea domain of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were other CRQ domains, the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the 6-minute walk test, an endurance cycle test, and safety.

Results

Follow-up was 92% at 3 months and 86% at one year. The CRQ dyspnoea scores differed by 0.05 (95%CI –0.21 to 0.29) at 3 months and by 0.16 (95% CI –0.08 to 0.40) at one year. This excluded the minimum clinically important difference of 0.5, confirming that the two rehabilitation strategies had very similar effects on dyspnoea. The home-based group showed significantly better improvement on the Symptoms domain of the SGRQ at 3 months, but this difference was no longer significant at one year. On the remaining secondary outcomes, the two rehabilitation strategies had similar effects.

Conclusion

For adults with COPD, pulmonary rehabilitation with the exercise component performed at home can be as effective as outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信