更多关注治疗靶点和改善高血压耐受性。

Thomas Hedner, Sverre E Kjeldsen, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Susanne Oparil
{"title":"更多关注治疗靶点和改善高血压耐受性。","authors":"Thomas Hedner, Sverre E Kjeldsen, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Susanne Oparil","doi":"10.1080/08038020802571775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During recent years, there have been increased efforts in most countries to improve management of hypertensive patients in order to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the population. According to current recommendations of management of hypertension, about three-quarters of those over the age of 65 years, more than half of those aged over 55 years, and about one-third of adults over 16 years of age are considered hypertensive (1–3). When non-pharmacological efforts are insufficient, a large proportion of the adult population will therefore, according to current guidelines, require pharmacological intervention to lower blood pressure (1–3). Numerous studies performed in many countries around the world have repetitively shown that adequate blood pressure control is achieved and maintained only in a limited proportion of the hypertensive population (1,2). Compared with those with lower blood pressure levels, treated patients with a blood pressure of 140 and/or 90 mmHg or more will be at excess cardiovascular risk and more likely to suffer negative health consequences. Poor control of hypertension therefore remains an important issue and deserves considerably more focus as well as increased efforts from the medical community. One important reason for poor hypertension control seems to be that many physicians often base antihypertensive treatment on monotherapy, although there may be a clear need for add-on therapy (4). In the current issue of Blood Pressure, the topic of combination therapy is addressed in a series of communications. Weycker et al. (5) present data from a large database survey showing the effectiveness of add-on treatment with amlodipine to obtain an improved systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduction in patients on valsartan monotherapy. Trenkwalder et al. (6), also studying amlodipine and valsartan, find that the combination lowers blood pressure in patients not controlled by an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/calcium-channel blocker combination. Nickenig and coworkers (7) find that the fixed combination of aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) more effectively lowers blood pressure in aliskiren non-responders with a similar tolerability. Börner et al. (8) describe the effectiveness of a candesartan/HCTZ combination providing an improved blood pressure reduction compared with candesartan monotherapy with maintained tolerability. Taken together, in patients with insufficient hypertension control on monotherapy with an angiotensin 1 receptor antagonist or a renin inhibitor, combination with a calcium antagonist or HCTZ will provide an improved control and a maintained tolerability. These data are in agreement with data from a previous meta-analysis (9) of a large series of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled antihypertensive combination trials, demonstrating that combination therapy improves antihypertensive efficacy as well as tolerability. Combination therapy produces an additive effect of the blood pressure lowering responses from the individual components of the first and second drugs. Importantly, in some trials, major blood pressure reductions by combination therapy have been achieved when the individual antihypertensive agents were administered at half-standard doses. Although seemingly simple to implement in most hypertension clinics, achieving target pressures in the hypertensive population remains a difficult issue. Importantly, adherence to the prescribed treatment regimen is a key determinant of the success of blood pressure control in most patient populations (10). Several known factors influence compliance with the antihypertensive lifestyle changes and drug therapy. Such factors include a high acquisition cost of drugs, complexity of the treatment regimen, patient information related to the hypertensive disease complications and the benefit of treatment. Also of importance are the availability of the physician and the ease of obtaining prescription medication. In addition to that, a Blood Pressure. 2008; 17 (Suppl 2): 3–4","PeriodicalId":8974,"journal":{"name":"Blood pressure. Supplement","volume":"2 ","pages":"3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08038020802571775","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More focus on therapeutic targets and improved tolerability in hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Hedner, Sverre E Kjeldsen, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Susanne Oparil\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08038020802571775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During recent years, there have been increased efforts in most countries to improve management of hypertensive patients in order to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the population. According to current recommendations of management of hypertension, about three-quarters of those over the age of 65 years, more than half of those aged over 55 years, and about one-third of adults over 16 years of age are considered hypertensive (1–3). When non-pharmacological efforts are insufficient, a large proportion of the adult population will therefore, according to current guidelines, require pharmacological intervention to lower blood pressure (1–3). Numerous studies performed in many countries around the world have repetitively shown that adequate blood pressure control is achieved and maintained only in a limited proportion of the hypertensive population (1,2). Compared with those with lower blood pressure levels, treated patients with a blood pressure of 140 and/or 90 mmHg or more will be at excess cardiovascular risk and more likely to suffer negative health consequences. Poor control of hypertension therefore remains an important issue and deserves considerably more focus as well as increased efforts from the medical community. One important reason for poor hypertension control seems to be that many physicians often base antihypertensive treatment on monotherapy, although there may be a clear need for add-on therapy (4). In the current issue of Blood Pressure, the topic of combination therapy is addressed in a series of communications. Weycker et al. (5) present data from a large database survey showing the effectiveness of add-on treatment with amlodipine to obtain an improved systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduction in patients on valsartan monotherapy. Trenkwalder et al. (6), also studying amlodipine and valsartan, find that the combination lowers blood pressure in patients not controlled by an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/calcium-channel blocker combination. Nickenig and coworkers (7) find that the fixed combination of aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) more effectively lowers blood pressure in aliskiren non-responders with a similar tolerability. Börner et al. (8) describe the effectiveness of a candesartan/HCTZ combination providing an improved blood pressure reduction compared with candesartan monotherapy with maintained tolerability. Taken together, in patients with insufficient hypertension control on monotherapy with an angiotensin 1 receptor antagonist or a renin inhibitor, combination with a calcium antagonist or HCTZ will provide an improved control and a maintained tolerability. These data are in agreement with data from a previous meta-analysis (9) of a large series of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled antihypertensive combination trials, demonstrating that combination therapy improves antihypertensive efficacy as well as tolerability. Combination therapy produces an additive effect of the blood pressure lowering responses from the individual components of the first and second drugs. Importantly, in some trials, major blood pressure reductions by combination therapy have been achieved when the individual antihypertensive agents were administered at half-standard doses. Although seemingly simple to implement in most hypertension clinics, achieving target pressures in the hypertensive population remains a difficult issue. Importantly, adherence to the prescribed treatment regimen is a key determinant of the success of blood pressure control in most patient populations (10). Several known factors influence compliance with the antihypertensive lifestyle changes and drug therapy. Such factors include a high acquisition cost of drugs, complexity of the treatment regimen, patient information related to the hypertensive disease complications and the benefit of treatment. Also of importance are the availability of the physician and the ease of obtaining prescription medication. In addition to that, a Blood Pressure. 2008; 17 (Suppl 2): 3–4\",\"PeriodicalId\":8974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood pressure. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"3-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08038020802571775\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood pressure. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08038020802571775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood pressure. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08038020802571775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
More focus on therapeutic targets and improved tolerability in hypertension.
During recent years, there have been increased efforts in most countries to improve management of hypertensive patients in order to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the population. According to current recommendations of management of hypertension, about three-quarters of those over the age of 65 years, more than half of those aged over 55 years, and about one-third of adults over 16 years of age are considered hypertensive (1–3). When non-pharmacological efforts are insufficient, a large proportion of the adult population will therefore, according to current guidelines, require pharmacological intervention to lower blood pressure (1–3). Numerous studies performed in many countries around the world have repetitively shown that adequate blood pressure control is achieved and maintained only in a limited proportion of the hypertensive population (1,2). Compared with those with lower blood pressure levels, treated patients with a blood pressure of 140 and/or 90 mmHg or more will be at excess cardiovascular risk and more likely to suffer negative health consequences. Poor control of hypertension therefore remains an important issue and deserves considerably more focus as well as increased efforts from the medical community. One important reason for poor hypertension control seems to be that many physicians often base antihypertensive treatment on monotherapy, although there may be a clear need for add-on therapy (4). In the current issue of Blood Pressure, the topic of combination therapy is addressed in a series of communications. Weycker et al. (5) present data from a large database survey showing the effectiveness of add-on treatment with amlodipine to obtain an improved systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduction in patients on valsartan monotherapy. Trenkwalder et al. (6), also studying amlodipine and valsartan, find that the combination lowers blood pressure in patients not controlled by an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/calcium-channel blocker combination. Nickenig and coworkers (7) find that the fixed combination of aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) more effectively lowers blood pressure in aliskiren non-responders with a similar tolerability. Börner et al. (8) describe the effectiveness of a candesartan/HCTZ combination providing an improved blood pressure reduction compared with candesartan monotherapy with maintained tolerability. Taken together, in patients with insufficient hypertension control on monotherapy with an angiotensin 1 receptor antagonist or a renin inhibitor, combination with a calcium antagonist or HCTZ will provide an improved control and a maintained tolerability. These data are in agreement with data from a previous meta-analysis (9) of a large series of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled antihypertensive combination trials, demonstrating that combination therapy improves antihypertensive efficacy as well as tolerability. Combination therapy produces an additive effect of the blood pressure lowering responses from the individual components of the first and second drugs. Importantly, in some trials, major blood pressure reductions by combination therapy have been achieved when the individual antihypertensive agents were administered at half-standard doses. Although seemingly simple to implement in most hypertension clinics, achieving target pressures in the hypertensive population remains a difficult issue. Importantly, adherence to the prescribed treatment regimen is a key determinant of the success of blood pressure control in most patient populations (10). Several known factors influence compliance with the antihypertensive lifestyle changes and drug therapy. Such factors include a high acquisition cost of drugs, complexity of the treatment regimen, patient information related to the hypertensive disease complications and the benefit of treatment. Also of importance are the availability of the physician and the ease of obtaining prescription medication. In addition to that, a Blood Pressure. 2008; 17 (Suppl 2): 3–4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信