墨西哥人工流产的估计:1990年至2006年间发生了什么变化?

Fatima Juarez, Susheela Singh, Sandra G Garcia, Claudia Diaz Olavarrieta
{"title":"墨西哥人工流产的估计:1990年至2006年间发生了什么变化?","authors":"Fatima Juarez,&nbsp;Susheela Singh,&nbsp;Sandra G Garcia,&nbsp;Claudia Diaz Olavarrieta","doi":"10.1363/ifpp.34.158.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>In Mexico, where abortion remains largely illegal and clandestine, reliable data on induced abortion and related morbidity are critical for informing policies and programs. The only available national estimate of abortion is for 1990, and demographic and socioeconomic changes since then have likely affected abortion incidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used official statistics on women treated for abortion-related complications in public hospitals in 2006 and data from a survey of informed health professionals. Indirect estimation techniques were used to calculate national and regional abortion measures, which were compared with 1990 estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2006, an estimated 150,000 women were treated for induced abortion complications in public-sector hospitals, and one in every 5.8 women having an induced abortion were estimated to have received such treatment. The estimated total number of induced abortions in 2006 was 875,000, and the abortion rate was 33 per 1,000 women aged 15-44. Between 1990 and 2006, the abortion rate increased by 33% (from a rate of 25). The severity of morbidity due to unsafe abortion declined (as seen in shorter hospital stays), but the annual rate of hospitalization did not-it was 5.4 per 1,000 women in 1990 and 5.7 in 2006. The abortion rate was similar to the national average in three regions (34-36), but substantially lower in one (25 in the South/East region).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clandestine abortion continues to negatively affect women's health in Mexico. Recommended responses include broadening the legal criteria for abortion throughout Mexico, improving contraceptive and postabortion services, and expanding training in the provision of safe abortion, including medical abortion.</p>","PeriodicalId":81537,"journal":{"name":"International family planning perspectives","volume":"34 4","pages":"158-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimates of induced abortion in Mexico: what's changed between 1990 and 2006?\",\"authors\":\"Fatima Juarez,&nbsp;Susheela Singh,&nbsp;Sandra G Garcia,&nbsp;Claudia Diaz Olavarrieta\",\"doi\":\"10.1363/ifpp.34.158.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>In Mexico, where abortion remains largely illegal and clandestine, reliable data on induced abortion and related morbidity are critical for informing policies and programs. The only available national estimate of abortion is for 1990, and demographic and socioeconomic changes since then have likely affected abortion incidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used official statistics on women treated for abortion-related complications in public hospitals in 2006 and data from a survey of informed health professionals. Indirect estimation techniques were used to calculate national and regional abortion measures, which were compared with 1990 estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2006, an estimated 150,000 women were treated for induced abortion complications in public-sector hospitals, and one in every 5.8 women having an induced abortion were estimated to have received such treatment. The estimated total number of induced abortions in 2006 was 875,000, and the abortion rate was 33 per 1,000 women aged 15-44. Between 1990 and 2006, the abortion rate increased by 33% (from a rate of 25). The severity of morbidity due to unsafe abortion declined (as seen in shorter hospital stays), but the annual rate of hospitalization did not-it was 5.4 per 1,000 women in 1990 and 5.7 in 2006. The abortion rate was similar to the national average in three regions (34-36), but substantially lower in one (25 in the South/East region).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clandestine abortion continues to negatively affect women's health in Mexico. Recommended responses include broadening the legal criteria for abortion throughout Mexico, improving contraceptive and postabortion services, and expanding training in the provision of safe abortion, including medical abortion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International family planning perspectives\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"158-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International family planning perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1363/ifpp.34.158.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International family planning perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/ifpp.34.158.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在墨西哥,堕胎在很大程度上仍然是非法和秘密的,关于人工流产和相关发病率的可靠数据对于制定政策和规划至关重要。唯一可获得的全国堕胎估计数字是1990年的,从那时起,人口和社会经济的变化可能影响了堕胎的发生率。方法:本研究采用2006年在公立医院接受堕胎相关并发症治疗的妇女的官方统计数据和对知情卫生专业人员的调查数据。使用间接估计技术来计算国家和区域堕胎措施,并将其与1990年的估计数进行比较。结果:2006年,估计有150 000名妇女在公共医院接受了人工流产并发症的治疗,估计每5.8名人工流产妇女中就有1人接受了这种治疗。据估计,2006年人工流产总数为87.5万例,堕胎率为每1 000名15-44岁妇女中有33人堕胎。从1990年到2006年,堕胎率上升了33%(从25%)。不安全堕胎造成的发病率下降了(住院时间缩短了),但年住院率没有下降——1990年为每1 000名妇女5.4人,2006年为每1 000名妇女5.7人。有三个地区的堕胎率与全国平均水平相似(34-36),但有一个地区的堕胎率明显低于全国平均水平(东南地区为25)。结论:非法堕胎继续对墨西哥妇女的健康产生负面影响。建议的应对措施包括在墨西哥各地扩大堕胎的法律标准,改善避孕和堕胎后服务,以及扩大提供安全堕胎(包括药物堕胎)方面的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimates of induced abortion in Mexico: what's changed between 1990 and 2006?

Context: In Mexico, where abortion remains largely illegal and clandestine, reliable data on induced abortion and related morbidity are critical for informing policies and programs. The only available national estimate of abortion is for 1990, and demographic and socioeconomic changes since then have likely affected abortion incidence.

Methods: This study used official statistics on women treated for abortion-related complications in public hospitals in 2006 and data from a survey of informed health professionals. Indirect estimation techniques were used to calculate national and regional abortion measures, which were compared with 1990 estimates.

Results: In 2006, an estimated 150,000 women were treated for induced abortion complications in public-sector hospitals, and one in every 5.8 women having an induced abortion were estimated to have received such treatment. The estimated total number of induced abortions in 2006 was 875,000, and the abortion rate was 33 per 1,000 women aged 15-44. Between 1990 and 2006, the abortion rate increased by 33% (from a rate of 25). The severity of morbidity due to unsafe abortion declined (as seen in shorter hospital stays), but the annual rate of hospitalization did not-it was 5.4 per 1,000 women in 1990 and 5.7 in 2006. The abortion rate was similar to the national average in three regions (34-36), but substantially lower in one (25 in the South/East region).

Conclusions: Clandestine abortion continues to negatively affect women's health in Mexico. Recommended responses include broadening the legal criteria for abortion throughout Mexico, improving contraceptive and postabortion services, and expanding training in the provision of safe abortion, including medical abortion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信