夫妻与癌症:按摩和触摸治疗简短指导的可行性,以建立照顾者效能。

William Collinge, Janet Kahn, Paul Yarnold, Susan Bauer-Wu, Ruth McCorkle
{"title":"夫妻与癌症:按摩和触摸治疗简短指导的可行性,以建立照顾者效能。","authors":"William Collinge,&nbsp;Janet Kahn,&nbsp;Paul Yarnold,&nbsp;Susan Bauer-Wu,&nbsp;Ruth McCorkle","doi":"10.2310/7200.2007.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the feasibility of brief instruction in massage and touch therapy for caregivers (\"partners\") to provide comfort to cancer patients. Fifty partners and 49 patients participated. A longitudinal, within-subjects, repeated measures, control and intervention phases design used self-report instruments to assess feasibility via change in frequency, duration, partner-perceived self-efficacy, and patient-perceived helpfulness over a 90-day follow-up. Exploratory data were collected on psychosocial and quality of life variables. Focus groups provided qualitative data. A structured 6-hour workshop taught basic manual techniques for comfort and relaxation, followed by home practice. Significant increases in frequency (1.2 vs 2.7 times per week) and duration (4.7 vs 12.2 minutes) of massage, both p < .001, were sustained through the 3-month follow-up. Partners' perceived self-efficacy in massage and patients' ratings of its helpfulness more than doubled. Classification tree analysis found caregiver burden, relationship quality, and frequency and duration of practice to predict individual responses. Inhibitions about touch in cancer caregiving may lead to unnecessary physical and emotional distancing at a time when patients need touch the most. Brief instruction may be a feasible intervention to increase caregiver efficacy, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and quality of the relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":87409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology","volume":"5 4","pages":"147-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2310/7200.2007.013","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Couples and cancer: feasibility of brief instruction in massage and touch therapy to build caregiver efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"William Collinge,&nbsp;Janet Kahn,&nbsp;Paul Yarnold,&nbsp;Susan Bauer-Wu,&nbsp;Ruth McCorkle\",\"doi\":\"10.2310/7200.2007.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined the feasibility of brief instruction in massage and touch therapy for caregivers (\\\"partners\\\") to provide comfort to cancer patients. Fifty partners and 49 patients participated. A longitudinal, within-subjects, repeated measures, control and intervention phases design used self-report instruments to assess feasibility via change in frequency, duration, partner-perceived self-efficacy, and patient-perceived helpfulness over a 90-day follow-up. Exploratory data were collected on psychosocial and quality of life variables. Focus groups provided qualitative data. A structured 6-hour workshop taught basic manual techniques for comfort and relaxation, followed by home practice. Significant increases in frequency (1.2 vs 2.7 times per week) and duration (4.7 vs 12.2 minutes) of massage, both p < .001, were sustained through the 3-month follow-up. Partners' perceived self-efficacy in massage and patients' ratings of its helpfulness more than doubled. Classification tree analysis found caregiver burden, relationship quality, and frequency and duration of practice to predict individual responses. Inhibitions about touch in cancer caregiving may lead to unnecessary physical and emotional distancing at a time when patients need touch the most. Brief instruction may be a feasible intervention to increase caregiver efficacy, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and quality of the relationship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"147-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2310/7200.2007.013\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2310/7200.2007.013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2310/7200.2007.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

本研究考察了护理人员(“伴侣”)在按摩和触摸治疗方面的简短指导的可行性,以给癌症患者提供安慰。50名伴侣和49名患者参与。在90天的随访中,使用自我报告工具,通过频率、持续时间、伴侣感知的自我效能和患者感知的帮助性的变化来评估可行性,进行纵向、受试者内部、重复测量、控制和干预阶段设计。收集了社会心理和生活质量变量的探索性数据。焦点小组提供了定性数据。一个结构化的6小时工作坊,教授舒适和放松的基本手工技巧,然后是家庭练习。在3个月的随访中,按摩的频率(每周1.2次vs 2.7次)和持续时间(4.7分钟vs 12.2分钟)均显著增加,p < 0.001。伴侣对按摩的自我效能感和患者对其有用性的评分都增加了一倍以上。分类树分析发现照顾者负担、关系质量、练习的频率和持续时间可以预测个体的反应。在病人最需要接触的时候,癌症护理中对接触的抑制可能会导致不必要的身体和情感距离。简短的指导可能是一种可行的干预措施,以提高护理人员效能,患者满意度,生活质量和关系的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Couples and cancer: feasibility of brief instruction in massage and touch therapy to build caregiver efficacy.

This study examined the feasibility of brief instruction in massage and touch therapy for caregivers ("partners") to provide comfort to cancer patients. Fifty partners and 49 patients participated. A longitudinal, within-subjects, repeated measures, control and intervention phases design used self-report instruments to assess feasibility via change in frequency, duration, partner-perceived self-efficacy, and patient-perceived helpfulness over a 90-day follow-up. Exploratory data were collected on psychosocial and quality of life variables. Focus groups provided qualitative data. A structured 6-hour workshop taught basic manual techniques for comfort and relaxation, followed by home practice. Significant increases in frequency (1.2 vs 2.7 times per week) and duration (4.7 vs 12.2 minutes) of massage, both p < .001, were sustained through the 3-month follow-up. Partners' perceived self-efficacy in massage and patients' ratings of its helpfulness more than doubled. Classification tree analysis found caregiver burden, relationship quality, and frequency and duration of practice to predict individual responses. Inhibitions about touch in cancer caregiving may lead to unnecessary physical and emotional distancing at a time when patients need touch the most. Brief instruction may be a feasible intervention to increase caregiver efficacy, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and quality of the relationship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信