{"title":"健康的医疗保险受益人是否应该推迟D部分的登记?","authors":"Marie Federowicz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Total lifetime expected out-of-pocket costs are minimized if healthy 65-year-old Medicare beneficiaries enroll in Part D immediately upon eligibility rather than waiting until they contract a drug-intensive condition. (2) The savings from early enrollment are greater for females than for males. (3) The late enrollment penalty for Medicare Part D provides an important incentive for early enrollment, and eliminating the late enrollment penalty would create a significant cost advantage for postponed enrollment, especially for men.</p>","PeriodicalId":83710,"journal":{"name":"Findings brief : health care financing & organization","volume":"11 9","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should healthy Medicare beneficiaries postpone enrollment in Part D?\",\"authors\":\"Marie Federowicz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>(1) Total lifetime expected out-of-pocket costs are minimized if healthy 65-year-old Medicare beneficiaries enroll in Part D immediately upon eligibility rather than waiting until they contract a drug-intensive condition. (2) The savings from early enrollment are greater for females than for males. (3) The late enrollment penalty for Medicare Part D provides an important incentive for early enrollment, and eliminating the late enrollment penalty would create a significant cost advantage for postponed enrollment, especially for men.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":83710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Findings brief : health care financing & organization\",\"volume\":\"11 9\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Findings brief : health care financing & organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Findings brief : health care financing & organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Should healthy Medicare beneficiaries postpone enrollment in Part D?
(1) Total lifetime expected out-of-pocket costs are minimized if healthy 65-year-old Medicare beneficiaries enroll in Part D immediately upon eligibility rather than waiting until they contract a drug-intensive condition. (2) The savings from early enrollment are greater for females than for males. (3) The late enrollment penalty for Medicare Part D provides an important incentive for early enrollment, and eliminating the late enrollment penalty would create a significant cost advantage for postponed enrollment, especially for men.