为辩论提供信息:单一专科医院是否比提供全面服务的医院更具成本效益?

Findings brief : health care financing & organization Pub Date : 2008-10-01

Jenny Minott

{"title":"为辩论提供信息:单一专科医院是否比提供全面服务的医院更具成本效益?","authors":"Jenny Minott","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(1) Overall, single specialty hospitals (SSHs) are not more cost efficient than competing, full-service, acute care hospitals. (2) There was not a significant difference between cardiac SSH and full-service hospital cost inefficiency. (3) There was a significant difference between orthopedic/surgical SSH and full-service hospital cost inefficiency.","PeriodicalId":83710,"journal":{"name":"Findings brief : health care financing & organization","volume":"11 7","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informing the debate: are single specialty hospitals more cost efficient than full-service hospitals?\",\"authors\":\"Jenny Minott\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"(1) Overall, single specialty hospitals (SSHs) are not more cost efficient than competing, full-service, acute care hospitals. (2) There was not a significant difference between cardiac SSH and full-service hospital cost inefficiency. (3) There was a significant difference between orthopedic/surgical SSH and full-service hospital cost inefficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Findings brief : health care financing & organization\",\"volume\":\"11 7\",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Findings brief : health care financing & organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Findings brief : health care financing & organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

(1)总体而言，单一专科医院(SSHs)并不比竞争对手的全方位服务急症护理医院更具成本效益。(2)心脏SSH与全科医院成本效率无显著差异。(3)骨科/外科的SSH与全服务医院的成本无效率之间存在显著差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

Informing the debate: are single specialty hospitals more cost efficient than full-service hospitals?

(1) Overall, single specialty hospitals (SSHs) are not more cost efficient than competing, full-service, acute care hospitals. (2) There was not a significant difference between cardiac SSH and full-service hospital cost inefficiency. (3) There was a significant difference between orthopedic/surgical SSH and full-service hospital cost inefficiency.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Findings brief : health care financing & organization

自引率

0.00%

发文量