宫颈鳞状细胞癌体外放射治疗与腔内放射治疗肿瘤消退率的比较。

Radiation medicine Pub Date : 2008-11-01 Epub Date: 2008-11-22 DOI:10.1007/s11604-008-0268-1
Kiyoshi Ohara, Yumiko Oishi Tanaka, Akinori Oki, Yoshikazu Okamoto, Toyomi Satoh, Koji Matsumoto, Hiroyuki Yoshikawa
{"title":"宫颈鳞状细胞癌体外放射治疗与腔内放射治疗肿瘤消退率的比较。","authors":"Kiyoshi Ohara,&nbsp;Yumiko Oishi Tanaka,&nbsp;Akinori Oki,&nbsp;Yoshikazu Okamoto,&nbsp;Toyomi Satoh,&nbsp;Koji Matsumoto,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Yoshikawa","doi":"10.1007/s11604-008-0268-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We compared the radioresponse of cervical carcinoma that was closely related to local disease control by the tumor regression rate (RR) during intracavitary radiotherapy (ICRT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) on the presumption that ICRT has a stronger treatment impact than EBRT because of its specific dose distribution.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 37 patients were treated by EBRT at 45.0 Gy over 5 weeks, followed by high-dose-rate ICRT at 6.0 Gy per weekly insertion at point A three to five times and by boost EBRT. RR was defined as the slope (day(-1)) of the tumor-volume shrinkage curve fit to an exponential regression equation. Assuming that the tumors were ellipsoid, the tumor volume was estimated using magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained before treatment, after 45.0 Gy of EBRT, and after the third ICRT insertion. RRs were compared based on the radiotherapy method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RR ranged between -0.008 to 0.093 day(-1) (median 0.021 day(-1)) during EBRT and -0.001 to 0.097 day(-1) (median 0.018 day(-1)) during ICRT, showing no significant difference or correlation between treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contrary to expectations, RR did not directly relate to the impact of physical treatment. RR could be related to biological factors, such as the amount of tumor clearance and changes in tumor consistency during treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49640,"journal":{"name":"Radiation medicine","volume":"26 9","pages":"526-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11604-008-0268-1","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of tumor regression rate of uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma during external beam and intracavitary radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Kiyoshi Ohara,&nbsp;Yumiko Oishi Tanaka,&nbsp;Akinori Oki,&nbsp;Yoshikazu Okamoto,&nbsp;Toyomi Satoh,&nbsp;Koji Matsumoto,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Yoshikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-008-0268-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We compared the radioresponse of cervical carcinoma that was closely related to local disease control by the tumor regression rate (RR) during intracavitary radiotherapy (ICRT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) on the presumption that ICRT has a stronger treatment impact than EBRT because of its specific dose distribution.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 37 patients were treated by EBRT at 45.0 Gy over 5 weeks, followed by high-dose-rate ICRT at 6.0 Gy per weekly insertion at point A three to five times and by boost EBRT. RR was defined as the slope (day(-1)) of the tumor-volume shrinkage curve fit to an exponential regression equation. Assuming that the tumors were ellipsoid, the tumor volume was estimated using magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained before treatment, after 45.0 Gy of EBRT, and after the third ICRT insertion. RRs were compared based on the radiotherapy method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RR ranged between -0.008 to 0.093 day(-1) (median 0.021 day(-1)) during EBRT and -0.001 to 0.097 day(-1) (median 0.018 day(-1)) during ICRT, showing no significant difference or correlation between treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contrary to expectations, RR did not directly relate to the impact of physical treatment. RR could be related to biological factors, such as the amount of tumor clearance and changes in tumor consistency during treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 9\",\"pages\":\"526-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11604-008-0268-1\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-008-0268-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2008/11/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-008-0268-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:我们假设腔内放疗(ICRT)因其特定剂量分布而比外束放疗(EBRT)具有更强的治疗作用,通过肿瘤消退率(RR)比较与局部疾病控制密切相关的宫颈癌在腔内放疗(ICRT)和外束放疗(EBRT)期间的放射反应。材料和方法:共有37例患者接受了5周内45.0 Gy的EBRT治疗,随后在A点进行了每周6.0 Gy的高剂量ICRT治疗3至5次,并进行了增强EBRT治疗。RR定义为肿瘤体积收缩曲线的斜率(天(-1))与指数回归方程的拟合。假设肿瘤呈椭球状,使用治疗前、45.0 Gy EBRT治疗后和第三次ICRT插入后获得的磁共振(MR)图像估计肿瘤体积。比较不同放疗方式的rr。结果:EBRT期间的RR范围为-0.008 ~ 0.093天(-1)(中位数为0.021天(-1)),ICRT期间的RR范围为-0.001 ~ 0.097天(-1)(中位数为0.018天(-1)),两种治疗之间无显著差异或相关性。结论:与预期相反,RR与物理治疗的影响没有直接关系。RR可能与生物学因素有关,如治疗期间肿瘤清除率和肿瘤一致性的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of tumor regression rate of uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma during external beam and intracavitary radiotherapy.

Purpose: We compared the radioresponse of cervical carcinoma that was closely related to local disease control by the tumor regression rate (RR) during intracavitary radiotherapy (ICRT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) on the presumption that ICRT has a stronger treatment impact than EBRT because of its specific dose distribution.

Materials and methods: A total of 37 patients were treated by EBRT at 45.0 Gy over 5 weeks, followed by high-dose-rate ICRT at 6.0 Gy per weekly insertion at point A three to five times and by boost EBRT. RR was defined as the slope (day(-1)) of the tumor-volume shrinkage curve fit to an exponential regression equation. Assuming that the tumors were ellipsoid, the tumor volume was estimated using magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained before treatment, after 45.0 Gy of EBRT, and after the third ICRT insertion. RRs were compared based on the radiotherapy method.

Results: RR ranged between -0.008 to 0.093 day(-1) (median 0.021 day(-1)) during EBRT and -0.001 to 0.097 day(-1) (median 0.018 day(-1)) during ICRT, showing no significant difference or correlation between treatments.

Conclusion: Contrary to expectations, RR did not directly relate to the impact of physical treatment. RR could be related to biological factors, such as the amount of tumor clearance and changes in tumor consistency during treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信