改革初级卫生保健:新西兰初级卫生保健战略是否实现了其早期目标?

Jacqueline Cumming, Nicholas Mays, Barry Gribben
{"title":"改革初级卫生保健:新西兰初级卫生保健战略是否实现了其早期目标?","authors":"Jacqueline Cumming,&nbsp;Nicholas Mays,&nbsp;Barry Gribben","doi":"10.1186/1743-8462-5-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2001, the New Zealand government introduced its Primary Health Care Strategy (PHCS), aimed at strengthening the role of primary health care, in order to improve health and to reduce inequalities in health. As part of the Strategy, new funding was provided to reduce the fees that patients pay when they use primary health care services in New Zealand, to improve access to services and to increase service use. In this article, we estimate the impact of the new funding on general practitioner and practice nurse visit fees paid by patients and on consultation rates. The analyses involved before-and-after monitoring of fees and consultation rates in a random sample of 99 general practices and covered the period from June 2001 (pre-Strategy) to mid-2005.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fees fell particularly in Access (higher need, higher per capita funded) practices over time for doctor and nurse visits. Fees increased over time for many in Interim (lower need, lower per capita funded) practices, but they fell for patients aged 65 years and over as new funding was provided for this age group. There were increases in consultation rates across almost all age, funding model (Access or Interim), socio-demographic and ethnic groups. Increases were particularly high in Access practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Strategy has resulted in lower fees for primary health care for many New Zealanders, and consultation rates have also increased over the past few years. However, fees have not fallen by as much as expected in government policy given the amount of extra public money spent since there are limited requirements for practices to reduce patients' fees in line with increases in public funding for primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":87170,"journal":{"name":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","volume":"5 ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-5-24","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reforming primary health care: is New Zealand's primary health care strategy achieving its early goals?\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline Cumming,&nbsp;Nicholas Mays,&nbsp;Barry Gribben\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1743-8462-5-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2001, the New Zealand government introduced its Primary Health Care Strategy (PHCS), aimed at strengthening the role of primary health care, in order to improve health and to reduce inequalities in health. As part of the Strategy, new funding was provided to reduce the fees that patients pay when they use primary health care services in New Zealand, to improve access to services and to increase service use. In this article, we estimate the impact of the new funding on general practitioner and practice nurse visit fees paid by patients and on consultation rates. The analyses involved before-and-after monitoring of fees and consultation rates in a random sample of 99 general practices and covered the period from June 2001 (pre-Strategy) to mid-2005.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fees fell particularly in Access (higher need, higher per capita funded) practices over time for doctor and nurse visits. Fees increased over time for many in Interim (lower need, lower per capita funded) practices, but they fell for patients aged 65 years and over as new funding was provided for this age group. There were increases in consultation rates across almost all age, funding model (Access or Interim), socio-demographic and ethnic groups. Increases were particularly high in Access practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Strategy has resulted in lower fees for primary health care for many New Zealanders, and consultation rates have also increased over the past few years. However, fees have not fallen by as much as expected in government policy given the amount of extra public money spent since there are limited requirements for practices to reduce patients' fees in line with increases in public funding for primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australia and New Zealand health policy\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-5-24\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australia and New Zealand health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-5-24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-5-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2001年,新西兰政府推出了初级保健战略,旨在加强初级保健的作用,以改善健康和减少保健方面的不平等现象。作为该战略的一部分,提供了新的资金,以减少患者在新西兰使用初级卫生保健服务时支付的费用,改善获得服务的机会,并增加服务的使用。在这篇文章中,我们估计了新的资金对全科医生和执业护士的病人支付的诊疗费和会诊率的影响。这些分析包括从2001年6月(策略实施前)至2005年年中,对99家全科诊所的收费和咨询费率进行前后监测。结果:随着时间的推移,医生和护士就诊的费用下降尤其明显(需求更高,人均资助更高)。随着时间的推移,许多临时(需求较低,人均资助较低)实践的费用增加了,但65岁及以上患者的费用下降了,因为为这一年龄组提供了新的资金。几乎所有年龄段、资助模式(无障碍或临时)、社会人口和种族群体的咨询率都有所增加。在无障碍实践中,增幅尤其高。结论:该战略降低了许多新西兰人的初级保健费用,在过去几年中,咨询率也有所提高。然而,考虑到额外的公共资金支出,费用并没有像政府政策所预期的那样下降得那么多,因为根据初级保健公共资金的增加,对降低患者费用的做法要求有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reforming primary health care: is New Zealand's primary health care strategy achieving its early goals?

Reforming primary health care: is New Zealand's primary health care strategy achieving its early goals?

Reforming primary health care: is New Zealand's primary health care strategy achieving its early goals?

Reforming primary health care: is New Zealand's primary health care strategy achieving its early goals?

Background: In 2001, the New Zealand government introduced its Primary Health Care Strategy (PHCS), aimed at strengthening the role of primary health care, in order to improve health and to reduce inequalities in health. As part of the Strategy, new funding was provided to reduce the fees that patients pay when they use primary health care services in New Zealand, to improve access to services and to increase service use. In this article, we estimate the impact of the new funding on general practitioner and practice nurse visit fees paid by patients and on consultation rates. The analyses involved before-and-after monitoring of fees and consultation rates in a random sample of 99 general practices and covered the period from June 2001 (pre-Strategy) to mid-2005.

Results: Fees fell particularly in Access (higher need, higher per capita funded) practices over time for doctor and nurse visits. Fees increased over time for many in Interim (lower need, lower per capita funded) practices, but they fell for patients aged 65 years and over as new funding was provided for this age group. There were increases in consultation rates across almost all age, funding model (Access or Interim), socio-demographic and ethnic groups. Increases were particularly high in Access practices.

Conclusion: The Strategy has resulted in lower fees for primary health care for many New Zealanders, and consultation rates have also increased over the past few years. However, fees have not fallen by as much as expected in government policy given the amount of extra public money spent since there are limited requirements for practices to reduce patients' fees in line with increases in public funding for primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信