土耳其的夫妻协议、权力关系和避孕措施的使用。

Andrzej Kulczycki
{"title":"土耳其的夫妻协议、权力关系和避孕措施的使用。","authors":"Andrzej Kulczycki","doi":"10.1363/ifpp.34.127.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nIn Turkey, contraceptive use has become more widespread, but little is known about the concurrence of spousal reports or the relative influence of communication, decision making and power differentials on method use.\n\n\nMETHODS\nData from the 1998 Turkish Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) for 1,546 married couples were tested for concurrence between spousal reports on fertility and family planning variables. Multivariate regression analyses based on wives', husbands' and joint reports of current contraceptive use were used to assess the association between such use and various background, communication and interspousal variables.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSpousal reports on most fertility and contraceptive use measures demonstrated moderate to high concordance, whereas reports of approval of family planning showed only fair concordance. After adjusting for background factors, models based on wives' and husbands' reports showed that current contraceptive use was positively associated with the number of methods known (odds ratios, 1.2 and 1.1, respectively) and perception of spousal approval (3.3 and 2.0, respectively), and in the husbands' model, with approval of either spouse or both (3.8-5.8). In the combined model, contraceptive use was positively associated with both partners approving of family planning (2.4), and negatively associated with both partners wanting more than three children and with only wives wanting three or fewer (0.4 and 0.6, respectively).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nDiscrepancies between spousal reports were less significant in Turkey than in most developing countries with DHS data, but the differences were not inconsequential to explaining how spousal attitudes and preferences influence contraceptive use. No evidence was found associating interspousal power differentials with method use. Further research is needed to improve the testing and modeling of such dyadic processes.","PeriodicalId":81537,"journal":{"name":"International family planning perspectives","volume":"34 3","pages":"127-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Husband-wife agreement, power relations and contraceptive use in Turkey.\",\"authors\":\"Andrzej Kulczycki\",\"doi\":\"10.1363/ifpp.34.127.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONTEXT\\nIn Turkey, contraceptive use has become more widespread, but little is known about the concurrence of spousal reports or the relative influence of communication, decision making and power differentials on method use.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nData from the 1998 Turkish Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) for 1,546 married couples were tested for concurrence between spousal reports on fertility and family planning variables. Multivariate regression analyses based on wives', husbands' and joint reports of current contraceptive use were used to assess the association between such use and various background, communication and interspousal variables.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nSpousal reports on most fertility and contraceptive use measures demonstrated moderate to high concordance, whereas reports of approval of family planning showed only fair concordance. After adjusting for background factors, models based on wives' and husbands' reports showed that current contraceptive use was positively associated with the number of methods known (odds ratios, 1.2 and 1.1, respectively) and perception of spousal approval (3.3 and 2.0, respectively), and in the husbands' model, with approval of either spouse or both (3.8-5.8). In the combined model, contraceptive use was positively associated with both partners approving of family planning (2.4), and negatively associated with both partners wanting more than three children and with only wives wanting three or fewer (0.4 and 0.6, respectively).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nDiscrepancies between spousal reports were less significant in Turkey than in most developing countries with DHS data, but the differences were not inconsequential to explaining how spousal attitudes and preferences influence contraceptive use. No evidence was found associating interspousal power differentials with method use. Further research is needed to improve the testing and modeling of such dyadic processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International family planning perspectives\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"127-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"71\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International family planning perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1363/ifpp.34.127.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International family planning perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/ifpp.34.127.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

摘要

背景:在土耳其,避孕药具的使用已变得越来越普遍,但人们对配偶报告的一致性或沟通、决策和权力差异对方法使用的相对影响知之甚少。方法:对1998年土耳其人口与健康调查(DHS)中1546对已婚夫妇的数据进行测试,以确定配偶报告的生育率和计划生育变量之间的一致性。使用基于妻子、丈夫和目前避孕药具使用情况的联合报告的多变量回归分析来评估这种使用与各种背景、沟通和配偶间变量之间的关系。结果:配偶报告对大多数生育和避孕措施的使用显示中等至高度的一致性,而批准计划生育的报告显示只有一般的一致性。在调整了背景因素后,基于妻子和丈夫报告的模型显示,当前避孕措施的使用与已知方法的数量(比值比分别为1.2和1.1)和配偶认可的感知(比值比分别为3.3和2.0)呈正相关,在丈夫模型中,配偶一方或双方的认可(3.8-5.8)。在联合模型中,避孕药具的使用与夫妻双方都赞成计划生育呈正相关(2.4),与夫妻双方都想要三个以上孩子和只有妻子想要三个或更少孩子负相关(分别为0.4和0.6)。结论:在土耳其,配偶报告之间的差异不像大多数发展中国家的人口与健康调查数据那样显著,但这种差异对于解释配偶态度和偏好如何影响避孕药具的使用并非无关紧要。没有证据表明夫妻之间的权力差异与方法的使用有关。需要进一步的研究来改进这种二元过程的测试和建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Husband-wife agreement, power relations and contraceptive use in Turkey.
CONTEXT In Turkey, contraceptive use has become more widespread, but little is known about the concurrence of spousal reports or the relative influence of communication, decision making and power differentials on method use. METHODS Data from the 1998 Turkish Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) for 1,546 married couples were tested for concurrence between spousal reports on fertility and family planning variables. Multivariate regression analyses based on wives', husbands' and joint reports of current contraceptive use were used to assess the association between such use and various background, communication and interspousal variables. RESULTS Spousal reports on most fertility and contraceptive use measures demonstrated moderate to high concordance, whereas reports of approval of family planning showed only fair concordance. After adjusting for background factors, models based on wives' and husbands' reports showed that current contraceptive use was positively associated with the number of methods known (odds ratios, 1.2 and 1.1, respectively) and perception of spousal approval (3.3 and 2.0, respectively), and in the husbands' model, with approval of either spouse or both (3.8-5.8). In the combined model, contraceptive use was positively associated with both partners approving of family planning (2.4), and negatively associated with both partners wanting more than three children and with only wives wanting three or fewer (0.4 and 0.6, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Discrepancies between spousal reports were less significant in Turkey than in most developing countries with DHS data, but the differences were not inconsequential to explaining how spousal attitudes and preferences influence contraceptive use. No evidence was found associating interspousal power differentials with method use. Further research is needed to improve the testing and modeling of such dyadic processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信