慢性腰痛和功能恢复方案:患者可接受症状状态的适用性。

O. Véron, E. Tcherniatinsky, F. Fayad, M. Revel, S. Poiraudeau
{"title":"慢性腰痛和功能恢复方案:患者可接受症状状态的适用性。","authors":"O. Véron,&nbsp;E. Tcherniatinsky,&nbsp;F. Fayad,&nbsp;M. Revel,&nbsp;S. Poiraudeau","doi":"10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To search for predictors of reduced low back pain under the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) at the end of a functional restoration program (FRP) in chronic low back pain, and then to compare the effectiveness of FRP depending on the rate of people returning to work, the acceptability threshold of pain has been reached or not at the end of the program.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Open prospective study on 303 patients with chronic low back pain included in a FRP. An assessment of the deficiencies (finger-tip-to-floor (cm) and Schöber tests (cm), <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>V</mi><mrow><msub><mtext>O</mtext><mrow><mtext>2 max</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> (l/min), Shirado and Sorensen tests (seconds), lumbar and radicular VAS (0–100), the functional disability (Wadell and Quebec scales (0–9 and 0–100), and the psychological status (Beck and Hamilton scale (0–35 and 0–30), HAD scale (0–21), FABQ (0–42 and 0–24)) was conducted at the beginning and end of the program. Data on the work were also collected (arduous physical labor, work-related accident or not, sick leaves or not and length, return to work at the end of the program). The variables associated with a PASS at the end of the FRP and a correlation between the level of pain and the return to work were sought.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The parameters were significantly improved : finger-tip-to-floor test (−17,5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->16,2), Schöber test (−0,5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5,4), lumbar VAS(−6,3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->23,6), <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>V</mi><mrow><msub><mtext>O</mtext><mrow><mtext>2 max</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> (0,14<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0,4), Wadell (−1,3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2,4), Quebec (−10,5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->17), Beck D (−3,1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4,5), Beck A (−2,5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4,3), HAD D (−2,4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4,7), HAD A (−1,3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3,8) et FABQ1 (−5,7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11,6), FABQ2 (−3,9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->9,6) scores, endurance of the flexor (35<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->63,83) and extensor (44,8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->112) spine. Patients reaching the PASS for pain level return significantly more to work (73% versus 52%). Five parameters indicative of a reduction of back pain under the PASS were identified : lumbar VAS and endurance of the flexor spine at the beginning, changes in finger-tip-to-floor test, radicular VAS and Beck score for anxiety.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The PASS appears to be a relevant concept associated with a successful return to work for patients with chronic low back pain and severe disability after a program of FRP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72206,"journal":{"name":"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.08.003","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lombalgie chronique et réentraînement à l’effort : application de la notion de niveau de douleur cliniquement acceptable\",\"authors\":\"O. Véron,&nbsp;E. Tcherniatinsky,&nbsp;F. Fayad,&nbsp;M. Revel,&nbsp;S. Poiraudeau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To search for predictors of reduced low back pain under the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) at the end of a functional restoration program (FRP) in chronic low back pain, and then to compare the effectiveness of FRP depending on the rate of people returning to work, the acceptability threshold of pain has been reached or not at the end of the program.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Open prospective study on 303 patients with chronic low back pain included in a FRP. An assessment of the deficiencies (finger-tip-to-floor (cm) and Schöber tests (cm), <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>V</mi><mrow><msub><mtext>O</mtext><mrow><mtext>2 max</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> (l/min), Shirado and Sorensen tests (seconds), lumbar and radicular VAS (0–100), the functional disability (Wadell and Quebec scales (0–9 and 0–100), and the psychological status (Beck and Hamilton scale (0–35 and 0–30), HAD scale (0–21), FABQ (0–42 and 0–24)) was conducted at the beginning and end of the program. Data on the work were also collected (arduous physical labor, work-related accident or not, sick leaves or not and length, return to work at the end of the program). The variables associated with a PASS at the end of the FRP and a correlation between the level of pain and the return to work were sought.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The parameters were significantly improved : finger-tip-to-floor test (−17,5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->16,2), Schöber test (−0,5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5,4), lumbar VAS(−6,3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->23,6), <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>V</mi><mrow><msub><mtext>O</mtext><mrow><mtext>2 max</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> (0,14<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0,4), Wadell (−1,3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2,4), Quebec (−10,5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->17), Beck D (−3,1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4,5), Beck A (−2,5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4,3), HAD D (−2,4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4,7), HAD A (−1,3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3,8) et FABQ1 (−5,7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11,6), FABQ2 (−3,9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->9,6) scores, endurance of the flexor (35<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->63,83) and extensor (44,8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->112) spine. Patients reaching the PASS for pain level return significantly more to work (73% versus 52%). Five parameters indicative of a reduction of back pain under the PASS were identified : lumbar VAS and endurance of the flexor spine at the beginning, changes in finger-tip-to-floor test, radicular VAS and Beck score for anxiety.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The PASS appears to be a relevant concept associated with a successful return to work for patients with chronic low back pain and severe disability after a program of FRP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.08.003\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016860540800175X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016860540800175X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

目的:寻找慢性腰痛患者功能恢复计划(FRP)结束时患者可接受症状状态(PASS)下腰痛减轻的预测因素,然后比较FRP的有效性,这取决于人们重返工作岗位的比率,疼痛的可接受阈值在计划结束时是否达到。方法对303例慢性腰痛患者进行开放式前瞻性研究。在项目开始和结束时对缺陷(指尖到地板(cm)和Schöber测试(cm)、最大摄血量(l/min)、Shirado和Sorensen测试(秒)、腰椎和神经根VAS(0-100)、功能残疾(Wadell和Quebec量表(0-9和0-100)和心理状态(Beck和Hamilton量表(0-35和0-30)、HAD量表(0-21)、FABQ量表(0-42和0-24)进行评估。还收集了有关工作的数据(繁重的体力劳动,是否发生工伤事故,是否请病假和时间长短,项目结束后重返工作岗位)。寻求与FRP结束时PASS相关的变量以及疼痛水平与重返工作之间的相关性。ResultsThe参数显著提高:finger-tip-to-floor测试(5±16−17日,2),Schober测试(−0±5 4),腰血管(−6,3±23日6),最大摄氧量(0,14±0,4),Wadell(−1、3±2,4),魁北克(10−5±17),贝克D(−3、1±4、5),贝克一(−2、5±4、3),有D(−2、4±4、7),有(−1 3±3 8)等FABQ1(−5、7±11、6),FABQ2(−3、9±9、6)分数,耐力的屈肌(35 63±83)和伸肌(44岁8±112)脊柱。达到PASS疼痛水平的患者明显更多地重返工作岗位(73%对52%)。确定了在PASS下表明背部疼痛减轻的五个参数:腰部VAS和开始时屈肌的耐力,指尖到地板测试的变化,神经根VAS和Beck焦虑评分。结论:对于慢性腰痛和严重残疾患者,在玻璃钢治疗后,PASS似乎是一个与成功重返工作岗位相关的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lombalgie chronique et réentraînement à l’effort : application de la notion de niveau de douleur cliniquement acceptable

Objectives

To search for predictors of reduced low back pain under the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) at the end of a functional restoration program (FRP) in chronic low back pain, and then to compare the effectiveness of FRP depending on the rate of people returning to work, the acceptability threshold of pain has been reached or not at the end of the program.

Method

Open prospective study on 303 patients with chronic low back pain included in a FRP. An assessment of the deficiencies (finger-tip-to-floor (cm) and Schöber tests (cm), VO2 max (l/min), Shirado and Sorensen tests (seconds), lumbar and radicular VAS (0–100), the functional disability (Wadell and Quebec scales (0–9 and 0–100), and the psychological status (Beck and Hamilton scale (0–35 and 0–30), HAD scale (0–21), FABQ (0–42 and 0–24)) was conducted at the beginning and end of the program. Data on the work were also collected (arduous physical labor, work-related accident or not, sick leaves or not and length, return to work at the end of the program). The variables associated with a PASS at the end of the FRP and a correlation between the level of pain and the return to work were sought.

Results

The parameters were significantly improved : finger-tip-to-floor test (−17,5 ± 16,2), Schöber test (−0,5 ± 5,4), lumbar VAS(−6,3 ± 23,6), VO2 max (0,14 ± 0,4), Wadell (−1,3 ± 2,4), Quebec (−10,5 ± 17), Beck D (−3,1 ± 4,5), Beck A (−2,5 ± 4,3), HAD D (−2,4 ± 4,7), HAD A (−1,3 ± 3,8) et FABQ1 (−5,7 ± 11,6), FABQ2 (−3,9 ± 9,6) scores, endurance of the flexor (35 ± 63,83) and extensor (44,8 ± 112) spine. Patients reaching the PASS for pain level return significantly more to work (73% versus 52%). Five parameters indicative of a reduction of back pain under the PASS were identified : lumbar VAS and endurance of the flexor spine at the beginning, changes in finger-tip-to-floor test, radicular VAS and Beck score for anxiety.

Conclusion

The PASS appears to be a relevant concept associated with a successful return to work for patients with chronic low back pain and severe disability after a program of FRP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信