盐酸尼非卡兰特对直流除颤后QT离散度的影响。

Osaka city medical journal Pub Date : 2008-06-01
Keiko Maeda, Masahiko Takagi, Hiroaki Tatsumi, Eiichiro Nakagawa, Minoru Yoshiyama
{"title":"盐酸尼非卡兰特对直流除颤后QT离散度的影响。","authors":"Keiko Maeda,&nbsp;Masahiko Takagi,&nbsp;Hiroaki Tatsumi,&nbsp;Eiichiro Nakagawa,&nbsp;Minoru Yoshiyama","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although nifekalant hydrochloride (NIFE) has been demonstrated to suppress ventricular tachyarrhythmia, especially electrical storm, the mechanism by which it does so is still unclear. We examined its effects on the spatial dispersion of repolarization (SDR) after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In twenty five patients with an ICD, we recorded the 87-lead ECG during sinus rhythm (the CONTROL group) under general anesthesia, after NIFE administration alone, and just after termination of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) by ICD shock with or without NIFE administration. In all recordings, the corrected QT interval (QTc) was measured in each lead. The dispersion of QTc (QTc-D; maximum QTc minus minimum QTc) was also measured. Compared with the CONTROL, the QTc-D exhibited significant deterioration after ICD shock (61 +/- 12, 91 +/- 24 ms(1/2), respectively, p < 0.001). However, the QTc-D after NIFE administration either with or without ICD shock did not differ from the CONTROL group (65 +/- 20, 61 +/- 18, and 61 +/- 12 ms(1/2), respectively, p = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NIFE suppressed the deterioration of SDR by ICD shock. This might be a mechanism by which NIFE suppresses recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia after ICD shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":19613,"journal":{"name":"Osaka city medical journal","volume":"54 1","pages":"11-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of nifekalant hydrochloride on the QT dispersion after direct-current defibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Keiko Maeda,&nbsp;Masahiko Takagi,&nbsp;Hiroaki Tatsumi,&nbsp;Eiichiro Nakagawa,&nbsp;Minoru Yoshiyama\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although nifekalant hydrochloride (NIFE) has been demonstrated to suppress ventricular tachyarrhythmia, especially electrical storm, the mechanism by which it does so is still unclear. We examined its effects on the spatial dispersion of repolarization (SDR) after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In twenty five patients with an ICD, we recorded the 87-lead ECG during sinus rhythm (the CONTROL group) under general anesthesia, after NIFE administration alone, and just after termination of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) by ICD shock with or without NIFE administration. In all recordings, the corrected QT interval (QTc) was measured in each lead. The dispersion of QTc (QTc-D; maximum QTc minus minimum QTc) was also measured. Compared with the CONTROL, the QTc-D exhibited significant deterioration after ICD shock (61 +/- 12, 91 +/- 24 ms(1/2), respectively, p < 0.001). However, the QTc-D after NIFE administration either with or without ICD shock did not differ from the CONTROL group (65 +/- 20, 61 +/- 18, and 61 +/- 12 ms(1/2), respectively, p = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NIFE suppressed the deterioration of SDR by ICD shock. This might be a mechanism by which NIFE suppresses recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia after ICD shock.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osaka city medical journal\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"11-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osaka city medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osaka city medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然盐酸尼非卡兰特(NIFE)已被证明可抑制室性心动过速,特别是电风暴,但其机制尚不清楚。我们研究了它对植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)休克后复极空间弥散(SDR)的影响。方法和结果:我们记录了25例ICD患者在全身麻醉下窦性心律(对照组)、单独给药NIFE后、ICD休克结束后(有或没有给药NIFE)诱发性心室颤动(VF)后的87导联心电图。在所有记录中,测量每个导联的校正QT间期(QTc)。QTc (QTc- d;最大QTc减去最小QTc)。与对照组相比,ICD休克后QTc-D明显恶化(分别为61 +/- 12、91 +/- 24 ms(1/2), p < 0.001)。然而,无论是否有ICD休克,NIFE给药后的QTc-D与对照组没有差异(分别为65 +/- 20、61 +/- 18和61 +/- 12 ms(1/2), p = 0.99)。结论:NIFE抑制了ICD休克引起的SDR恶化。这可能是NIFE抑制ICD休克后室性心动过速复发的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of nifekalant hydrochloride on the QT dispersion after direct-current defibrillation.

Background: Although nifekalant hydrochloride (NIFE) has been demonstrated to suppress ventricular tachyarrhythmia, especially electrical storm, the mechanism by which it does so is still unclear. We examined its effects on the spatial dispersion of repolarization (SDR) after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock.

Methods and results: In twenty five patients with an ICD, we recorded the 87-lead ECG during sinus rhythm (the CONTROL group) under general anesthesia, after NIFE administration alone, and just after termination of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) by ICD shock with or without NIFE administration. In all recordings, the corrected QT interval (QTc) was measured in each lead. The dispersion of QTc (QTc-D; maximum QTc minus minimum QTc) was also measured. Compared with the CONTROL, the QTc-D exhibited significant deterioration after ICD shock (61 +/- 12, 91 +/- 24 ms(1/2), respectively, p < 0.001). However, the QTc-D after NIFE administration either with or without ICD shock did not differ from the CONTROL group (65 +/- 20, 61 +/- 18, and 61 +/- 12 ms(1/2), respectively, p = 0.99).

Conclusions: NIFE suppressed the deterioration of SDR by ICD shock. This might be a mechanism by which NIFE suppresses recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia after ICD shock.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信