高渗性咳嗽挑战中咳嗽的同步计数与视频计数。

Heikki O Koskela, Minna K Purokivi, Raija M Tukiainen
{"title":"高渗性咳嗽挑战中咳嗽的同步计数与视频计数。","authors":"Heikki O Koskela,&nbsp;Minna K Purokivi,&nbsp;Raija M Tukiainen","doi":"10.1186/1745-9974-4-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coughs occurring during cough provocation tests are usually counted at the same time when the test is being conducted, i.e., simultaneously. It is unknown whether cough counting from video recording might increase the accuracy of the cough counting. During recent years, cough challenges with hypertonic aerosols have been introduced. They often provoke very frequent coughing which may complicate the simultaneous cough counting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether cough counting from video recording is superior to simultaneous cough counting in two different hypertonic cough challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis includes 82 hypertonic saline challenges performed on 66 subjects, providing 1984 observation minutes with both simultaneous and video cough counting. The cough sensitivity was expressed as the osmolality to provoke 15 cumulative coughs (CUM15). The analysis also includes 136 hypertonic histamine challenges performed on 114 subjects providing 5373 observation minutes with both simultaneous and video counting. The cough sensitivity was expressed as the cumulative number of coughs divided by the final histamine concentration administered (CCR). This challenge involved several additional measurements to cough counting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the saline challenge, the mean difference between the counting types was 0.0 coughs per minute with 95% limits of agreement of -1.2 to 1.2 coughs per minute. For the hypertonic histamine challenge the respective figures were 0.3 (-1.9 to 2.5) coughs per minute. At high coughing frequency the video counts tended to outnumber the simultaneous counts. The counting type had no effect on the hypertonic saline CUM15 and only a marginal effect on its repeatability. On the contrary, video counting resulted to significantly higher hypertonic histamine CCR values than simultaneous counting (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The agreement between simultaneous and video counting of coughs is generally good. However, as the coughing frequency increases, simultaneous counting may miss coughs, especially if the nurse has to share his/her attention to several activities simultaneously. Video recording is advisable for the hypertonic histamine challenge but unnecessary for the hypertonic saline challenge. To ensure reliable simultaneous cough counting, cough provocation tests should be performed in a quiet environment, applying as little unnecessary equipment and measurements as possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":10747,"journal":{"name":"Cough (London, England)","volume":"4 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-9974-4-8","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous versus video counting of coughs in hypertonic cough challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Heikki O Koskela,&nbsp;Minna K Purokivi,&nbsp;Raija M Tukiainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1745-9974-4-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coughs occurring during cough provocation tests are usually counted at the same time when the test is being conducted, i.e., simultaneously. It is unknown whether cough counting from video recording might increase the accuracy of the cough counting. During recent years, cough challenges with hypertonic aerosols have been introduced. They often provoke very frequent coughing which may complicate the simultaneous cough counting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether cough counting from video recording is superior to simultaneous cough counting in two different hypertonic cough challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis includes 82 hypertonic saline challenges performed on 66 subjects, providing 1984 observation minutes with both simultaneous and video cough counting. The cough sensitivity was expressed as the osmolality to provoke 15 cumulative coughs (CUM15). The analysis also includes 136 hypertonic histamine challenges performed on 114 subjects providing 5373 observation minutes with both simultaneous and video counting. The cough sensitivity was expressed as the cumulative number of coughs divided by the final histamine concentration administered (CCR). This challenge involved several additional measurements to cough counting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the saline challenge, the mean difference between the counting types was 0.0 coughs per minute with 95% limits of agreement of -1.2 to 1.2 coughs per minute. For the hypertonic histamine challenge the respective figures were 0.3 (-1.9 to 2.5) coughs per minute. At high coughing frequency the video counts tended to outnumber the simultaneous counts. The counting type had no effect on the hypertonic saline CUM15 and only a marginal effect on its repeatability. On the contrary, video counting resulted to significantly higher hypertonic histamine CCR values than simultaneous counting (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The agreement between simultaneous and video counting of coughs is generally good. However, as the coughing frequency increases, simultaneous counting may miss coughs, especially if the nurse has to share his/her attention to several activities simultaneously. Video recording is advisable for the hypertonic histamine challenge but unnecessary for the hypertonic saline challenge. To ensure reliable simultaneous cough counting, cough provocation tests should be performed in a quiet environment, applying as little unnecessary equipment and measurements as possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cough (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-9974-4-8\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cough (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-4-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cough (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-4-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:咳嗽激发试验期间发生的咳嗽通常在进行试验时同时计数,即同时计数。目前尚不清楚视频记录的咳嗽计数是否会增加咳嗽计数的准确性。近年来,高渗气溶胶带来的咳嗽挑战已经被介绍。他们经常引起非常频繁的咳嗽,这可能使同时咳嗽计数复杂化。目的:评价在两种不同的高渗性咳嗽中,录像计数是否优于同步计数。方法:对66例患者进行82次高渗生理盐水刺激,同时进行咳嗽计数和录像计数,观察时间为1984分钟。咳嗽敏感性表示为引起15次累积咳嗽的渗透压(CUM15)。该分析还包括114名受试者的136次高渗组胺挑战,提供5373分钟的观察时间,包括同步和视频计数。咳嗽敏感性表示为咳嗽累积次数除以最终给药组胺浓度(CCR)。这一挑战涉及到咳嗽计数的几个额外测量。结果:对于生理盐水刺激,计数类型之间的平均差异为每分钟0.0次咳嗽,95%的一致性限为每分钟-1.2至1.2次咳嗽。对于高渗组胺挑战,相应的数字为每分钟0.3(-1.9至2.5)次咳嗽。在高咳嗽频率下,视频计数往往超过同时计数。计数类型对高渗生理盐水CUM15没有影响,对其重复性只有边际影响。相反,视频计数导致高渗组胺CCR值显著高于同步计数(p < 0.001)。结论:咳嗽同步计数与视频计数的一致性较好。然而,随着咳嗽频率的增加,同时计数可能会漏掉咳嗽,特别是当护士必须同时注意几项活动时。高渗组胺刺激时建议录像,但高渗生理盐水刺激时不需要录像。为确保可靠的咳嗽计数,咳嗽诱发试验应在安静的环境中进行,尽可能少使用不必要的设备和测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Simultaneous versus video counting of coughs in hypertonic cough challenges.

Simultaneous versus video counting of coughs in hypertonic cough challenges.

Simultaneous versus video counting of coughs in hypertonic cough challenges.

Simultaneous versus video counting of coughs in hypertonic cough challenges.

Background: The coughs occurring during cough provocation tests are usually counted at the same time when the test is being conducted, i.e., simultaneously. It is unknown whether cough counting from video recording might increase the accuracy of the cough counting. During recent years, cough challenges with hypertonic aerosols have been introduced. They often provoke very frequent coughing which may complicate the simultaneous cough counting.

Objective: To assess whether cough counting from video recording is superior to simultaneous cough counting in two different hypertonic cough challenges.

Methods: The analysis includes 82 hypertonic saline challenges performed on 66 subjects, providing 1984 observation minutes with both simultaneous and video cough counting. The cough sensitivity was expressed as the osmolality to provoke 15 cumulative coughs (CUM15). The analysis also includes 136 hypertonic histamine challenges performed on 114 subjects providing 5373 observation minutes with both simultaneous and video counting. The cough sensitivity was expressed as the cumulative number of coughs divided by the final histamine concentration administered (CCR). This challenge involved several additional measurements to cough counting.

Results: For the saline challenge, the mean difference between the counting types was 0.0 coughs per minute with 95% limits of agreement of -1.2 to 1.2 coughs per minute. For the hypertonic histamine challenge the respective figures were 0.3 (-1.9 to 2.5) coughs per minute. At high coughing frequency the video counts tended to outnumber the simultaneous counts. The counting type had no effect on the hypertonic saline CUM15 and only a marginal effect on its repeatability. On the contrary, video counting resulted to significantly higher hypertonic histamine CCR values than simultaneous counting (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The agreement between simultaneous and video counting of coughs is generally good. However, as the coughing frequency increases, simultaneous counting may miss coughs, especially if the nurse has to share his/her attention to several activities simultaneously. Video recording is advisable for the hypertonic histamine challenge but unnecessary for the hypertonic saline challenge. To ensure reliable simultaneous cough counting, cough provocation tests should be performed in a quiet environment, applying as little unnecessary equipment and measurements as possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信