1型糖尿病儿童及其家庭的糖尿病教育。

Robert Couch, Mary Jetha, Donna M Dryden, Nicola Hooten, Yuanyuan Liang, Tamara Durec, Elizabeth Sumamo, Carol Spooner, Andrea Milne, Kate O'Gorman, Terry P Klassen
{"title":"1型糖尿病儿童及其家庭的糖尿病教育。","authors":"Robert Couch,&nbsp;Mary Jetha,&nbsp;Donna M Dryden,&nbsp;Nicola Hooten,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Liang,&nbsp;Tamara Durec,&nbsp;Elizabeth Sumamo,&nbsp;Carol Spooner,&nbsp;Andrea Milne,&nbsp;Kate O'Gorman,&nbsp;Terry P Klassen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of diabetes education on metabolic control, diabetes-related hospitalizations, complications, and knowledge, quality of life and other psychosocial outcomes for children with type 1 diabetes and their families.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic and comprehensive literature review was conducted in 21 electronic databases of medical and health education literature to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating the effectiveness of diabetes education.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted independently by several investigators in duplicate. A descriptive analysis is presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 12,756 citations, 80 studies were identified and included in the review (53 RCTs or CCTs, 27 observational studies). The methodological quality of studies was generally low. Most studies (35/52) that examined the effect of educational interventions on HbA1c found no evidence of increased effectiveness of the interventions over the education provided as part of standard care. Successful interventions were heterogeneous and included cognitive behavioral therapy, family therapy, skills training and general diabetes education. Most studies reported a positive effect on health service utilization (i.e., reduced use), although less than half were statistically significant. There was no clear evidence that educational interventions had an effect on short-term complications. The effect of educational interventions on diabetes knowledge was unclear with 12/30 studies reporting a significant improvement. Interventions which had varying effects on knowledge scores included diabetes camp, general diabetes education, and cognitive behavioral therapy. In the area of self management/regimen adherence, 10/21 studies reported improving this outcome significantly. Successful interventions included general diabetes education and cognitive behavioral therapy. Educational interventions were successful in improving various psychosocial outcomes. The results of two studies examining refinements to intensive therapy education suggest that educational interventions may enhance the effects of intensive diabetes management in reducing HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS Due to the heterogeneity of reported diabetes education interventions, outcome measures, and duration of followup, there is insufficient evidence to identify a particular intervention that is more effective than standard care to improve diabetes control or quality of life or to reduce short-term complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":72991,"journal":{"name":"Evidence report/technology assessment","volume":" 166","pages":"1-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diabetes education for children with type 1 diabetes mellitus and their families.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Couch,&nbsp;Mary Jetha,&nbsp;Donna M Dryden,&nbsp;Nicola Hooten,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Liang,&nbsp;Tamara Durec,&nbsp;Elizabeth Sumamo,&nbsp;Carol Spooner,&nbsp;Andrea Milne,&nbsp;Kate O'Gorman,&nbsp;Terry P Klassen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of diabetes education on metabolic control, diabetes-related hospitalizations, complications, and knowledge, quality of life and other psychosocial outcomes for children with type 1 diabetes and their families.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic and comprehensive literature review was conducted in 21 electronic databases of medical and health education literature to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating the effectiveness of diabetes education.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted independently by several investigators in duplicate. A descriptive analysis is presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 12,756 citations, 80 studies were identified and included in the review (53 RCTs or CCTs, 27 observational studies). The methodological quality of studies was generally low. Most studies (35/52) that examined the effect of educational interventions on HbA1c found no evidence of increased effectiveness of the interventions over the education provided as part of standard care. Successful interventions were heterogeneous and included cognitive behavioral therapy, family therapy, skills training and general diabetes education. Most studies reported a positive effect on health service utilization (i.e., reduced use), although less than half were statistically significant. There was no clear evidence that educational interventions had an effect on short-term complications. The effect of educational interventions on diabetes knowledge was unclear with 12/30 studies reporting a significant improvement. Interventions which had varying effects on knowledge scores included diabetes camp, general diabetes education, and cognitive behavioral therapy. In the area of self management/regimen adherence, 10/21 studies reported improving this outcome significantly. Successful interventions included general diabetes education and cognitive behavioral therapy. Educational interventions were successful in improving various psychosocial outcomes. The results of two studies examining refinements to intensive therapy education suggest that educational interventions may enhance the effects of intensive diabetes management in reducing HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS Due to the heterogeneity of reported diabetes education interventions, outcome measures, and duration of followup, there is insufficient evidence to identify a particular intervention that is more effective than standard care to improve diabetes control or quality of life or to reduce short-term complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence report/technology assessment\",\"volume\":\" 166\",\"pages\":\"1-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781150/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence report/technology assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence report/technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定糖尿病教育在1型糖尿病儿童及其家庭的代谢控制、糖尿病相关住院、并发症、知识、生活质量和其他社会心理结局方面的有效性。资料来源:对21个医学和健康教育文献电子数据库进行系统、全面的文献综述,以确定评估糖尿病教育有效性的随机对照试验(rct)和观察性研究。综述方法:研究选择、质量评估和数据提取由多位研究者独立进行,一式两份。提出了一种描述性分析。结果:从12756次引用中,80项研究被确定并纳入本综述(53项随机对照试验或随机对照试验,27项观察性研究)。研究的方法学质量普遍较低。大多数研究(35/52)检查了教育干预对HbA1c的影响,没有证据表明干预比作为标准治疗的一部分提供的教育更有效。成功的干预包括认知行为治疗、家庭治疗、技能培训和普通糖尿病教育。大多数研究报告了对保健服务利用的积极影响(即减少使用),尽管只有不到一半具有统计意义。没有明确的证据表明教育干预对短期并发症有影响。教育干预对糖尿病知识的影响尚不清楚,有12/30的研究报告有显著改善。对知识得分有不同影响的干预措施包括糖尿病训练营、糖尿病普通教育和认知行为治疗。在自我管理/方案依从性方面,10/21的研究报告显着改善了这一结果。成功的干预措施包括普通糖尿病教育和认知行为治疗。教育干预在改善各种社会心理结果方面取得了成功。两项关于强化治疗教育改进的研究结果表明,教育干预可能增强强化糖尿病管理在降低HbA1c方面的效果。结论:由于报道的糖尿病教育干预措施、结果测量和随访时间的异质性,没有足够的证据表明某一特定的干预措施在改善糖尿病控制或生活质量或减少短期并发症方面比标准护理更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diabetes education for children with type 1 diabetes mellitus and their families.

Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of diabetes education on metabolic control, diabetes-related hospitalizations, complications, and knowledge, quality of life and other psychosocial outcomes for children with type 1 diabetes and their families.

Data sources: A systematic and comprehensive literature review was conducted in 21 electronic databases of medical and health education literature to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating the effectiveness of diabetes education.

Review methods: Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted independently by several investigators in duplicate. A descriptive analysis is presented.

Results: From 12,756 citations, 80 studies were identified and included in the review (53 RCTs or CCTs, 27 observational studies). The methodological quality of studies was generally low. Most studies (35/52) that examined the effect of educational interventions on HbA1c found no evidence of increased effectiveness of the interventions over the education provided as part of standard care. Successful interventions were heterogeneous and included cognitive behavioral therapy, family therapy, skills training and general diabetes education. Most studies reported a positive effect on health service utilization (i.e., reduced use), although less than half were statistically significant. There was no clear evidence that educational interventions had an effect on short-term complications. The effect of educational interventions on diabetes knowledge was unclear with 12/30 studies reporting a significant improvement. Interventions which had varying effects on knowledge scores included diabetes camp, general diabetes education, and cognitive behavioral therapy. In the area of self management/regimen adherence, 10/21 studies reported improving this outcome significantly. Successful interventions included general diabetes education and cognitive behavioral therapy. Educational interventions were successful in improving various psychosocial outcomes. The results of two studies examining refinements to intensive therapy education suggest that educational interventions may enhance the effects of intensive diabetes management in reducing HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS Due to the heterogeneity of reported diabetes education interventions, outcome measures, and duration of followup, there is insufficient evidence to identify a particular intervention that is more effective than standard care to improve diabetes control or quality of life or to reduce short-term complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信