辅助生殖技术(ART)的有效性。

Evan R Myers, Douglas C McCrory, Alyssa A Mills, Thomas M Price, Geeta K Swamy, Julierut Tantibhedhyangkul, Jennifer M Wu, David B Matchar
{"title":"辅助生殖技术(ART)的有效性。","authors":"Evan R Myers,&nbsp;Douglas C McCrory,&nbsp;Alyssa A Mills,&nbsp;Thomas M Price,&nbsp;Geeta K Swamy,&nbsp;Julierut Tantibhedhyangkul,&nbsp;Jennifer M Wu,&nbsp;David B Matchar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We reviewed the evidence regarding the outcomes of interventions used in ovulation induction, superovulation, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) for the treatment of infertility. Short-term outcomes included pregnancy, live birth, multiple gestation, and complications. Long-term outcomes included pregnancy and post-pregnancy complications for both mothers and infants.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE and Cochrane Collaboration resources.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>We included studies published in English from January 2000 through January 2008. For short-term outcomes, we excluded non-randomized studies and studies where a pregnancy or live birth rate per subject could not be calculated. For long-term outcomes, we excluded studies with fewer than 100 subjects and those without a control group. Articles were abstracted for relevant details, and relative risks or odds ratios, with 95 percent confidence intervals, were calculated for outcomes of interest for each study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 5294 abstracts and (for the three questions discussed in this draft report) reviewed 1210 full-text articles and included 478 articles for abstraction. Approximately 80 percent of the included studies were performed outside the United States. The majority of randomized trials were not designed to detect differences in pregnancy and live birth rates; reporting of delivery rates and obstetric outcomes was unusual. Most did not have sufficient power to detect clinically meaningful differences in live birth rates, and had still lower power to detect differences in less frequent outcomes such as multiple births and complications. Interventions for which there was sufficient evidence to demonstrate improved pregnancy or live birth rates included: (a) administration of clomiphene citrate in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome, (b) metformin plus clomiphene in women who fail to respond to clomiphene alone; (c) ultrasound-guided embryo transfer, and transfer on day 5 post-fertilization, in couples with a good prognosis; and (d) assisted hatching in couples with previous IVF failure. There was insufficient evidence regarding other interventions. Infertility itself is associated with most of the adverse longer-term outcomes. Consistently, infants born after infertility treatments are at risk for complications associated with abnormal implantation or placentation; the degree to which this is due to the underlying infertility, treatment, or both is unclear. Infertility, but not infertility treatment, is associated with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the large emotional and economic burden resulting from infertility, there is relatively little high-quality evidence to support the choice of specific interventions. Removing barriers to conducting appropriately designed studies should be a major policy goal.</p>","PeriodicalId":72991,"journal":{"name":"Evidence report/technology assessment","volume":" 167","pages":"1-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of assisted reproductive technology (ART).\",\"authors\":\"Evan R Myers,&nbsp;Douglas C McCrory,&nbsp;Alyssa A Mills,&nbsp;Thomas M Price,&nbsp;Geeta K Swamy,&nbsp;Julierut Tantibhedhyangkul,&nbsp;Jennifer M Wu,&nbsp;David B Matchar\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We reviewed the evidence regarding the outcomes of interventions used in ovulation induction, superovulation, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) for the treatment of infertility. Short-term outcomes included pregnancy, live birth, multiple gestation, and complications. Long-term outcomes included pregnancy and post-pregnancy complications for both mothers and infants.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE and Cochrane Collaboration resources.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>We included studies published in English from January 2000 through January 2008. For short-term outcomes, we excluded non-randomized studies and studies where a pregnancy or live birth rate per subject could not be calculated. For long-term outcomes, we excluded studies with fewer than 100 subjects and those without a control group. Articles were abstracted for relevant details, and relative risks or odds ratios, with 95 percent confidence intervals, were calculated for outcomes of interest for each study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 5294 abstracts and (for the three questions discussed in this draft report) reviewed 1210 full-text articles and included 478 articles for abstraction. Approximately 80 percent of the included studies were performed outside the United States. The majority of randomized trials were not designed to detect differences in pregnancy and live birth rates; reporting of delivery rates and obstetric outcomes was unusual. Most did not have sufficient power to detect clinically meaningful differences in live birth rates, and had still lower power to detect differences in less frequent outcomes such as multiple births and complications. Interventions for which there was sufficient evidence to demonstrate improved pregnancy or live birth rates included: (a) administration of clomiphene citrate in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome, (b) metformin plus clomiphene in women who fail to respond to clomiphene alone; (c) ultrasound-guided embryo transfer, and transfer on day 5 post-fertilization, in couples with a good prognosis; and (d) assisted hatching in couples with previous IVF failure. There was insufficient evidence regarding other interventions. Infertility itself is associated with most of the adverse longer-term outcomes. Consistently, infants born after infertility treatments are at risk for complications associated with abnormal implantation or placentation; the degree to which this is due to the underlying infertility, treatment, or both is unclear. Infertility, but not infertility treatment, is associated with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the large emotional and economic burden resulting from infertility, there is relatively little high-quality evidence to support the choice of specific interventions. Removing barriers to conducting appropriately designed studies should be a major policy goal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence report/technology assessment\",\"volume\":\" 167\",\"pages\":\"1-195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781485/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence report/technology assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence report/technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们回顾了有关促排卵、超排卵和体外受精(IVF)治疗不孕症的干预结果的证据。短期结果包括妊娠、活产、多胎妊娠和并发症。长期结果包括母亲和婴儿的妊娠和妊娠后并发症。数据来源:MEDLINE和Cochrane协作资源。回顾方法:我们纳入了2000年1月至2008年1月间发表的英文研究。对于短期结果,我们排除了非随机研究和无法计算每个受试者的怀孕率或活产率的研究。对于长期结果,我们排除了少于100名受试者和没有对照组的研究。对文章进行相关细节的摘要,并对每项研究的相关结果计算相对风险或优势比,置信区间为95%。结果:我们确定了5294篇摘要,(针对本报告草稿中讨论的三个问题)审查了1210篇全文文章,并纳入了478篇文章进行摘要。大约80%的纳入研究是在美国以外进行的。大多数随机试验的设计并不是为了检测怀孕率和活产率的差异;报告分娩率和产科结果是不寻常的。大多数没有足够的能力来检测活产率的临床有意义的差异,并且在检测多胎和并发症等不常见结果的差异方面的能力更低。有充分证据证明妊娠率或活产率改善的干预措施包括:(a)多囊卵巢综合征妇女服用枸橼酸克罗米芬,(b)对单独服用克罗米芬无效的妇女服用二甲双胍加克罗米芬;(c)超声引导胚胎移植,对预后良好的夫妇在受精后第5天进行移植;(d)协助先前IVF失败的夫妇孵化。关于其他干预措施的证据不足。不孕症本身与大多数不良的长期结果有关。一贯地,不孕症治疗后出生的婴儿有与异常着床或胎盘相关的并发症的风险;这在多大程度上是由于潜在的不孕症,治疗,或两者兼而有之尚不清楚。不孕不育,而不是不孕不育治疗,与乳腺癌和卵巢癌的风险增加有关。结论:尽管不孕不育造成了巨大的情感和经济负担,但支持选择特定干预措施的高质量证据相对较少。消除进行适当设计的研究的障碍应该是一个主要的政策目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Objectives: We reviewed the evidence regarding the outcomes of interventions used in ovulation induction, superovulation, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) for the treatment of infertility. Short-term outcomes included pregnancy, live birth, multiple gestation, and complications. Long-term outcomes included pregnancy and post-pregnancy complications for both mothers and infants.

Data sources: MEDLINE and Cochrane Collaboration resources.

Review methods: We included studies published in English from January 2000 through January 2008. For short-term outcomes, we excluded non-randomized studies and studies where a pregnancy or live birth rate per subject could not be calculated. For long-term outcomes, we excluded studies with fewer than 100 subjects and those without a control group. Articles were abstracted for relevant details, and relative risks or odds ratios, with 95 percent confidence intervals, were calculated for outcomes of interest for each study.

Results: We identified 5294 abstracts and (for the three questions discussed in this draft report) reviewed 1210 full-text articles and included 478 articles for abstraction. Approximately 80 percent of the included studies were performed outside the United States. The majority of randomized trials were not designed to detect differences in pregnancy and live birth rates; reporting of delivery rates and obstetric outcomes was unusual. Most did not have sufficient power to detect clinically meaningful differences in live birth rates, and had still lower power to detect differences in less frequent outcomes such as multiple births and complications. Interventions for which there was sufficient evidence to demonstrate improved pregnancy or live birth rates included: (a) administration of clomiphene citrate in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome, (b) metformin plus clomiphene in women who fail to respond to clomiphene alone; (c) ultrasound-guided embryo transfer, and transfer on day 5 post-fertilization, in couples with a good prognosis; and (d) assisted hatching in couples with previous IVF failure. There was insufficient evidence regarding other interventions. Infertility itself is associated with most of the adverse longer-term outcomes. Consistently, infants born after infertility treatments are at risk for complications associated with abnormal implantation or placentation; the degree to which this is due to the underlying infertility, treatment, or both is unclear. Infertility, but not infertility treatment, is associated with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

Conclusions: Despite the large emotional and economic burden resulting from infertility, there is relatively little high-quality evidence to support the choice of specific interventions. Removing barriers to conducting appropriately designed studies should be a major policy goal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信