{"title":"遗传外展教育的影响和支持初级保健对从业者的信心和能力在处理家族癌症。","authors":"J Bethea, N Qureshi, N Drury, P Guilbert","doi":"10.1159/000121400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine the level of competence and confidence in general practice in relation to the management of familial cancers and to determine the impact of providing genetic educational outreach on confidence and competence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Confidence and competence in dealing with familial cancers was measured using a postal questionnaire sent to all general practitioners and practice nurses in 4 geographical areas in central England. In 2 areas, genetic educational outreach was provided to 10 randomly selected practices and a matched analysis of questionnaire responses before and after intervention was done to determine the impact of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents were more confident in dealing with patient queries around familial breast cancer risk than those around bowel cancer. This was inconsistent with the ability to correctly assign familial risk, with 48% incorrectly assigning a high-risk categorisation to a low-risk breast cancer scenario. Respondents who had taken part in the intervention reported more confidence in dealing with issues related to the management of patient queries around bowel cancer. Following intervention, participants were more likely to report feeling confident in knowing the relevant family history to collect (72.4% of respondents from participating practices compared to 56.1% from non-participating practices; OR 2.39, p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.14-5.00) and in making a basic assessment of risk (72.4% compared to 38.9%; OR 3.65, p = 0.01, 95% CI 1.38-9.61).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing genetic educational outreach has a positive impact upon how confident primary care staff feel in dealing with patient queries over familial cancers, particularly in relation to bowel cancer. Further research is needed to explore the impact of providing this service on other relevant outcomes such as appropriateness of referrals to genetic services.</p>","PeriodicalId":80975,"journal":{"name":"Community genetics","volume":"11 5","pages":"289-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000121400","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of genetic outreach education and support to primary care on practitioner's confidence and competence in dealing with familial cancers.\",\"authors\":\"J Bethea, N Qureshi, N Drury, P Guilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000121400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine the level of competence and confidence in general practice in relation to the management of familial cancers and to determine the impact of providing genetic educational outreach on confidence and competence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Confidence and competence in dealing with familial cancers was measured using a postal questionnaire sent to all general practitioners and practice nurses in 4 geographical areas in central England. In 2 areas, genetic educational outreach was provided to 10 randomly selected practices and a matched analysis of questionnaire responses before and after intervention was done to determine the impact of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents were more confident in dealing with patient queries around familial breast cancer risk than those around bowel cancer. This was inconsistent with the ability to correctly assign familial risk, with 48% incorrectly assigning a high-risk categorisation to a low-risk breast cancer scenario. Respondents who had taken part in the intervention reported more confidence in dealing with issues related to the management of patient queries around bowel cancer. Following intervention, participants were more likely to report feeling confident in knowing the relevant family history to collect (72.4% of respondents from participating practices compared to 56.1% from non-participating practices; OR 2.39, p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.14-5.00) and in making a basic assessment of risk (72.4% compared to 38.9%; OR 3.65, p = 0.01, 95% CI 1.38-9.61).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing genetic educational outreach has a positive impact upon how confident primary care staff feel in dealing with patient queries over familial cancers, particularly in relation to bowel cancer. Further research is needed to explore the impact of providing this service on other relevant outcomes such as appropriateness of referrals to genetic services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community genetics\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"289-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000121400\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000121400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2008/5/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000121400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
摘要
目的:确定与家族性癌症管理相关的全科医生的能力和信心水平,并确定提供遗传教育对信心和能力的影响。方法:对英格兰中部4个地理区域的全科医生和执业护士进行邮寄问卷调查,测量他们处理家族性癌症的信心和能力。在两个地区,随机选择10个实践进行遗传教育推广,并对干预前后的问卷调查结果进行匹配分析,以确定干预的影响。结果:受访者在处理患者关于家族性乳腺癌风险的问题时比肠癌的问题更有信心。这与正确分配家族风险的能力不一致,48%的人错误地将高风险分类分配给低风险乳腺癌情景。参与干预的受访者报告说,在处理与肠癌患者询问管理相关的问题时,他们更有信心。干预后,参与者更有可能报告对收集相关家族史有信心(参与实践的受访者占72.4%,而非参与实践的受访者占56.1%;OR 2.39, p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.14-5.00)和进行基本风险评估(72.4%比38.9%;OR 3.65, p = 0.01, 95% CI 1.38 ~ 9.61)。结论:提供遗传教育外展对初级保健人员在处理家族性癌症,特别是与肠癌有关的患者询问时的信心有积极的影响。需要进一步的研究来探索提供这项服务对其他相关结果的影响,例如转介到遗传服务的适当性。
The impact of genetic outreach education and support to primary care on practitioner's confidence and competence in dealing with familial cancers.
Aims: To determine the level of competence and confidence in general practice in relation to the management of familial cancers and to determine the impact of providing genetic educational outreach on confidence and competence.
Methods: Confidence and competence in dealing with familial cancers was measured using a postal questionnaire sent to all general practitioners and practice nurses in 4 geographical areas in central England. In 2 areas, genetic educational outreach was provided to 10 randomly selected practices and a matched analysis of questionnaire responses before and after intervention was done to determine the impact of the intervention.
Results: Respondents were more confident in dealing with patient queries around familial breast cancer risk than those around bowel cancer. This was inconsistent with the ability to correctly assign familial risk, with 48% incorrectly assigning a high-risk categorisation to a low-risk breast cancer scenario. Respondents who had taken part in the intervention reported more confidence in dealing with issues related to the management of patient queries around bowel cancer. Following intervention, participants were more likely to report feeling confident in knowing the relevant family history to collect (72.4% of respondents from participating practices compared to 56.1% from non-participating practices; OR 2.39, p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.14-5.00) and in making a basic assessment of risk (72.4% compared to 38.9%; OR 3.65, p = 0.01, 95% CI 1.38-9.61).
Conclusions: Providing genetic educational outreach has a positive impact upon how confident primary care staff feel in dealing with patient queries over familial cancers, particularly in relation to bowel cancer. Further research is needed to explore the impact of providing this service on other relevant outcomes such as appropriateness of referrals to genetic services.