[医学话语与诗歌实践:埃皮奈夫人与加利亚尼修道院院长通信中的不同权威人物]。

Renaud Redien-Collot
{"title":"[医学话语与诗歌实践:埃皮奈夫人与加利亚尼修道院院长通信中的不同权威人物]。","authors":"Renaud Redien-Collot","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Letters containing medical data are not simple texts. They stem from a writing process which sees the authors constantly review the way they perceive both their bodies and the way they write. In order to limit the relativism inherent to such processes and reduce the ensuing variability of perspectives, most letter writers eventually assume a form of authority. In the second part of the 18th Century, the correspondence between the abbey Galliano and Mme D'Epinay reveals that while they exchanged details about their health, they also experimented with different positions of authority and adapted their writing process as the relationship evolved. This a salutary lesson for modern researchers who are often tempted to reduce the problematic meaning of the letter writing process, defining the letter as an isolated document. Medical correspondence is exemplary in this respect because it requires a certain level of knowledge and the expression of a certain intimacy, entailing the adoption of one or of several forms of authority.</p>","PeriodicalId":81976,"journal":{"name":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte. Beiheft : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","volume":"29 ","pages":"95-109, 264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Medical discourse and poetical practice: the different figures of authority within the correspondance between Mme d'Epinay and the abbé Galiani].\",\"authors\":\"Renaud Redien-Collot\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Letters containing medical data are not simple texts. They stem from a writing process which sees the authors constantly review the way they perceive both their bodies and the way they write. In order to limit the relativism inherent to such processes and reduce the ensuing variability of perspectives, most letter writers eventually assume a form of authority. In the second part of the 18th Century, the correspondence between the abbey Galliano and Mme D'Epinay reveals that while they exchanged details about their health, they also experimented with different positions of authority and adapted their writing process as the relationship evolved. This a salutary lesson for modern researchers who are often tempted to reduce the problematic meaning of the letter writing process, defining the letter as an isolated document. Medical correspondence is exemplary in this respect because it requires a certain level of knowledge and the expression of a certain intimacy, entailing the adoption of one or of several forms of authority.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte. Beiheft : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"95-109, 264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte. Beiheft : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte. Beiheft : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

包含医疗数据的信件不是简单的文本。它们源于一个写作过程,在这个过程中,作者不断地审视他们对自己身体和写作方式的看法。为了限制这些过程中固有的相对主义,减少随之而来的观点的可变性,大多数信件的作者最终都以一种权威的形式出现。在18世纪下半叶,修道院加利亚诺和德伊皮奈夫人之间的通信显示,他们在交换健康细节的同时,也尝试了不同的权威职位,并随着关系的发展调整了他们的写作过程。这对现代研究人员来说是一个有益的教训,他们经常试图减少信件写作过程的问题意义,将信件定义为一个孤立的文件。医学通信在这方面是典型的,因为它需要一定程度的知识和一定程度的亲密关系,需要采用一种或几种形式的权威。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Medical discourse and poetical practice: the different figures of authority within the correspondance between Mme d'Epinay and the abbé Galiani].

Letters containing medical data are not simple texts. They stem from a writing process which sees the authors constantly review the way they perceive both their bodies and the way they write. In order to limit the relativism inherent to such processes and reduce the ensuing variability of perspectives, most letter writers eventually assume a form of authority. In the second part of the 18th Century, the correspondence between the abbey Galliano and Mme D'Epinay reveals that while they exchanged details about their health, they also experimented with different positions of authority and adapted their writing process as the relationship evolved. This a salutary lesson for modern researchers who are often tempted to reduce the problematic meaning of the letter writing process, defining the letter as an isolated document. Medical correspondence is exemplary in this respect because it requires a certain level of knowledge and the expression of a certain intimacy, entailing the adoption of one or of several forms of authority.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信