医生与老年患者互动期间的生活方式讨论:时间在医疗接触中的作用。

Marcia G Ory, B Mitchell Peck, Colette Browning, Samuel N Forjuoh
{"title":"医生与老年患者互动期间的生活方式讨论:时间在医疗接触中的作用。","authors":"Marcia G Ory,&nbsp;B Mitchell Peck,&nbsp;Colette Browning,&nbsp;Samuel N Forjuoh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Although physician influence can be especially powerful with older adults, relatively little is known about how primary care physicians (PCPs) interact with their patients regarding lifestyle issues.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To document the length of time that PCPs discuss lifestyle issues with their older patients and to examine patient, physician, and contextual correlates.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive and multivariate analysis of videotapes of physician-patient encounters.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Medical encounters from 3 primary care ambulatory settings.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>There were 116 ongoing medical encounters with patients aged 65 years or older.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Total time spent in physical activity (PA) discussions and total time spent discussing PA, nutrition, and smoking during the medical encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Very little time was spent in lifestyle discussions. On average, PA was discussed for less than a minute (58.28 seconds) and nutrition for slightly less than 90 seconds (83.11 seconds). Only about 10% of the average 17-minute, 22-second encounter was spent on physical activity, nutrition, or smoking topics. Physician supportiveness score (beta = 8.92, P <or= .001) and the number of topics discussed (beta = 106.39, P <or= .001) were significantly correlated with the length of all lifestyle discussion. Lifestyle discussions were also more likely to occur during longer visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a critical need for additional training of primary care providers on how to discuss lifestyle issues in the most time-efficient but effective manner to achieve positive behavior change associated with improved health outcomes. There is also a need for the institutionalization of policies to encourage more lifestyle discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74137,"journal":{"name":"MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2234310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lifestyle discussions during doctor-older patient interactions: the role of time in the medical encounter.\",\"authors\":\"Marcia G Ory,&nbsp;B Mitchell Peck,&nbsp;Colette Browning,&nbsp;Samuel N Forjuoh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Although physician influence can be especially powerful with older adults, relatively little is known about how primary care physicians (PCPs) interact with their patients regarding lifestyle issues.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To document the length of time that PCPs discuss lifestyle issues with their older patients and to examine patient, physician, and contextual correlates.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive and multivariate analysis of videotapes of physician-patient encounters.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Medical encounters from 3 primary care ambulatory settings.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>There were 116 ongoing medical encounters with patients aged 65 years or older.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Total time spent in physical activity (PA) discussions and total time spent discussing PA, nutrition, and smoking during the medical encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Very little time was spent in lifestyle discussions. On average, PA was discussed for less than a minute (58.28 seconds) and nutrition for slightly less than 90 seconds (83.11 seconds). Only about 10% of the average 17-minute, 22-second encounter was spent on physical activity, nutrition, or smoking topics. Physician supportiveness score (beta = 8.92, P <or= .001) and the number of topics discussed (beta = 106.39, P <or= .001) were significantly correlated with the length of all lifestyle discussion. Lifestyle discussions were also more likely to occur during longer visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a critical need for additional training of primary care providers on how to discuss lifestyle issues in the most time-efficient but effective manner to achieve positive behavior change associated with improved health outcomes. There is also a need for the institutionalization of policies to encourage more lifestyle discussions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2234310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管医生对老年人的影响可能特别大,但人们对初级保健医生(pcp)如何与患者就生活方式问题进行互动知之甚少。目的:记录pcp与老年患者讨论生活方式问题的时间长度,并检查患者,医生和环境相关性。设计:对医患接触录像进行描述性和多变量分析。环境:来自3个初级保健门诊环境的医疗接触。患者:有116例正在进行的医疗接触,患者年龄在65岁或以上。主要结果测量:讨论身体活动(PA)的总时间,以及讨论PA、营养和吸烟的总时间。结果:讨论生活方式的时间很少。平均而言,PA的讨论时间不到1分钟(58.28秒),营养的讨论时间略少于90秒(83.11秒)。在平均17分22秒的会面中,只有大约10%的时间花在了体育活动、营养或吸烟话题上。结论:迫切需要对初级保健提供者进行额外培训,以了解如何以最及时有效的方式讨论生活方式问题,以实现与改善健康结果相关的积极行为改变。还需要将政策制度化,以鼓励更多关于生活方式的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lifestyle discussions during doctor-older patient interactions: the role of time in the medical encounter.

Context: Although physician influence can be especially powerful with older adults, relatively little is known about how primary care physicians (PCPs) interact with their patients regarding lifestyle issues.

Objective: To document the length of time that PCPs discuss lifestyle issues with their older patients and to examine patient, physician, and contextual correlates.

Design: Descriptive and multivariate analysis of videotapes of physician-patient encounters.

Setting: Medical encounters from 3 primary care ambulatory settings.

Patients: There were 116 ongoing medical encounters with patients aged 65 years or older.

Main outcome measures: Total time spent in physical activity (PA) discussions and total time spent discussing PA, nutrition, and smoking during the medical encounter.

Results: Very little time was spent in lifestyle discussions. On average, PA was discussed for less than a minute (58.28 seconds) and nutrition for slightly less than 90 seconds (83.11 seconds). Only about 10% of the average 17-minute, 22-second encounter was spent on physical activity, nutrition, or smoking topics. Physician supportiveness score (beta = 8.92, P

Conclusion: There is a critical need for additional training of primary care providers on how to discuss lifestyle issues in the most time-efficient but effective manner to achieve positive behavior change associated with improved health outcomes. There is also a need for the institutionalization of policies to encourage more lifestyle discussions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信