帕金森病的认知障碍:是一个统一的现象吗?

Anja Lowit, Peter Howell, Bettina Brendel
{"title":"帕金森病的认知障碍:是一个统一的现象吗?","authors":"Anja Lowit, Peter Howell, Bettina Brendel","doi":"10.1375/brim.2005.6.3.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parkinson's disease (PD) has long been associated with dementia. This has been found to correlate with participant age, age at onset of PD and severity of PD. In addition, a large corpus of research points to the fact that participants with, as well as without, dementia can be impaired in a variety of cognitive tasks. Among these, set-shifting and dual-tasking skills have received particular focus. Most studies report that a reduction in attentional resources can lead to problems with these tasks. However, none have been able to determine exactly which systems are involved in these skills and which neurological impairments underlie the observed cognitive deficits. The current study set out to investigate how performance on tasks requiring set-shifting and dual tasking related to each other, as well as overall measures of cognition gained across a variety of tasks. Fifteen participants with PD and 12 control participants underwent screening tests for dementia, as well as specific tests to assess attention, set-shifting and dual tasking. The results indicate that set-shifting ability correlated well with other measures of cognitive performance, whereas dual-tasking skills did not. This could suggest that set-shifting and dual tasking are not necessarily controlled by the same process, or that a particular process is involved to different degrees. In addition, many participants showed individual performance variations and dissociations between tasks that were not necessarily evident from the statistical analysis. This indicates that it can be difficult to make assumptions on overall cognitive performance from specific tasks and vice versa. This observation has implications for clinical practice as well as research methodology.</p>","PeriodicalId":519488,"journal":{"name":"Brain impairment : a multidisciplinary journal of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment","volume":"6 3","pages":"191-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2231610/pdf/nihms-979.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: Is It a Unified Phenomenon?\",\"authors\":\"Anja Lowit, Peter Howell, Bettina Brendel\",\"doi\":\"10.1375/brim.2005.6.3.191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Parkinson's disease (PD) has long been associated with dementia. This has been found to correlate with participant age, age at onset of PD and severity of PD. In addition, a large corpus of research points to the fact that participants with, as well as without, dementia can be impaired in a variety of cognitive tasks. Among these, set-shifting and dual-tasking skills have received particular focus. Most studies report that a reduction in attentional resources can lead to problems with these tasks. However, none have been able to determine exactly which systems are involved in these skills and which neurological impairments underlie the observed cognitive deficits. The current study set out to investigate how performance on tasks requiring set-shifting and dual tasking related to each other, as well as overall measures of cognition gained across a variety of tasks. Fifteen participants with PD and 12 control participants underwent screening tests for dementia, as well as specific tests to assess attention, set-shifting and dual tasking. The results indicate that set-shifting ability correlated well with other measures of cognitive performance, whereas dual-tasking skills did not. This could suggest that set-shifting and dual tasking are not necessarily controlled by the same process, or that a particular process is involved to different degrees. In addition, many participants showed individual performance variations and dissociations between tasks that were not necessarily evident from the statistical analysis. This indicates that it can be difficult to make assumptions on overall cognitive performance from specific tasks and vice versa. This observation has implications for clinical practice as well as research methodology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain impairment : a multidisciplinary journal of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"191-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2231610/pdf/nihms-979.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain impairment : a multidisciplinary journal of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1375/brim.2005.6.3.191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain impairment : a multidisciplinary journal of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/brim.2005.6.3.191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,人们一直将帕金森病(PD)与痴呆症联系在一起。研究发现,这与参与者的年龄、PD发病年龄和PD的严重程度有关。此外,大量的研究表明,无论是否患有痴呆症,参与者在各种认知任务中都会受到损害。其中,设置转换和双重任务技能受到特别关注。大多数研究表明,注意力资源的减少会导致这些任务出现问题。然而,没有人能够确切地确定哪些系统参与了这些技能,哪些神经损伤是观察到的认知缺陷的基础。目前的研究旨在调查需要转换任务和双重任务的任务表现如何相互关联,以及在各种任务中获得的认知的总体衡量标准。15名帕金森病患者和12名对照组接受了痴呆症筛查测试,以及评估注意力、设定转移和双重任务的特定测试。结果表明,设置转换能力与认知表现的其他指标有很好的相关性,而双重任务技能则没有。这可能表明,设置转移和双重任务不一定是由同一过程控制的,或者一个特定的过程在不同程度上参与其中。此外,许多参与者表现出个人表现的差异和任务之间的分离,这在统计分析中并不一定明显。这表明很难对特定任务的整体认知表现做出假设,反之亦然。这一观察结果对临床实践和研究方法都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: Is It a Unified Phenomenon?

Parkinson's disease (PD) has long been associated with dementia. This has been found to correlate with participant age, age at onset of PD and severity of PD. In addition, a large corpus of research points to the fact that participants with, as well as without, dementia can be impaired in a variety of cognitive tasks. Among these, set-shifting and dual-tasking skills have received particular focus. Most studies report that a reduction in attentional resources can lead to problems with these tasks. However, none have been able to determine exactly which systems are involved in these skills and which neurological impairments underlie the observed cognitive deficits. The current study set out to investigate how performance on tasks requiring set-shifting and dual tasking related to each other, as well as overall measures of cognition gained across a variety of tasks. Fifteen participants with PD and 12 control participants underwent screening tests for dementia, as well as specific tests to assess attention, set-shifting and dual tasking. The results indicate that set-shifting ability correlated well with other measures of cognitive performance, whereas dual-tasking skills did not. This could suggest that set-shifting and dual tasking are not necessarily controlled by the same process, or that a particular process is involved to different degrees. In addition, many participants showed individual performance variations and dissociations between tasks that were not necessarily evident from the statistical analysis. This indicates that it can be difficult to make assumptions on overall cognitive performance from specific tasks and vice versa. This observation has implications for clinical practice as well as research methodology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信