{"title":"[市场许可授权:医疗法律影响]。","authors":"F Claudot, Y Juillière, H Coudane","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Respecting market licensing authorisation recommendations is a prudent and preventive policy in respect of professional liability, but is not sufficient to avoid all of the doctor's responsibility. Conversely, not respecting the recommendations or off-indication prescribing does not necessarily make the practitioner liable. Although neither the recommendations, nor the market licensing authorisation are legally binding for the cardiologist, they can be invoked during a lawsuit. For this reason it seemed appropriate for us to study the medico-legal impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":8144,"journal":{"name":"Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux","volume":"100 12","pages":"1003-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Market licensing authorisation: medico-legal impact].\",\"authors\":\"F Claudot, Y Juillière, H Coudane\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Respecting market licensing authorisation recommendations is a prudent and preventive policy in respect of professional liability, but is not sufficient to avoid all of the doctor's responsibility. Conversely, not respecting the recommendations or off-indication prescribing does not necessarily make the practitioner liable. Although neither the recommendations, nor the market licensing authorisation are legally binding for the cardiologist, they can be invoked during a lawsuit. For this reason it seemed appropriate for us to study the medico-legal impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux\",\"volume\":\"100 12\",\"pages\":\"1003-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Respecting market licensing authorisation recommendations is a prudent and preventive policy in respect of professional liability, but is not sufficient to avoid all of the doctor's responsibility. Conversely, not respecting the recommendations or off-indication prescribing does not necessarily make the practitioner liable. Although neither the recommendations, nor the market licensing authorisation are legally binding for the cardiologist, they can be invoked during a lawsuit. For this reason it seemed appropriate for us to study the medico-legal impact.