加强基层医疗机构的慢性阻塞性肺病管理。

Jill A Foster, Barbara P Yawn, Abdolrasulnia Maziar, Todd Jenkins, Stephen I Rennard, Linda Casebeer
{"title":"加强基层医疗机构的慢性阻塞性肺病管理。","authors":"Jill A Foster, Barbara P Yawn, Abdolrasulnia Maziar, Todd Jenkins, Stephen I Rennard, Linda Casebeer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Primary care physicians provide care for the majority of patients with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although clinical practice guidelines have been developed for COPD, their influence on primary care practice is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine primary care decision making, perceptions, and educational needs relating to COPD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey centered on COPD case-vignettes was developed and distributed to a random sample of physicians in adult primary care specialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 943 respondents, 784 practicing primary care physicians were used in analysis. On average, physicians estimated that 12% of their patients had COPD. Although 55% of physicians were aware of major COPD guidelines, only 25% used them to guide decision-making. Self-identified guidelines showed that users were more likely to order spirometry for subtle respiratory symptoms (74% vs 63%, P < .01), to initiate therapy for mild symptoms (86% vs. 77%, P < .01), and to choose long-acting bronchodilators for persistent dyspnea (50% vs 32%, P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Practice guidelines and CME programs are both valued resources, but have not yet adequately reached many physicians. Because guidelines appear to influence clinical decision-making, efforts to disseminate them more broadly are needed. Future education should present COPD assessment algorithms tailored to primary care settings, assess and strengthen spirometry interpretation skills, and discuss a reasoned approach to medication management. Patient-centered content that accurately reflects the nature of primary care practice may enhance physician's learning experience. Internet-based and distance learning formats may be essential for reaching physicians in many high-need areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":74137,"journal":{"name":"MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine","volume":"9 3","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2100091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing COPD management in primary care settings.\",\"authors\":\"Jill A Foster, Barbara P Yawn, Abdolrasulnia Maziar, Todd Jenkins, Stephen I Rennard, Linda Casebeer\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Primary care physicians provide care for the majority of patients with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although clinical practice guidelines have been developed for COPD, their influence on primary care practice is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine primary care decision making, perceptions, and educational needs relating to COPD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey centered on COPD case-vignettes was developed and distributed to a random sample of physicians in adult primary care specialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 943 respondents, 784 practicing primary care physicians were used in analysis. On average, physicians estimated that 12% of their patients had COPD. Although 55% of physicians were aware of major COPD guidelines, only 25% used them to guide decision-making. Self-identified guidelines showed that users were more likely to order spirometry for subtle respiratory symptoms (74% vs 63%, P < .01), to initiate therapy for mild symptoms (86% vs. 77%, P < .01), and to choose long-acting bronchodilators for persistent dyspnea (50% vs 32%, P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Practice guidelines and CME programs are both valued resources, but have not yet adequately reached many physicians. Because guidelines appear to influence clinical decision-making, efforts to disseminate them more broadly are needed. Future education should present COPD assessment algorithms tailored to primary care settings, assess and strengthen spirometry interpretation skills, and discuss a reasoned approach to medication management. Patient-centered content that accurately reflects the nature of primary care practice may enhance physician's learning experience. Internet-based and distance learning formats may be essential for reaching physicians in many high-need areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2100091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数轻度至中度慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者都由初级保健医生提供治疗。虽然已经制定了慢性阻塞性肺病临床实践指南,但其对初级保健实践的影响尚不明确:研究与慢性阻塞性肺病相关的初级医疗决策、认知和教育需求:设计:以慢性阻塞性肺病病例为中心进行调查,并随机抽样分发给成人初级保健专科医生:在 943 名受访者中,有 784 名执业初级保健医生参与了分析。据医生估计,他们的病人中平均有 12% 患有慢性阻塞性肺病。尽管55%的医生知道主要的慢性阻塞性肺病指南,但只有25%的医生使用这些指南来指导决策。自我认定的指南显示,使用者更倾向于对细微的呼吸道症状进行肺活量测定(74% vs. 63%,P < .01),对轻微症状启动治疗(86% vs. 77%,P < .01),对持续性呼吸困难选择长效支气管扩张剂(50% vs. 32%,P < .01):实践指南和继续医学教育项目都是有价值的资源,但尚未充分惠及许多医生。由于指南似乎会影响临床决策,因此需要更广泛地传播指南。未来的教育应针对初级医疗机构提出慢性阻塞性肺病评估算法,评估和加强肺活量测定的解释技能,并讨论合理的药物管理方法。以患者为中心、准确反映初级医疗实践性质的内容可增强医生的学习体验。基于互联网的远程学习形式可能对许多高需求地区的医生至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing COPD management in primary care settings.

Context: Primary care physicians provide care for the majority of patients with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although clinical practice guidelines have been developed for COPD, their influence on primary care practice is unclear.

Objective: To examine primary care decision making, perceptions, and educational needs relating to COPD.

Design: A survey centered on COPD case-vignettes was developed and distributed to a random sample of physicians in adult primary care specialties.

Results: From 943 respondents, 784 practicing primary care physicians were used in analysis. On average, physicians estimated that 12% of their patients had COPD. Although 55% of physicians were aware of major COPD guidelines, only 25% used them to guide decision-making. Self-identified guidelines showed that users were more likely to order spirometry for subtle respiratory symptoms (74% vs 63%, P < .01), to initiate therapy for mild symptoms (86% vs. 77%, P < .01), and to choose long-acting bronchodilators for persistent dyspnea (50% vs 32%, P < .01).

Conclusions: Practice guidelines and CME programs are both valued resources, but have not yet adequately reached many physicians. Because guidelines appear to influence clinical decision-making, efforts to disseminate them more broadly are needed. Future education should present COPD assessment algorithms tailored to primary care settings, assess and strengthen spirometry interpretation skills, and discuss a reasoned approach to medication management. Patient-centered content that accurately reflects the nature of primary care practice may enhance physician's learning experience. Internet-based and distance learning formats may be essential for reaching physicians in many high-need areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信