Antonios Moralis, Martin Kunkel, Torsten Eugen Reichert, Hartwig Kosmehl, Oliver Driemel
{"title":"[通过刷状细胞学鉴定复发性口腔鳞状细胞癌]。","authors":"Antonios Moralis, Martin Kunkel, Torsten Eugen Reichert, Hartwig Kosmehl, Oliver Driemel","doi":"10.1007/s10006-007-0080-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large oral lesions comprise the risk that an incisional biopsy does not reveal the most aggressive site in spite of carefully selecting the place of biopsy.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>The first incisional biopsy of a large, clinically suspect, oral lesion could not identify the subepidermal spread of a recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma. Atypical cells obtained by a simultaneous brush biopsy prompted a renewed, incisional biopsy which finally established the diagnosis of a recurrent, oral squamous cell carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presented case emphasizes the value of brush biopsy in the follow-up of oral squamous cell carcinoma, especially in examination of oral lesions covering a large area.</p>","PeriodicalId":79515,"journal":{"name":"Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG","volume":"11 6","pages":"355-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10006-007-0080-6","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Identification of a recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma by brush cytology].\",\"authors\":\"Antonios Moralis, Martin Kunkel, Torsten Eugen Reichert, Hartwig Kosmehl, Oliver Driemel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10006-007-0080-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large oral lesions comprise the risk that an incisional biopsy does not reveal the most aggressive site in spite of carefully selecting the place of biopsy.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>The first incisional biopsy of a large, clinically suspect, oral lesion could not identify the subepidermal spread of a recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma. Atypical cells obtained by a simultaneous brush biopsy prompted a renewed, incisional biopsy which finally established the diagnosis of a recurrent, oral squamous cell carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presented case emphasizes the value of brush biopsy in the follow-up of oral squamous cell carcinoma, especially in examination of oral lesions covering a large area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG\",\"volume\":\"11 6\",\"pages\":\"355-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10006-007-0080-6\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-007-0080-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-007-0080-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Identification of a recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma by brush cytology].
Background: Large oral lesions comprise the risk that an incisional biopsy does not reveal the most aggressive site in spite of carefully selecting the place of biopsy.
Case report: The first incisional biopsy of a large, clinically suspect, oral lesion could not identify the subepidermal spread of a recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma. Atypical cells obtained by a simultaneous brush biopsy prompted a renewed, incisional biopsy which finally established the diagnosis of a recurrent, oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Conclusions: The presented case emphasizes the value of brush biopsy in the follow-up of oral squamous cell carcinoma, especially in examination of oral lesions covering a large area.