小细胞肺癌的治疗。

Jerome Seidenfeld, David J Samson, Claudia J Bonnell, Kathleen M Ziegler, Naomi Aronson
{"title":"小细胞肺癌的治疗。","authors":"Jerome Seidenfeld,&nbsp;David J Samson,&nbsp;Claudia J Bonnell,&nbsp;Kathleen M Ziegler,&nbsp;Naomi Aronson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This is a systematic review of evidence on issues in managing small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Key questions addressed are: the sequence, timing, and dosing characteristics of primary thoracic radiotherapy (TRTx) for limited-stage disease; primary TRTx for extensive-stage disease; effect of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI); positron emission tomography (PET) for staging; treatment of mixed histology tumors; surgery; and second- and subsequent-line treatment for relapsed/progressive disease.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Register</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>The review methods were defined prospectively in a written protocol. We sought randomized controlled trials that compared the interventions of interest. Where randomized trials were limited or nonexistent, we sought additional studies. We performed meta-analysis of studies that compared early and late TRTx.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest evidence available for this report is a patient-level meta-analysis showing that PCI improves survival of SCLC patients who achieved complete response following primary therapy from 15.3 percent to 20.7 percent (p=0.01). No other question yielded evidence so robust. The case for concurrent over sequential radiation delivery rests largely on a single multicenter trial. Support for early concurrent therapy comes from one multicenter trial, but two other multicenter trials found no advantage. Our meta-analysis did not find significant reductions in 2- and 3-year mortality for early TRTx. Favorable results from a single-center trial on TRTx for extensive stage disease need replication in a multicenter setting. For other questions (i.e., management of mixed histology disease; surgery for early limited SCLC), relevant comparative studies were nonexistent. PET may be more sensitive in detecting disease outside the brain than conventional staging modalities, but studies were of poor quality and reliable estimates of performance are not possible.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCI improves survival among those with a complete response to primary therapy. A research agenda is needed to optimize the effectiveness of TRTx and its components. PET for staging may be useful, but its role awaits clarification by rigorous studies. No relevant evidence was available to address management of mixed histology disease or surgery for early limited SCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72991,"journal":{"name":"Evidence report/technology assessment","volume":" 143","pages":"1-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of small cell lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jerome Seidenfeld,&nbsp;David J Samson,&nbsp;Claudia J Bonnell,&nbsp;Kathleen M Ziegler,&nbsp;Naomi Aronson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This is a systematic review of evidence on issues in managing small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Key questions addressed are: the sequence, timing, and dosing characteristics of primary thoracic radiotherapy (TRTx) for limited-stage disease; primary TRTx for extensive-stage disease; effect of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI); positron emission tomography (PET) for staging; treatment of mixed histology tumors; surgery; and second- and subsequent-line treatment for relapsed/progressive disease.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Register</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>The review methods were defined prospectively in a written protocol. We sought randomized controlled trials that compared the interventions of interest. Where randomized trials were limited or nonexistent, we sought additional studies. We performed meta-analysis of studies that compared early and late TRTx.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest evidence available for this report is a patient-level meta-analysis showing that PCI improves survival of SCLC patients who achieved complete response following primary therapy from 15.3 percent to 20.7 percent (p=0.01). No other question yielded evidence so robust. The case for concurrent over sequential radiation delivery rests largely on a single multicenter trial. Support for early concurrent therapy comes from one multicenter trial, but two other multicenter trials found no advantage. Our meta-analysis did not find significant reductions in 2- and 3-year mortality for early TRTx. Favorable results from a single-center trial on TRTx for extensive stage disease need replication in a multicenter setting. For other questions (i.e., management of mixed histology disease; surgery for early limited SCLC), relevant comparative studies were nonexistent. PET may be more sensitive in detecting disease outside the brain than conventional staging modalities, but studies were of poor quality and reliable estimates of performance are not possible.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCI improves survival among those with a complete response to primary therapy. A research agenda is needed to optimize the effectiveness of TRTx and its components. PET for staging may be useful, but its role awaits clarification by rigorous studies. No relevant evidence was available to address management of mixed histology disease or surgery for early limited SCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence report/technology assessment\",\"volume\":\" 143\",\"pages\":\"1-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781398/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence report/technology assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence report/technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这是一篇关于小细胞肺癌(SCLC)治疗问题的系统综述。解决的关键问题是:有限期疾病的初级胸部放疗(TRTx)的顺序、时间和剂量特征;原发性TRTx用于广泛期疾病;预防性颅脑照射(PCI)的效果;正电子发射断层扫描(PET)用于分期;混合组织学肿瘤的治疗;手术;以及复发/进展性疾病的二线和后续治疗。数据来源:MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane RegisterReview方法:前瞻性地在书面方案中定义综述方法。我们寻求随机对照试验来比较感兴趣的干预措施。在随机试验有限或不存在的情况下,我们寻求额外的研究。我们对比较早期和晚期TRTx的研究进行了荟萃分析。结果:该报告最有力的证据是一项患者水平的荟萃分析,显示PCI可将初次治疗后完全缓解的SCLC患者的生存率从15.3%提高到20.7% (p=0.01)。没有其他问题能提供如此有力的证据。并发放射治疗优于序贯放射治疗主要取决于一项多中心试验。一项多中心试验支持早期并发治疗,但另外两项多中心试验没有发现优势。我们的荟萃分析没有发现早期TRTx的2年和3年死亡率有显著降低。TRTx治疗大分期疾病单中心试验的有利结果需要在多中心环境中进行复制。对于其他问题(即混合性组织学疾病的处理;早期局限性小细胞肺癌的手术治疗),相关的比较研究尚无。PET在检测脑外疾病方面可能比传统的分期方式更敏感,但研究质量较差,无法对性能进行可靠的估计。结论:PCI改善了对初始治疗有完全反应的患者的生存率。需要制定一个研究议程,以优化TRTx及其组成部分的有效性。PET用于分期可能有用,但其作用有待于严格的研究来澄清。没有相关的证据可以解决混合组织学疾病或手术治疗早期局限性SCLC的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of small cell lung cancer.

Objectives: This is a systematic review of evidence on issues in managing small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Key questions addressed are: the sequence, timing, and dosing characteristics of primary thoracic radiotherapy (TRTx) for limited-stage disease; primary TRTx for extensive-stage disease; effect of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI); positron emission tomography (PET) for staging; treatment of mixed histology tumors; surgery; and second- and subsequent-line treatment for relapsed/progressive disease.

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Register

Review methods: The review methods were defined prospectively in a written protocol. We sought randomized controlled trials that compared the interventions of interest. Where randomized trials were limited or nonexistent, we sought additional studies. We performed meta-analysis of studies that compared early and late TRTx.

Results: The strongest evidence available for this report is a patient-level meta-analysis showing that PCI improves survival of SCLC patients who achieved complete response following primary therapy from 15.3 percent to 20.7 percent (p=0.01). No other question yielded evidence so robust. The case for concurrent over sequential radiation delivery rests largely on a single multicenter trial. Support for early concurrent therapy comes from one multicenter trial, but two other multicenter trials found no advantage. Our meta-analysis did not find significant reductions in 2- and 3-year mortality for early TRTx. Favorable results from a single-center trial on TRTx for extensive stage disease need replication in a multicenter setting. For other questions (i.e., management of mixed histology disease; surgery for early limited SCLC), relevant comparative studies were nonexistent. PET may be more sensitive in detecting disease outside the brain than conventional staging modalities, but studies were of poor quality and reliable estimates of performance are not possible.

Conclusions: PCI improves survival among those with a complete response to primary therapy. A research agenda is needed to optimize the effectiveness of TRTx and its components. PET for staging may be useful, but its role awaits clarification by rigorous studies. No relevant evidence was available to address management of mixed histology disease or surgery for early limited SCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信