平衡ROC分析(BAROC)方案用于评估蛋白质相似性

Róbert Busa-Fekete , Attila Kertész-Farkas , András Kocsor , Sándor Pongor
{"title":"平衡ROC分析(BAROC)方案用于评估蛋白质相似性","authors":"Róbert Busa-Fekete ,&nbsp;Attila Kertész-Farkas ,&nbsp;András Kocsor ,&nbsp;Sándor Pongor","doi":"10.1016/j.jbbm.2007.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Identification of problematic protein classes (domain types, protein families) that are difficult to predict from sequence is a key issue in genome annotation. ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis is routinely used for the evaluation of protein similarities, however its results – the area under curve (AUC) values – are differentially biased for the various protein classes that are highly different in size. We show the bias can be compensated for by adjusting the length of the top list in a class-dependent fashion, so that the number of negatives within the top list will be equal to (or proportional with) the size of the positive class. Using this balanced protocol the problematic classes can be identified by their AUC values, or by a scatter diagram in which the AUC values are plotted against positive/negative ratio of the top list. The use of likelihood-ratio scoring (Kaján et al, <em>Bioinformatics,</em> <strong>22</strong>, 2865–2869, 2007) the bias caused by class imbalance can be further decreased.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15257,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods","volume":"70 6","pages":"Pages 1210-1214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jbbm.2007.06.003","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balanced ROC analysis (BAROC) protocol for the evaluation of protein similarities\",\"authors\":\"Róbert Busa-Fekete ,&nbsp;Attila Kertész-Farkas ,&nbsp;András Kocsor ,&nbsp;Sándor Pongor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbbm.2007.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Identification of problematic protein classes (domain types, protein families) that are difficult to predict from sequence is a key issue in genome annotation. ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis is routinely used for the evaluation of protein similarities, however its results – the area under curve (AUC) values – are differentially biased for the various protein classes that are highly different in size. We show the bias can be compensated for by adjusting the length of the top list in a class-dependent fashion, so that the number of negatives within the top list will be equal to (or proportional with) the size of the positive class. Using this balanced protocol the problematic classes can be identified by their AUC values, or by a scatter diagram in which the AUC values are plotted against positive/negative ratio of the top list. The use of likelihood-ratio scoring (Kaján et al, <em>Bioinformatics,</em> <strong>22</strong>, 2865–2869, 2007) the bias caused by class imbalance can be further decreased.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods\",\"volume\":\"70 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1210-1214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jbbm.2007.06.003\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165022X07001418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165022X07001418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

鉴定难以从序列中预测的有问题的蛋白质类别(结构域类型,蛋白质家族)是基因组注释中的一个关键问题。ROC(接受者工作特征)分析通常用于评估蛋白质相似性,但是其结果-曲线下面积(AUC)值-对于大小差异很大的各种蛋白质类别存在差异偏差。我们展示了偏差可以通过以类依赖的方式调整top list的长度来补偿,这样top list中的negative的数量将等于(或与)positive class的大小成比例。使用这种平衡的协议,可以通过AUC值或散点图来识别有问题的类,其中AUC值与顶部列表的正/负比率相对应。使用似然比评分法(Kaján et al ., Bioinformatics, 22, 2865-2869, 2007)可以进一步降低类不平衡造成的偏倚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balanced ROC analysis (BAROC) protocol for the evaluation of protein similarities

Identification of problematic protein classes (domain types, protein families) that are difficult to predict from sequence is a key issue in genome annotation. ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis is routinely used for the evaluation of protein similarities, however its results – the area under curve (AUC) values – are differentially biased for the various protein classes that are highly different in size. We show the bias can be compensated for by adjusting the length of the top list in a class-dependent fashion, so that the number of negatives within the top list will be equal to (or proportional with) the size of the positive class. Using this balanced protocol the problematic classes can be identified by their AUC values, or by a scatter diagram in which the AUC values are plotted against positive/negative ratio of the top list. The use of likelihood-ratio scoring (Kaján et al, Bioinformatics, 22, 2865–2869, 2007) the bias caused by class imbalance can be further decreased.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信