生物标志物能识别中风风险增加的女性吗?妇女健康倡议激素试验。

Charles Kooperberg, Mary Cushman, Judith Hsia, Jennifer G Robinson, Aaron K Aragaki, John K Lynch, Alison E Baird, Karen C Johnson, Lewis H Kuller, Shirley A A Beresford, Beatriz Rodriguez
{"title":"生物标志物能识别中风风险增加的女性吗?妇女健康倡议激素试验。","authors":"Charles Kooperberg,&nbsp;Mary Cushman,&nbsp;Judith Hsia,&nbsp;Jennifer G Robinson,&nbsp;Aaron K Aragaki,&nbsp;John K Lynch,&nbsp;Alison E Baird,&nbsp;Karen C Johnson,&nbsp;Lewis H Kuller,&nbsp;Shirley A A Beresford,&nbsp;Beatriz Rodriguez","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Women's Health Initiative hormone trials identified a 44% increase in ischemic stroke risk with combination estrogen plus progestin and a 39% increase with estrogen alone. We undertook a case-control biomarker study to elucidate underlying mechanisms, and to potentially identify women who would be at lower or higher risk for stroke with postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The hormone trials were randomized, double-blind, and placebo controlled.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The Women's Health Initiative trials were conducted at 40 clinical centers in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The trials enrolled 27,347 postmenopausal women, aged 50-79 y.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>We randomized 16,608 women with intact uterus to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg with medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg daily or placebo, and 10,739 women with prior hysterectomy to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg daily or placebo.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Stroke was ascertained during 5.6 y of follow-up in the estrogen plus progestin trial and 6.8 y of follow-up in the estrogen alone trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No baseline clinical characteristics, including gene polymorphisms, identified women for whom the stroke risk from HT was higher. Paradoxically, women with higher baseline levels of some stroke-associated biomarkers had a lower risk of stroke when assigned to estrogen plus progestin compared to placebo. For example, those with higher IL-6 were not at increased stroke risk when assigned to estrogen plus progestin (odds ratio 1.28) but were when assigned to placebo (odds ratio 3.47; p for difference = 0.02). Similar findings occurred for high baseline PAP, leukocyte count, and D-dimer. However, only an interaction of D-dimer during follow-up interaction with HT and stroke was marginally significant (p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biomarkers did not identify women at higher stroke risk with postmenopausal HT. Some biomarkers appeared to identify women at lower stroke risk with estrogen plus progestin, but these findings may be due to chance.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020028","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can biomarkers identify women at increased stroke risk? The Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Charles Kooperberg,&nbsp;Mary Cushman,&nbsp;Judith Hsia,&nbsp;Jennifer G Robinson,&nbsp;Aaron K Aragaki,&nbsp;John K Lynch,&nbsp;Alison E Baird,&nbsp;Karen C Johnson,&nbsp;Lewis H Kuller,&nbsp;Shirley A A Beresford,&nbsp;Beatriz Rodriguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Women's Health Initiative hormone trials identified a 44% increase in ischemic stroke risk with combination estrogen plus progestin and a 39% increase with estrogen alone. We undertook a case-control biomarker study to elucidate underlying mechanisms, and to potentially identify women who would be at lower or higher risk for stroke with postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The hormone trials were randomized, double-blind, and placebo controlled.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The Women's Health Initiative trials were conducted at 40 clinical centers in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The trials enrolled 27,347 postmenopausal women, aged 50-79 y.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>We randomized 16,608 women with intact uterus to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg with medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg daily or placebo, and 10,739 women with prior hysterectomy to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg daily or placebo.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Stroke was ascertained during 5.6 y of follow-up in the estrogen plus progestin trial and 6.8 y of follow-up in the estrogen alone trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No baseline clinical characteristics, including gene polymorphisms, identified women for whom the stroke risk from HT was higher. Paradoxically, women with higher baseline levels of some stroke-associated biomarkers had a lower risk of stroke when assigned to estrogen plus progestin compared to placebo. For example, those with higher IL-6 were not at increased stroke risk when assigned to estrogen plus progestin (odds ratio 1.28) but were when assigned to placebo (odds ratio 3.47; p for difference = 0.02). Similar findings occurred for high baseline PAP, leukocyte count, and D-dimer. However, only an interaction of D-dimer during follow-up interaction with HT and stroke was marginally significant (p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biomarkers did not identify women at higher stroke risk with postmenopausal HT. Some biomarkers appeared to identify women at lower stroke risk with estrogen plus progestin, but these findings may be due to chance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS clinical trials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020028\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

目的:妇女健康倡议激素试验发现,雌激素加黄体酮联合使用缺血性卒中风险增加44%,单独使用雌激素增加39%。我们进行了一项病例对照生物标志物研究,以阐明潜在的机制,并潜在地确定绝经后激素治疗(HT)的女性卒中风险较低或较高。设计:激素试验随机、双盲、安慰剂对照。环境:妇女健康倡议试验在美国的40个临床中心进行。受试者:试验纳入了27,347名绝经后妇女,年龄在50-79岁之间。干预措施:我们将16,608名子宫完整的妇女随机分配到每天0.625毫克结合雌激素和醋酸甲孕酮2.5毫克或安慰剂组,10,739名子宫切除过的妇女随机分配到每天0.625毫克结合雌激素或安慰剂组。结果测量:在雌激素加黄体酮试验中,在随访5.6 y时确定卒中,在单独雌激素试验中随访6.8 y时确定卒中。结果:没有基线临床特征,包括基因多态性,确定HT卒中风险较高的女性。矛盾的是,与安慰剂相比,一些中风相关生物标志物基线水平较高的女性在接受雌激素加黄体酮治疗时中风的风险较低。例如,那些IL-6较高的患者在接受雌激素加黄体酮治疗(优势比1.28)时卒中风险没有增加,但在接受安慰剂治疗(优势比3.47;P为差异= 0.02)。基线PAP、白细胞计数和d -二聚体较高的患者也出现了类似的结果。然而,在随访中,只有d -二聚体与HT和卒中的相互作用具有边际显著性(p = 0.03)。结论:生物标志物不能识别绝经后HT患者卒中风险较高的女性。一些生物标志物似乎可以识别出服用雌激素和黄体酮的女性中风风险较低,但这些发现可能是偶然的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Can biomarkers identify women at increased stroke risk? The Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials.

Can biomarkers identify women at increased stroke risk? The Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials.

Can biomarkers identify women at increased stroke risk? The Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials.

Can biomarkers identify women at increased stroke risk? The Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials.

Objective: The Women's Health Initiative hormone trials identified a 44% increase in ischemic stroke risk with combination estrogen plus progestin and a 39% increase with estrogen alone. We undertook a case-control biomarker study to elucidate underlying mechanisms, and to potentially identify women who would be at lower or higher risk for stroke with postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT).

Design: The hormone trials were randomized, double-blind, and placebo controlled.

Setting: The Women's Health Initiative trials were conducted at 40 clinical centers in the United States.

Participants: The trials enrolled 27,347 postmenopausal women, aged 50-79 y.

Interventions: We randomized 16,608 women with intact uterus to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg with medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg daily or placebo, and 10,739 women with prior hysterectomy to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg daily or placebo.

Outcome measures: Stroke was ascertained during 5.6 y of follow-up in the estrogen plus progestin trial and 6.8 y of follow-up in the estrogen alone trial.

Results: No baseline clinical characteristics, including gene polymorphisms, identified women for whom the stroke risk from HT was higher. Paradoxically, women with higher baseline levels of some stroke-associated biomarkers had a lower risk of stroke when assigned to estrogen plus progestin compared to placebo. For example, those with higher IL-6 were not at increased stroke risk when assigned to estrogen plus progestin (odds ratio 1.28) but were when assigned to placebo (odds ratio 3.47; p for difference = 0.02). Similar findings occurred for high baseline PAP, leukocyte count, and D-dimer. However, only an interaction of D-dimer during follow-up interaction with HT and stroke was marginally significant (p = 0.03).

Conclusions: Biomarkers did not identify women at higher stroke risk with postmenopausal HT. Some biomarkers appeared to identify women at lower stroke risk with estrogen plus progestin, but these findings may be due to chance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信