坦桑尼亚艾滋病毒实验室检测的质量:情况分析。

G S Mfinanga, B Mutayoba, G Mbogo, A Kahwa, G Kimaro, P P Mhame, C Mwangi, M N Malecela, A Y Kitua
{"title":"坦桑尼亚艾滋病毒实验室检测的质量:情况分析。","authors":"G S Mfinanga,&nbsp;B Mutayoba,&nbsp;G Mbogo,&nbsp;A Kahwa,&nbsp;G Kimaro,&nbsp;P P Mhame,&nbsp;C Mwangi,&nbsp;M N Malecela,&nbsp;A Y Kitua","doi":"10.4314/thrb.v9i1.14291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tanzania is scaling up prevention, treatment, care and support of individuals affected with HIV. There is therefore a need for high quality and reliable HIV infection testing and AIDS staging. The objective of this study was to assess laboratories capacities of services in terms of HIV testing and quality control. A baseline survey was conducted from December 2004 to February 2005 in 12 laboratories which were conveniently selected to represent all the zones of Tanzania. The questionnaires comprised of questions on laboratory particulars, internal and external quality control for HIV testing and quality control of reagents. Source and level of customer satisfaction of HIV test kits supply was established. Of 12 laboratories, nine used rapid tests for screening and two used rapid tests for diagnosis. In the 12 laboratories, four used double ELISA and five used single ELISA and three did not use ELISA. Confirmatory tests observed were Western Blot in three laboratories, DNA PCR in two laboratories, CD4 counting in seven laboratories, and viral load in two laboratories. Although all laboratories conducted quality control (QC) of the HIV kits, only two laboratories had Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Internal and external quality control (EQC) was done at varied proportions with the highest frequency of 55.6% (5/9) for internal quality control (IQC) for rapid tests and EQC for ELISA, and the lowest frequency of 14.3% (1/ 7) for IQC for CD4 counting. None of the nine laboratories which conducted QC for reagents used for rapid tests and none of the five which performed IQC and EQC had SOPs. HIV kits were mainly procured by the Medical Store Department and most of laboratories were not satisfied with the delay in procurement procedures. Most of the laboratories used rapid tests only, while some used both rapid tests and ELISA method for HIV testing. In conclusion, the survey revealed inadequacy in Good Laboratory Practice and poor laboratory quality control process for HIV testing reagents, internal and external quality control.</p>","PeriodicalId":87458,"journal":{"name":"Tanzania health research bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/thrb.v9i1.14291","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of HIV laboratory testing in Tanzania: a situation analysis.\",\"authors\":\"G S Mfinanga,&nbsp;B Mutayoba,&nbsp;G Mbogo,&nbsp;A Kahwa,&nbsp;G Kimaro,&nbsp;P P Mhame,&nbsp;C Mwangi,&nbsp;M N Malecela,&nbsp;A Y Kitua\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/thrb.v9i1.14291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tanzania is scaling up prevention, treatment, care and support of individuals affected with HIV. There is therefore a need for high quality and reliable HIV infection testing and AIDS staging. The objective of this study was to assess laboratories capacities of services in terms of HIV testing and quality control. A baseline survey was conducted from December 2004 to February 2005 in 12 laboratories which were conveniently selected to represent all the zones of Tanzania. The questionnaires comprised of questions on laboratory particulars, internal and external quality control for HIV testing and quality control of reagents. Source and level of customer satisfaction of HIV test kits supply was established. Of 12 laboratories, nine used rapid tests for screening and two used rapid tests for diagnosis. In the 12 laboratories, four used double ELISA and five used single ELISA and three did not use ELISA. Confirmatory tests observed were Western Blot in three laboratories, DNA PCR in two laboratories, CD4 counting in seven laboratories, and viral load in two laboratories. Although all laboratories conducted quality control (QC) of the HIV kits, only two laboratories had Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Internal and external quality control (EQC) was done at varied proportions with the highest frequency of 55.6% (5/9) for internal quality control (IQC) for rapid tests and EQC for ELISA, and the lowest frequency of 14.3% (1/ 7) for IQC for CD4 counting. None of the nine laboratories which conducted QC for reagents used for rapid tests and none of the five which performed IQC and EQC had SOPs. HIV kits were mainly procured by the Medical Store Department and most of laboratories were not satisfied with the delay in procurement procedures. Most of the laboratories used rapid tests only, while some used both rapid tests and ELISA method for HIV testing. In conclusion, the survey revealed inadequacy in Good Laboratory Practice and poor laboratory quality control process for HIV testing reagents, internal and external quality control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tanzania health research bulletin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/thrb.v9i1.14291\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tanzania health research bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v9i1.14291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzania health research bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v9i1.14291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

坦桑尼亚正在加强对艾滋病毒感染者的预防、治疗、护理和支持。因此,需要进行高质量和可靠的艾滋病毒感染检测和艾滋病分期。这项研究的目的是评估实验室在艾滋病毒检测和质量控制方面的服务能力。2004年12月至2005年2月在12个实验室进行了基线调查,这些实验室被方便地选为坦桑尼亚所有地区的代表。问卷内容包括实验室资料、HIV检测的内部和外部质量控制以及试剂的质量控制。建立HIV检测试剂盒供应的客户满意度来源和水平。在12个实验室中,9个使用快速检测进行筛查,2个使用快速检测进行诊断。12个实验室中4个使用双酶联免疫吸附试验,5个使用单酶联免疫吸附试验,3个未使用酶联免疫吸附试验。观察到的确认试验是Western Blot(3个实验室)、DNA PCR(2个实验室)、CD4计数(7个实验室)和病毒载量(2个实验室)。虽然所有实验室都对艾滋病毒试剂盒进行质量控制,但只有两个实验室有标准操作程序。内外部质控(EQC)比例不同,快速检测和ELISA检测的内外部质控频率最高,为55.6% (5/9),CD4计数的内外部质控频率最低,为14.3%(1/ 7)。对用于快速检测的试剂进行质量控制的9个实验室和进行IQC和EQC的5个实验室都没有标准操作规程。艾滋病毒试剂盒主要由医药储藏部采购,大多数化验室对采购程序的延误不满意。大多数实验室仅使用快速检测,而有些实验室同时使用快速检测和酶联免疫吸附法进行艾滋病毒检测。调查结果表明,在HIV检测试剂、内外部质量控制方面,良好实验室操作规范存在不足,实验室质量控制流程不完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of HIV laboratory testing in Tanzania: a situation analysis.

Tanzania is scaling up prevention, treatment, care and support of individuals affected with HIV. There is therefore a need for high quality and reliable HIV infection testing and AIDS staging. The objective of this study was to assess laboratories capacities of services in terms of HIV testing and quality control. A baseline survey was conducted from December 2004 to February 2005 in 12 laboratories which were conveniently selected to represent all the zones of Tanzania. The questionnaires comprised of questions on laboratory particulars, internal and external quality control for HIV testing and quality control of reagents. Source and level of customer satisfaction of HIV test kits supply was established. Of 12 laboratories, nine used rapid tests for screening and two used rapid tests for diagnosis. In the 12 laboratories, four used double ELISA and five used single ELISA and three did not use ELISA. Confirmatory tests observed were Western Blot in three laboratories, DNA PCR in two laboratories, CD4 counting in seven laboratories, and viral load in two laboratories. Although all laboratories conducted quality control (QC) of the HIV kits, only two laboratories had Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Internal and external quality control (EQC) was done at varied proportions with the highest frequency of 55.6% (5/9) for internal quality control (IQC) for rapid tests and EQC for ELISA, and the lowest frequency of 14.3% (1/ 7) for IQC for CD4 counting. None of the nine laboratories which conducted QC for reagents used for rapid tests and none of the five which performed IQC and EQC had SOPs. HIV kits were mainly procured by the Medical Store Department and most of laboratories were not satisfied with the delay in procurement procedures. Most of the laboratories used rapid tests only, while some used both rapid tests and ELISA method for HIV testing. In conclusion, the survey revealed inadequacy in Good Laboratory Practice and poor laboratory quality control process for HIV testing reagents, internal and external quality control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信