加强国家在瀑布管理中循证政策和实践的能力:“翻译任务小组”的作用?

Roslyn G Poulos, Anthony B Zwi, Stephen R Lord
{"title":"加强国家在瀑布管理中循证政策和实践的能力:“翻译任务小组”的作用?","authors":"Roslyn G Poulos,&nbsp;Anthony B Zwi,&nbsp;Stephen R Lord","doi":"10.1186/1743-8462-4-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been a growing interest over recent years, both within Australia and overseas, in enhancing the translation of research into policy and practice. As one mechanism to improve the dissemination and uptake of falls research into policy and practice and to foster the development of policy-appropriate research, a \"Falls Translation Task Group\" was formed as part of an NHMRC Population Health Capacity Building grant. This paper reports on the group's first initiative to address issues around the research to policy and practice interface, and identifies a continuing role for such a group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A one day forum brought together falls researchers and decision-makers from across the nation to facilitate linkage and exchange. Observations of the day's proceedings were made by the authors. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire at the commencement of the forum (to ascertain expectations) and at its completion (to evaluate the event). Observer notes and the questionnaire responses form the basis of analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both researchers and decision-makers have a desire to bridge the gap between research and policy and practice. Significant barriers to research uptake were highlighted and included both \"health system barriers\" (for example, a lack of financial and human resources) as well as \"evidence barriers\" (such as insufficient economic data and implementation research). Solutions to some of these barriers included the identification of clinical champions within the health sector to enhance evidence uptake, and the sourcing of alternative funding to support implementation research and encourage partnerships between researchers, decision-makers and other stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants sought opportunities for ongoing networking and collaboration. Two activities have been identified as priorities: establishing a \"policy-sensitive\" research agenda and partnering researchers and decision-makers in the process; and establishing a National Translation Task Group with a broad membership.</p>","PeriodicalId":87170,"journal":{"name":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","volume":"4 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-4-6","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards enhancing national capacity for evidence informed policy and practice in falls management: a role for a \\\"Translation Task Group\\\"?\",\"authors\":\"Roslyn G Poulos,&nbsp;Anthony B Zwi,&nbsp;Stephen R Lord\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1743-8462-4-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been a growing interest over recent years, both within Australia and overseas, in enhancing the translation of research into policy and practice. As one mechanism to improve the dissemination and uptake of falls research into policy and practice and to foster the development of policy-appropriate research, a \\\"Falls Translation Task Group\\\" was formed as part of an NHMRC Population Health Capacity Building grant. This paper reports on the group's first initiative to address issues around the research to policy and practice interface, and identifies a continuing role for such a group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A one day forum brought together falls researchers and decision-makers from across the nation to facilitate linkage and exchange. Observations of the day's proceedings were made by the authors. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire at the commencement of the forum (to ascertain expectations) and at its completion (to evaluate the event). Observer notes and the questionnaire responses form the basis of analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both researchers and decision-makers have a desire to bridge the gap between research and policy and practice. Significant barriers to research uptake were highlighted and included both \\\"health system barriers\\\" (for example, a lack of financial and human resources) as well as \\\"evidence barriers\\\" (such as insufficient economic data and implementation research). Solutions to some of these barriers included the identification of clinical champions within the health sector to enhance evidence uptake, and the sourcing of alternative funding to support implementation research and encourage partnerships between researchers, decision-makers and other stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants sought opportunities for ongoing networking and collaboration. Two activities have been identified as priorities: establishing a \\\"policy-sensitive\\\" research agenda and partnering researchers and decision-makers in the process; and establishing a National Translation Task Group with a broad membership.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australia and New Zealand health policy\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-4-6\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australia and New Zealand health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-4-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-4-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

背景:近年来,在澳大利亚和海外,人们对加强将研究成果转化为政策和实践越来越感兴趣。作为一种机制,改善将瀑布研究传播和纳入政策和实践,并促进发展适合政策的研究,成立了一个“瀑布翻译任务小组”,作为国家卫生和资源管理委员会人口健康能力建设赠款的一部分。本文报告了该小组的第一个倡议,以解决围绕政策和实践界面的研究问题,并确定了这样一个小组的持续角色。方法:为期一天的论坛汇集了来自全国各地的跌倒研究人员和决策者,以促进联系和交流。撰文人对当天的程序作了评论。参与者被要求在论坛开始时(确定期望)和结束时(评估活动)完成一份调查问卷。观察员的说明和问卷的回答构成了分析的基础。结果:研究人员和决策者都希望弥合研究与政策和实践之间的差距。他们强调了研究吸收方面的重大障碍,包括“卫生系统障碍”(例如,缺乏财政和人力资源)以及“证据障碍”(例如,经济数据和实施研究不足)。其中一些障碍的解决办法包括确定卫生部门内的临床倡导者,以加强证据的吸收,以及寻找替代资金,以支持实施研究,并鼓励研究人员、决策者和其他利益攸关方之间建立伙伴关系。结论:参与者寻求持续的网络和合作机会。两项活动已被确定为优先事项:建立一个“对政策敏感”的研究议程,并在这一进程中使研究人员和决策者结成伙伴关系;并建立了一个拥有广泛成员的国家翻译工作组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Towards enhancing national capacity for evidence informed policy and practice in falls management: a role for a "Translation Task Group"?

Towards enhancing national capacity for evidence informed policy and practice in falls management: a role for a "Translation Task Group"?

Background: There has been a growing interest over recent years, both within Australia and overseas, in enhancing the translation of research into policy and practice. As one mechanism to improve the dissemination and uptake of falls research into policy and practice and to foster the development of policy-appropriate research, a "Falls Translation Task Group" was formed as part of an NHMRC Population Health Capacity Building grant. This paper reports on the group's first initiative to address issues around the research to policy and practice interface, and identifies a continuing role for such a group.

Methods: A one day forum brought together falls researchers and decision-makers from across the nation to facilitate linkage and exchange. Observations of the day's proceedings were made by the authors. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire at the commencement of the forum (to ascertain expectations) and at its completion (to evaluate the event). Observer notes and the questionnaire responses form the basis of analysis.

Results: Both researchers and decision-makers have a desire to bridge the gap between research and policy and practice. Significant barriers to research uptake were highlighted and included both "health system barriers" (for example, a lack of financial and human resources) as well as "evidence barriers" (such as insufficient economic data and implementation research). Solutions to some of these barriers included the identification of clinical champions within the health sector to enhance evidence uptake, and the sourcing of alternative funding to support implementation research and encourage partnerships between researchers, decision-makers and other stakeholders.

Conclusion: Participants sought opportunities for ongoing networking and collaboration. Two activities have been identified as priorities: establishing a "policy-sensitive" research agenda and partnering researchers and decision-makers in the process; and establishing a National Translation Task Group with a broad membership.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信