对在德国执业的脊医的调查:执业特点、专业阅读习惯和对研究的态度和看法。

Ilke Schwarz, Maria A Hondras
{"title":"对在德国执业的脊医的调查:执业特点、专业阅读习惯和对研究的态度和看法。","authors":"Ilke Schwarz,&nbsp;Maria A Hondras","doi":"10.1186/1746-1340-15-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2004, a survey conducted by the European Chiropractor's Union among member countries reported that \"there appears to be little interest in research among chiropractors in Germany.\" However, no research has tested this statement. The objective of this study was to explore the attitudes and perceptions of practicing chiropractors in Germany regarding research, to look at their reading and research habits, and to gather demographic and practice data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was developed and distributed among participants at a seminar held by the German Chiropractors' Association in 2005. The questionnaire was mailed to any members of the association who did not attend the seminar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 (72%) of 68 distributed questionnaires were returned. Forty-five (92%) respondents stated they would support research efforts in Germany and 15 (31%) declared interest in participating in practiced based research. An average of three hours per week were reportedly spent reading scientific literature by 44 (85%) respondents. However, few journals listed by respondents were peer-reviewed and indexed; most were newsletters of chiropractic organizations or free publications. Most participants agreed on the importance of research for the profession, but when asked about the most pressing issue for chiropractic in Germany, legislation and recognition of the profession were the dominant themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this survey show that there is a general interest in supporting and participating in research activities among chiropractors practicing in Germany. Next steps could consist of educating practitioners about the resources available to read and interpret the scientific literature and thus further the understanding of research.</p>","PeriodicalId":87173,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","volume":"15 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-15-6","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of chiropractors practicing in Germany: practice characteristics, professional reading habits, and attitudes and perceptions toward research.\",\"authors\":\"Ilke Schwarz,&nbsp;Maria A Hondras\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1746-1340-15-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2004, a survey conducted by the European Chiropractor's Union among member countries reported that \\\"there appears to be little interest in research among chiropractors in Germany.\\\" However, no research has tested this statement. The objective of this study was to explore the attitudes and perceptions of practicing chiropractors in Germany regarding research, to look at their reading and research habits, and to gather demographic and practice data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was developed and distributed among participants at a seminar held by the German Chiropractors' Association in 2005. The questionnaire was mailed to any members of the association who did not attend the seminar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 (72%) of 68 distributed questionnaires were returned. Forty-five (92%) respondents stated they would support research efforts in Germany and 15 (31%) declared interest in participating in practiced based research. An average of three hours per week were reportedly spent reading scientific literature by 44 (85%) respondents. However, few journals listed by respondents were peer-reviewed and indexed; most were newsletters of chiropractic organizations or free publications. Most participants agreed on the importance of research for the profession, but when asked about the most pressing issue for chiropractic in Germany, legislation and recognition of the profession were the dominant themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this survey show that there is a general interest in supporting and participating in research activities among chiropractors practicing in Germany. Next steps could consist of educating practitioners about the resources available to read and interpret the scientific literature and thus further the understanding of research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chiropractic & osteopathy\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-15-6\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chiropractic & osteopathy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-15-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-15-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

背景:2004年,欧洲脊医联盟在成员国中进行的一项调查显示,“德国的脊医似乎对研究兴趣不大。”然而,没有研究证实这一说法。本研究的目的是探讨德国执业脊医对研究的态度和看法,观察他们的阅读和研究习惯,并收集人口统计和实践数据。方法:在2005年德国脊医协会举办的一次研讨会上,对与会者进行问卷调查。问卷被邮寄给任何没有参加研讨会的协会成员。结果:发放问卷68份,共回收49份(72%)。45名(92%)受访者表示他们将支持德国的研究工作,15名(31%)受访者表示有兴趣参与基于实践的研究。据报道,44名(85%)受访者每周平均花3小时阅读科学文献。然而,受访者列出的期刊很少经过同行评审和索引;大多数是脊医组织的通讯或免费出版物。大多数参与者都同意研究对该专业的重要性,但当被问及德国脊椎指压治疗最紧迫的问题是什么时,立法和对该专业的认可是主要主题。结论:本调查结果显示,在德国执业的脊医普遍对支持和参与研究活动感兴趣。接下来的步骤可能包括教育实践者关于阅读和解释科学文献的可用资源,从而进一步理解研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey of chiropractors practicing in Germany: practice characteristics, professional reading habits, and attitudes and perceptions toward research.

Background: In 2004, a survey conducted by the European Chiropractor's Union among member countries reported that "there appears to be little interest in research among chiropractors in Germany." However, no research has tested this statement. The objective of this study was to explore the attitudes and perceptions of practicing chiropractors in Germany regarding research, to look at their reading and research habits, and to gather demographic and practice data.

Methods: A questionnaire was developed and distributed among participants at a seminar held by the German Chiropractors' Association in 2005. The questionnaire was mailed to any members of the association who did not attend the seminar.

Results: A total of 49 (72%) of 68 distributed questionnaires were returned. Forty-five (92%) respondents stated they would support research efforts in Germany and 15 (31%) declared interest in participating in practiced based research. An average of three hours per week were reportedly spent reading scientific literature by 44 (85%) respondents. However, few journals listed by respondents were peer-reviewed and indexed; most were newsletters of chiropractic organizations or free publications. Most participants agreed on the importance of research for the profession, but when asked about the most pressing issue for chiropractic in Germany, legislation and recognition of the profession were the dominant themes.

Conclusion: The results of this survey show that there is a general interest in supporting and participating in research activities among chiropractors practicing in Germany. Next steps could consist of educating practitioners about the resources available to read and interpret the scientific literature and thus further the understanding of research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信