用界面装置模拟气溶胶沉积。

W H Finlay, A R Martin
{"title":"用界面装置模拟气溶胶沉积。","authors":"W H Finlay,&nbsp;A R Martin","doi":"10.1089/jam.2007.0554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various approaches can be used to mathematically model the performance of different masks, mouthpieces, and aerosol delivery devices. The sophistication of such models can vary widely, from the use of simple algebraic empirical correlations to advanced computational fluid dynamics simulations. Bench-top testing is also often used to model aspects of devices, since it is difficult to capture certain aspects of device behavior with mathematical models. These various approaches to modeling differ in their limitations. Empirical correlations exist for predicting the effects of varying mouthpiece diameter and mouth-throat dimensions on extrathoracic losses, but are restricted to stable, nonballistic aerosols in certain flow rate ranges. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations that solve the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations typically require near-wall turbulence corrections in order to adequately model mouth-throat deposition, while Large Eddy Simulation (LES) removes this deficiency. Bench-top models that use replicas of the extrathoracic airways vary in their accuracy and generality in replicating the filtering properties of these airways. Choosing and using these various modeling approaches for evaluating patient-device interfaces requires knowledge of their merits and pitfalls, a brief discussion of which is given here.</p>","PeriodicalId":14878,"journal":{"name":"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine","volume":"20 Suppl 1 ","pages":"S19-26; discussion S27-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/jam.2007.0554","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling of aerosol deposition with interface devices.\",\"authors\":\"W H Finlay,&nbsp;A R Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jam.2007.0554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Various approaches can be used to mathematically model the performance of different masks, mouthpieces, and aerosol delivery devices. The sophistication of such models can vary widely, from the use of simple algebraic empirical correlations to advanced computational fluid dynamics simulations. Bench-top testing is also often used to model aspects of devices, since it is difficult to capture certain aspects of device behavior with mathematical models. These various approaches to modeling differ in their limitations. Empirical correlations exist for predicting the effects of varying mouthpiece diameter and mouth-throat dimensions on extrathoracic losses, but are restricted to stable, nonballistic aerosols in certain flow rate ranges. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations that solve the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations typically require near-wall turbulence corrections in order to adequately model mouth-throat deposition, while Large Eddy Simulation (LES) removes this deficiency. Bench-top models that use replicas of the extrathoracic airways vary in their accuracy and generality in replicating the filtering properties of these airways. Choosing and using these various modeling approaches for evaluating patient-device interfaces requires knowledge of their merits and pitfalls, a brief discussion of which is given here.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 Suppl 1 \",\"pages\":\"S19-26; discussion S27-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/jam.2007.0554\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jam.2007.0554\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jam.2007.0554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

可以使用各种方法对不同口罩、吹嘴和气溶胶输送装置的性能进行数学建模。这些模型的复杂程度可以有很大的不同,从使用简单的代数经验关联到先进的计算流体动力学模拟。台式测试也经常用于对设备的各个方面进行建模,因为用数学模型很难捕捉设备行为的某些方面。这些不同的建模方法在局限性方面各不相同。在预测不同的吸口直径和口喉尺寸对胸外损失的影响时,存在经验相关性,但仅限于在一定流速范围内稳定的非弹道气溶胶。求解reynolds -平均Navier-Stokes (RANS)方程的计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟通常需要近壁湍流修正,以便充分模拟口-喉沉积,而大涡模拟(LES)消除了这一缺陷。使用胸外气道复制品的台式模型在复制这些气道过滤特性方面的准确性和通用性各不相同。选择和使用这些不同的建模方法来评估患者-设备接口需要了解它们的优点和缺陷,这里给出了简要的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling of aerosol deposition with interface devices.

Various approaches can be used to mathematically model the performance of different masks, mouthpieces, and aerosol delivery devices. The sophistication of such models can vary widely, from the use of simple algebraic empirical correlations to advanced computational fluid dynamics simulations. Bench-top testing is also often used to model aspects of devices, since it is difficult to capture certain aspects of device behavior with mathematical models. These various approaches to modeling differ in their limitations. Empirical correlations exist for predicting the effects of varying mouthpiece diameter and mouth-throat dimensions on extrathoracic losses, but are restricted to stable, nonballistic aerosols in certain flow rate ranges. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations that solve the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations typically require near-wall turbulence corrections in order to adequately model mouth-throat deposition, while Large Eddy Simulation (LES) removes this deficiency. Bench-top models that use replicas of the extrathoracic airways vary in their accuracy and generality in replicating the filtering properties of these airways. Choosing and using these various modeling approaches for evaluating patient-device interfaces requires knowledge of their merits and pitfalls, a brief discussion of which is given here.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信