轻微交通伤害后的恢复:一项随机对照试验。

Carin Ottosson, Hans Pettersson, Sven-Erik Johansson, Olof Nyrén, Sari Ponzer
{"title":"轻微交通伤害后的恢复:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Carin Ottosson,&nbsp;Hans Pettersson,&nbsp;Sven-Erik Johansson,&nbsp;Olof Nyrén,&nbsp;Sari Ponzer","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the efficacy of an acute multidisciplinary group intervention on self-perceived recovery following minor traffic-related musculoskeletal injuries.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Open, randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A large inner-city hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>127 patients (> or = 15 y) with traffic-related acute minor musculoskeletal injuries and predicted to be at risk for delayed recovery were randomized into an intervention group (n = 65) or a control group (n = 62).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Four 1 1/2-h sessions in open groups with the aim of providing information about injuries in general, calling attention to the importance of self-care and promoting physical activity. In addition, both groups received standard medical care by regular staff.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The main outcome measure was self-reported recovery at 12 mo. Secondary outcome measures were ratings of functional health status (SF-36, SMFA), pain and mental distress on visual analog scales, and self-reported duration of sick leave.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 mo, there was a 21.9 percentage point difference: 52.4% of the patients in the intervention group and 30.5% in the control group reported self-perceived recovery (95% confidence interval for the difference 5%-38%; p = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the secondary outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A simple group intervention may accelerate the self-perceived recovery in selected patients. As we did not find evidence of improvements in the secondary outcome measures, the clinical significance of the treatment benefit remains to be defined.</p>","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020014","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovery after minor traffic injuries: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Carin Ottosson,&nbsp;Hans Pettersson,&nbsp;Sven-Erik Johansson,&nbsp;Olof Nyrén,&nbsp;Sari Ponzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pctr.0020014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the efficacy of an acute multidisciplinary group intervention on self-perceived recovery following minor traffic-related musculoskeletal injuries.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Open, randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A large inner-city hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>127 patients (> or = 15 y) with traffic-related acute minor musculoskeletal injuries and predicted to be at risk for delayed recovery were randomized into an intervention group (n = 65) or a control group (n = 62).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Four 1 1/2-h sessions in open groups with the aim of providing information about injuries in general, calling attention to the importance of self-care and promoting physical activity. In addition, both groups received standard medical care by regular staff.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The main outcome measure was self-reported recovery at 12 mo. Secondary outcome measures were ratings of functional health status (SF-36, SMFA), pain and mental distress on visual analog scales, and self-reported duration of sick leave.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 mo, there was a 21.9 percentage point difference: 52.4% of the patients in the intervention group and 30.5% in the control group reported self-perceived recovery (95% confidence interval for the difference 5%-38%; p = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the secondary outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A simple group intervention may accelerate the self-perceived recovery in selected patients. As we did not find evidence of improvements in the secondary outcome measures, the clinical significance of the treatment benefit remains to be defined.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS clinical trials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020014\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:评估急性多学科小组干预对轻微交通相关肌肉骨骼损伤后自我感觉恢复的疗效。设计:开放、随机对照试验。背景:市中心的一家大型医院。参与者:127名患有交通相关急性轻微肌肉骨骼损伤并预测有延迟恢复风险的患者(>15岁)被随机分为干预组(n=65)或对照组(n=62),提醒人们注意自我保健和促进体育活动的重要性。此外,这两个群体都得到了正规工作人员的标准医疗服务。结果测量:主要结果测量是12个月时自我报告的康复情况。次要结果测量是功能健康状况(SF-36,SMFA)、视觉模拟量表上的疼痛和精神痛苦评分,以及自我报告的病假时间。结果:在12个月时,有21.9个百分点的差异:干预组52.4%的患者和对照组30.5%的患者报告了自我感觉的恢复(差异的95%置信区间为5%-38%;p=0.03)。两组在次要结果测量方面没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:简单的团体干预可以加速选定患者的自我感觉恢复。由于我们没有发现次要疗效指标改善的证据,治疗效果的临床意义仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Recovery after minor traffic injuries: a randomized controlled trial.

Recovery after minor traffic injuries: a randomized controlled trial.

Recovery after minor traffic injuries: a randomized controlled trial.

Recovery after minor traffic injuries: a randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of an acute multidisciplinary group intervention on self-perceived recovery following minor traffic-related musculoskeletal injuries.

Design: Open, randomized controlled trial.

Setting: A large inner-city hospital.

Participants: 127 patients (> or = 15 y) with traffic-related acute minor musculoskeletal injuries and predicted to be at risk for delayed recovery were randomized into an intervention group (n = 65) or a control group (n = 62).

Intervention: Four 1 1/2-h sessions in open groups with the aim of providing information about injuries in general, calling attention to the importance of self-care and promoting physical activity. In addition, both groups received standard medical care by regular staff.

Outcome measures: The main outcome measure was self-reported recovery at 12 mo. Secondary outcome measures were ratings of functional health status (SF-36, SMFA), pain and mental distress on visual analog scales, and self-reported duration of sick leave.

Results: At 12 mo, there was a 21.9 percentage point difference: 52.4% of the patients in the intervention group and 30.5% in the control group reported self-perceived recovery (95% confidence interval for the difference 5%-38%; p = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the secondary outcome measures.

Conclusion: A simple group intervention may accelerate the self-perceived recovery in selected patients. As we did not find evidence of improvements in the secondary outcome measures, the clinical significance of the treatment benefit remains to be defined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信