美国国立卫生研究院关于多种维生素/矿物质补充剂和慢性疾病预防的科学会议声明。

{"title":"美国国立卫生研究院关于多种维生素/矿物质补充剂和慢性疾病预防的科学会议声明。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data on Multivitamin/Mineral Supplements and Chronic Disease Prevention.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A non-DHHS, non-advocate 13-member panel included experts in the fields of food science and human nutrition, biostatistics, biochemistry, toxicology, geriatric medicine, family medicine, pediatrics and pediatric endocrinology, cancer prevention, epidemiology, disease prevention and health promotion, and consumer protection. In addition, 19 experts from pertinent fields presented data to the panel and conference audience.</p><p><strong>Evidence: </strong>Presentations by experts and a systematic review of the literature prepared by The Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center, through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Scientific evidence was given precedence over anecdotal experience.</p><p><strong>Conference process: </strong>The panel drafted its statement based on scientific evidence presented in open forum and on published scientific literature. The draft statement was presented on the final day of the conference and circulated to the audience for comment. The panel released a revised statement later that day at http://consensus.nih.gov. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of multivitamins/minerals (MVMs) has grown rapidly over the past several decades, and dietary supplements are now used by more than half of the adult population in the United States. In general, MVMs are used by individuals who practice healthier lifestyles, thus making observational studies of the overall relationship between MVM use and general health outcomes difficult to interpret. Despite the widespread use of MVMs, we still have insufficient knowledge about the actual amount of total nutrients that Americans consume from diet and supplements. This is at least in part due to the fortification of foods with these nutrients, which adds to the effects of MVMs or single-vitamin or single-mineral supplements. Historically, fortification of foods has led to the remediation of vitamin and mineral deficits, but the cumulative effects of supplementation and fortification have also raised safety concerns about exceeding upper levels. Thus, there is a national need to improve the methods of obtaining accurate and current data on the public's total intake of these nutrients in foods and dietary supplements. In systematically evaluating the effectiveness and safety of MVMs in relation to chronic disease prevention, we found few rigorous studies on which to base clear conclusions and recommendations. Most of the studies we examined do not provide strong evidence for beneficial health-related effects of supplements taken singly, in pairs, or in combinations of three or more. Within some studies or subgroups of the study populations, there is encouraging evidence of health benefits, such as increased bone mineral density and decreased fractures in postmenopausal women who use calcium and vitamin D supplements. However, several other studies also provide disturbing evidence of risk, such as increased lung cancer risk with beta-carotene use among smokers. The current level of public assurance of the safety and quality of MVMs is inadequate, given the fact that manufacturers of these products are not required to report adverse events and the FDA has no regulatory authority to require labeling changes or to help inform the public of these issues and concerns. It is important that the FDA's purview over these products be authorized and implemented. Finally, the present evidence is insufficient to recommend either for or against the use of MVMs by the American public to prevent chronic disease. The resolution of this important issue will require advances in research and improved communication and collaboration among scientists, health care providers, patients, the pharmaceutical and supplement industries, and the public.</p>","PeriodicalId":86986,"journal":{"name":"NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements","volume":"23 2","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on Multivitamin/Mineral Supplements and Chronic Disease Prevention.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data on Multivitamin/Mineral Supplements and Chronic Disease Prevention.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A non-DHHS, non-advocate 13-member panel included experts in the fields of food science and human nutrition, biostatistics, biochemistry, toxicology, geriatric medicine, family medicine, pediatrics and pediatric endocrinology, cancer prevention, epidemiology, disease prevention and health promotion, and consumer protection. In addition, 19 experts from pertinent fields presented data to the panel and conference audience.</p><p><strong>Evidence: </strong>Presentations by experts and a systematic review of the literature prepared by The Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center, through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Scientific evidence was given precedence over anecdotal experience.</p><p><strong>Conference process: </strong>The panel drafted its statement based on scientific evidence presented in open forum and on published scientific literature. The draft statement was presented on the final day of the conference and circulated to the audience for comment. The panel released a revised statement later that day at http://consensus.nih.gov. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of multivitamins/minerals (MVMs) has grown rapidly over the past several decades, and dietary supplements are now used by more than half of the adult population in the United States. In general, MVMs are used by individuals who practice healthier lifestyles, thus making observational studies of the overall relationship between MVM use and general health outcomes difficult to interpret. Despite the widespread use of MVMs, we still have insufficient knowledge about the actual amount of total nutrients that Americans consume from diet and supplements. This is at least in part due to the fortification of foods with these nutrients, which adds to the effects of MVMs or single-vitamin or single-mineral supplements. Historically, fortification of foods has led to the remediation of vitamin and mineral deficits, but the cumulative effects of supplementation and fortification have also raised safety concerns about exceeding upper levels. Thus, there is a national need to improve the methods of obtaining accurate and current data on the public's total intake of these nutrients in foods and dietary supplements. In systematically evaluating the effectiveness and safety of MVMs in relation to chronic disease prevention, we found few rigorous studies on which to base clear conclusions and recommendations. Most of the studies we examined do not provide strong evidence for beneficial health-related effects of supplements taken singly, in pairs, or in combinations of three or more. Within some studies or subgroups of the study populations, there is encouraging evidence of health benefits, such as increased bone mineral density and decreased fractures in postmenopausal women who use calcium and vitamin D supplements. However, several other studies also provide disturbing evidence of risk, such as increased lung cancer risk with beta-carotene use among smokers. The current level of public assurance of the safety and quality of MVMs is inadequate, given the fact that manufacturers of these products are not required to report adverse events and the FDA has no regulatory authority to require labeling changes or to help inform the public of these issues and concerns. It is important that the FDA's purview over these products be authorized and implemented. Finally, the present evidence is insufficient to recommend either for or against the use of MVMs by the American public to prevent chronic disease. The resolution of this important issue will require advances in research and improved communication and collaboration among scientists, health care providers, patients, the pharmaceutical and supplement industries, and the public.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":86986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为卫生保健提供者、患者和公众提供对多种维生素/矿物质补充剂和慢性疾病预防的现有数据的负责任的评估。参与者:一个非dhhs、非倡导者的13人小组,包括食品科学和人类营养、生物统计学、生物化学、毒理学、老年医学、家庭医学、儿科和儿科内分泌学、癌症预防、流行病学、疾病预防和健康促进以及消费者保护等领域的专家。此外,来自相关领域的19位专家向小组和会议听众介绍了数据。证据:专家介绍和约翰霍普金斯大学循证实践中心通过医疗保健研究和质量机构编写的文献系统综述。科学证据优先于轶事经验。会议进程:小组根据公开论坛上提出的科学证据和已发表的科学文献起草了声明。声明草案在会议的最后一天提出,并分发给与会者征求意见。该委员会当天晚些时候在http://consensus.nih.gov上发布了一份修订后的声明。本声明是专家组的独立报告,不是NIH或联邦政府的政策声明。结论:在过去的几十年里,复合维生素/矿物质(MVMs)的使用迅速增长,现在美国一半以上的成年人都在使用膳食补充剂。一般来说,使用MVM的个人生活方式更健康,因此很难解释MVM使用与一般健康结果之间总体关系的观察性研究。尽管MVMs被广泛使用,但我们对美国人从饮食和补充剂中摄入的营养物质的实际总量仍然知之甚少。这至少部分是由于食物中添加了这些营养素,这增加了MVMs或单一维生素或单一矿物质补充剂的效果。从历史上看,强化食品导致了维生素和矿物质缺乏的补救,但补充和强化的累积效应也引起了对超标的安全担忧。因此,全国需要改进方法,以获得有关公众从食品和膳食补充剂中摄入这些营养素总量的准确和最新数据。在系统评估MVMs与慢性疾病预防相关的有效性和安全性时,我们发现很少有严谨的研究可以基于明确的结论和建议。我们检查的大多数研究都没有提供强有力的证据证明单独服用、成对服用、三种或三种以上的补充剂对健康有益。在一些研究或研究人群的亚组中,有令人鼓舞的证据表明,服用钙和维生素D补充剂对健康有益,例如绝经后妇女服用钙和维生素D补充剂可增加骨密度,减少骨折。然而,其他几项研究也提供了令人不安的风险证据,例如吸烟者使用-胡萝卜素会增加患肺癌的风险。鉴于这些产品的制造商不需要报告不良事件,FDA也没有监管权力要求更改标签或帮助告知公众这些问题和关注,目前公众对MVMs安全性和质量的保证水平是不足的。FDA对这些产品的权限得到授权和实施是很重要的。最后,目前的证据不足以支持或反对美国公众使用MVMs来预防慢性疾病。这一重要问题的解决需要研究的进步,以及科学家、卫生保健提供者、患者、制药和补充剂行业以及公众之间更好的沟通和合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on Multivitamin/Mineral Supplements and Chronic Disease Prevention.

Objective: To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data on Multivitamin/Mineral Supplements and Chronic Disease Prevention.

Participants: A non-DHHS, non-advocate 13-member panel included experts in the fields of food science and human nutrition, biostatistics, biochemistry, toxicology, geriatric medicine, family medicine, pediatrics and pediatric endocrinology, cancer prevention, epidemiology, disease prevention and health promotion, and consumer protection. In addition, 19 experts from pertinent fields presented data to the panel and conference audience.

Evidence: Presentations by experts and a systematic review of the literature prepared by The Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center, through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Scientific evidence was given precedence over anecdotal experience.

Conference process: The panel drafted its statement based on scientific evidence presented in open forum and on published scientific literature. The draft statement was presented on the final day of the conference and circulated to the audience for comment. The panel released a revised statement later that day at http://consensus.nih.gov. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.

Conclusions: Use of multivitamins/minerals (MVMs) has grown rapidly over the past several decades, and dietary supplements are now used by more than half of the adult population in the United States. In general, MVMs are used by individuals who practice healthier lifestyles, thus making observational studies of the overall relationship between MVM use and general health outcomes difficult to interpret. Despite the widespread use of MVMs, we still have insufficient knowledge about the actual amount of total nutrients that Americans consume from diet and supplements. This is at least in part due to the fortification of foods with these nutrients, which adds to the effects of MVMs or single-vitamin or single-mineral supplements. Historically, fortification of foods has led to the remediation of vitamin and mineral deficits, but the cumulative effects of supplementation and fortification have also raised safety concerns about exceeding upper levels. Thus, there is a national need to improve the methods of obtaining accurate and current data on the public's total intake of these nutrients in foods and dietary supplements. In systematically evaluating the effectiveness and safety of MVMs in relation to chronic disease prevention, we found few rigorous studies on which to base clear conclusions and recommendations. Most of the studies we examined do not provide strong evidence for beneficial health-related effects of supplements taken singly, in pairs, or in combinations of three or more. Within some studies or subgroups of the study populations, there is encouraging evidence of health benefits, such as increased bone mineral density and decreased fractures in postmenopausal women who use calcium and vitamin D supplements. However, several other studies also provide disturbing evidence of risk, such as increased lung cancer risk with beta-carotene use among smokers. The current level of public assurance of the safety and quality of MVMs is inadequate, given the fact that manufacturers of these products are not required to report adverse events and the FDA has no regulatory authority to require labeling changes or to help inform the public of these issues and concerns. It is important that the FDA's purview over these products be authorized and implemented. Finally, the present evidence is insufficient to recommend either for or against the use of MVMs by the American public to prevent chronic disease. The resolution of this important issue will require advances in research and improved communication and collaboration among scientists, health care providers, patients, the pharmaceutical and supplement industries, and the public.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信