淀粉样原纤维的结构模型。

Rebecca Nelson, David Eisenberg
{"title":"淀粉样原纤维的结构模型。","authors":"Rebecca Nelson,&nbsp;David Eisenberg","doi":"10.1016/S0065-3233(06)73008-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amyloid fibrils are elongated, insoluble protein aggregates deposited in vivo in amyloid diseases, and amyloid-like fibrils are formed in vitro from soluble proteins. Both of these groups of fibrils, despite differences in the sequence and native structure of their component proteins, share common properties, including their core structure. Multiple models have been proposed for the common core structure, but in most cases, atomic-level structural details have yet to be determined. Here we review several structural models proposed for amyloid and amyloid-like fibrils and relate features of these models to the common fibril properties. We divide models into three classes: Refolding, Gain-of-Interaction, and Natively Disordered. The Refolding models propose structurally distinct native and fibrillar states and suggest that backbone interactions drive fibril formation. In contrast, the Gain-of-Interaction models propose a largely native-like structure for the protein in the fibril and highlight the importance of specific sequences in fibril formation. The Natively Disordered models have aspects in common with both Refolding and Gain-of-Interaction models. While each class of model suggests explanations for some of the common fibril properties, and some models, such as Gain-of-Interaction models with a cross-beta spine, fit a wider range of properties than others, no one class provides a complete explanation for all amyloid fibril behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":51216,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Protein Chemistry","volume":"73 ","pages":"235-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0065-3233(06)73008-X","citationCount":"192","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural models of amyloid-like fibrils.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Nelson,&nbsp;David Eisenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0065-3233(06)73008-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Amyloid fibrils are elongated, insoluble protein aggregates deposited in vivo in amyloid diseases, and amyloid-like fibrils are formed in vitro from soluble proteins. Both of these groups of fibrils, despite differences in the sequence and native structure of their component proteins, share common properties, including their core structure. Multiple models have been proposed for the common core structure, but in most cases, atomic-level structural details have yet to be determined. Here we review several structural models proposed for amyloid and amyloid-like fibrils and relate features of these models to the common fibril properties. We divide models into three classes: Refolding, Gain-of-Interaction, and Natively Disordered. The Refolding models propose structurally distinct native and fibrillar states and suggest that backbone interactions drive fibril formation. In contrast, the Gain-of-Interaction models propose a largely native-like structure for the protein in the fibril and highlight the importance of specific sequences in fibril formation. The Natively Disordered models have aspects in common with both Refolding and Gain-of-Interaction models. While each class of model suggests explanations for some of the common fibril properties, and some models, such as Gain-of-Interaction models with a cross-beta spine, fit a wider range of properties than others, no one class provides a complete explanation for all amyloid fibril behavior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Protein Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"235-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0065-3233(06)73008-X\",\"citationCount\":\"192\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Protein Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3233(06)73008-X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Protein Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3233(06)73008-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 192

摘要

淀粉样蛋白原纤维被拉长,不溶性蛋白聚集在体内沉积在淀粉样蛋白疾病中,而淀粉样蛋白原纤维是在体外由可溶性蛋白形成的。这两组原纤维,尽管其组成蛋白的序列和天然结构不同,但具有共同的特性,包括其核心结构。对于共同核心结构,已经提出了多种模型,但在大多数情况下,原子级别的结构细节尚未确定。在这里,我们回顾了几种提出的淀粉样蛋白和淀粉样蛋白原纤维的结构模型,并将这些模型的特征与原纤维的共同特性联系起来。我们将模型分为三类:Refolding, Gain-of-Interaction和native disorder。Refolding模型提出了结构上不同的原生状态和原纤维状态,并表明主干相互作用驱动原纤维形成。相比之下,相互作用获得模型提出了原纤维中蛋白质的基本天然结构,并强调了特定序列在原纤维形成中的重要性。原生无序模型与Refolding和Gain-of-Interaction模型有一些共同之处。虽然每一类模型都能解释一些常见的淀粉样纤维特性,而且有些模型,如交叉β棘的相互作用增益模型,比其他模型更适合于更广泛的特性,但没有一种模型能对所有淀粉样纤维行为提供完整的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structural models of amyloid-like fibrils.

Amyloid fibrils are elongated, insoluble protein aggregates deposited in vivo in amyloid diseases, and amyloid-like fibrils are formed in vitro from soluble proteins. Both of these groups of fibrils, despite differences in the sequence and native structure of their component proteins, share common properties, including their core structure. Multiple models have been proposed for the common core structure, but in most cases, atomic-level structural details have yet to be determined. Here we review several structural models proposed for amyloid and amyloid-like fibrils and relate features of these models to the common fibril properties. We divide models into three classes: Refolding, Gain-of-Interaction, and Natively Disordered. The Refolding models propose structurally distinct native and fibrillar states and suggest that backbone interactions drive fibril formation. In contrast, the Gain-of-Interaction models propose a largely native-like structure for the protein in the fibril and highlight the importance of specific sequences in fibril formation. The Natively Disordered models have aspects in common with both Refolding and Gain-of-Interaction models. While each class of model suggests explanations for some of the common fibril properties, and some models, such as Gain-of-Interaction models with a cross-beta spine, fit a wider range of properties than others, no one class provides a complete explanation for all amyloid fibril behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信