[理性之心或声音:“安乐死”受害者家属与机构的通信]。

Petra Lutz
{"title":"[理性之心或声音:“安乐死”受害者家属与机构的通信]。","authors":"Petra Lutz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Between 1940 and 1945, some 250.000 institutionalized patients were murdered in Germany. This aspect of Nazi extermination policy involved a specific segment of the population in a special way: the victims' families. Only to a limited extent can their reactions can be historically analyzed in regard to the political question of assent, acquiescence, or resistance: although the families of institutional patients acted in a highly politicized context, this does not necessarily imply that they acted out of political motives. Family members' positions were mostly determined by their personal relationship to the patient and the situations in their own lives. The most important available source--the correspondence between family members and institutions--shows that situations in the family members' everyday lives were a crucial factor in actions that were potentially decisive for the life or death of a patient. Moral stances or critical estimations of Nazi mental health policy are rare, and still more rarely determined a course of action. Following this assessment, the article analyzes exemplary cases to offer a look at the range of family members' reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":81975,"journal":{"name":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","volume":"26 ","pages":"143-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The heart or the voice of reason: families of \\\"euthanasia\\\" victims in correspondence with institutions].\",\"authors\":\"Petra Lutz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Between 1940 and 1945, some 250.000 institutionalized patients were murdered in Germany. This aspect of Nazi extermination policy involved a specific segment of the population in a special way: the victims' families. Only to a limited extent can their reactions can be historically analyzed in regard to the political question of assent, acquiescence, or resistance: although the families of institutional patients acted in a highly politicized context, this does not necessarily imply that they acted out of political motives. Family members' positions were mostly determined by their personal relationship to the patient and the situations in their own lives. The most important available source--the correspondence between family members and institutions--shows that situations in the family members' everyday lives were a crucial factor in actions that were potentially decisive for the life or death of a patient. Moral stances or critical estimations of Nazi mental health policy are rare, and still more rarely determined a course of action. Following this assessment, the article analyzes exemplary cases to offer a look at the range of family members' reactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"143-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1940年至1945年间,德国约有25万住院病人被谋杀。纳粹灭绝政策的这一方面以一种特殊的方式涉及到人口的一个特定部分:受害者的家属。只有在有限的程度上,他们的反应才能在同意、默许或抵制的政治问题上进行历史分析:尽管机构患者的家庭在高度政治化的背景下行事,但这并不一定意味着他们的行为出于政治动机。家庭成员的立场主要取决于他们与患者的个人关系以及他们自己生活中的情况。最重要的现有资料来源————家庭成员与机构之间的通信————表明,家庭成员日常生活中的情况是可能决定病人生死的行动的关键因素。道德立场或对纳粹精神健康政策的批判性评价很少,更很少能决定一个行动方针。在此评估之后,本文分析了典型案例,以了解家庭成员的反应范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The heart or the voice of reason: families of "euthanasia" victims in correspondence with institutions].

Between 1940 and 1945, some 250.000 institutionalized patients were murdered in Germany. This aspect of Nazi extermination policy involved a specific segment of the population in a special way: the victims' families. Only to a limited extent can their reactions can be historically analyzed in regard to the political question of assent, acquiescence, or resistance: although the families of institutional patients acted in a highly politicized context, this does not necessarily imply that they acted out of political motives. Family members' positions were mostly determined by their personal relationship to the patient and the situations in their own lives. The most important available source--the correspondence between family members and institutions--shows that situations in the family members' everyday lives were a crucial factor in actions that were potentially decisive for the life or death of a patient. Moral stances or critical estimations of Nazi mental health policy are rare, and still more rarely determined a course of action. Following this assessment, the article analyzes exemplary cases to offer a look at the range of family members' reactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信