{"title":"发展中国家对婴儿听力损失的医师教育。","authors":"Bolajoko O Olusanya, Alero A Roberts","doi":"10.1080/02640410500521615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians often account for delays in detection and intervention for infant hearing loss for reasons that are rarely investigated, especially in developing countries. This study, therefore, explores current physician knowledge, attitude and training towards infant hearing loss in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Knowledge of documented risk factors, intervention options and attitude towards timely intervention for infant hearing loss was investigated through a questionnaire survey among 246 final year medical students and 161 physicians drawn from tertiary hospitals in Lagos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medical students were significantly less knowledgeable than practising physicians about most risk factors for hearing loss except for craniofacial anomalies, intra-uterine infections and low birthweight. Few respondents (11.4-42.9%) were knowledgeable about the risk of low birthweight and maternal exposure to noise in pregnancy for infant hearing loss. Medical students were significantly more aware of early detection possibility (67.8% vs 38.9 %, p=0.000) and more knowledgeable about the use of hearing aids for babies (57.3% vs 50.3%). Most respondents had a fairly positive attitude towards parental concern and early detection while medical students were significantly more positive in their attitude towards infant hearing screening (86.6% vs 74.5%, p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical students demonstrated greater awareness of early detection possibilities for infant hearing loss than physicians, although they had limited knowledge of some important risk factors. Continuing physician education reflecting evidence-based trends in child healthcare is necessary, while medical education also needs to be updated periodically.</p>","PeriodicalId":79705,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric rehabilitation","volume":"9 4","pages":"373-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02640410500521615","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician education on infant hearing loss in a developing country.\",\"authors\":\"Bolajoko O Olusanya, Alero A Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640410500521615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians often account for delays in detection and intervention for infant hearing loss for reasons that are rarely investigated, especially in developing countries. This study, therefore, explores current physician knowledge, attitude and training towards infant hearing loss in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Knowledge of documented risk factors, intervention options and attitude towards timely intervention for infant hearing loss was investigated through a questionnaire survey among 246 final year medical students and 161 physicians drawn from tertiary hospitals in Lagos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medical students were significantly less knowledgeable than practising physicians about most risk factors for hearing loss except for craniofacial anomalies, intra-uterine infections and low birthweight. Few respondents (11.4-42.9%) were knowledgeable about the risk of low birthweight and maternal exposure to noise in pregnancy for infant hearing loss. Medical students were significantly more aware of early detection possibility (67.8% vs 38.9 %, p=0.000) and more knowledgeable about the use of hearing aids for babies (57.3% vs 50.3%). Most respondents had a fairly positive attitude towards parental concern and early detection while medical students were significantly more positive in their attitude towards infant hearing screening (86.6% vs 74.5%, p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical students demonstrated greater awareness of early detection possibilities for infant hearing loss than physicians, although they had limited knowledge of some important risk factors. Continuing physician education reflecting evidence-based trends in child healthcare is necessary, while medical education also needs to be updated periodically.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"373-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02640410500521615\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500521615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500521615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
摘要
背景:医生经常解释婴儿听力损失的检测和干预延迟的原因很少调查,特别是在发展中国家。因此,本研究探讨了尼日利亚目前医生对婴儿听力损失的知识、态度和培训。方法:通过对拉各斯市三级医院246名医学生和161名医师进行问卷调查,了解婴幼儿听力损失的危险因素、干预方案及及时干预态度。结果:除颅面异常、子宫内感染和低出生体重外,医学生对大多数听力损失危险因素的了解程度明显低于执业医师。很少有受访者(11.4-42.9%)了解低出生体重和母亲在怀孕期间接触噪音对婴儿听力损失的风险。医学生对早期发现可能性的认识(67.8% vs 38.9%, p=0.000)和对婴儿助听器使用的了解(57.3% vs 50.3%)显著增加。大多数被调查者对父母关心和早期发现持相当积极的态度,而医学生对婴儿听力筛查的态度更为积极(86.6%比74.5%,p=0.002)。结论:尽管医科学生对一些重要的危险因素的了解有限,但他们对早期发现婴儿听力损失的可能性比医生有更高的认识。继续医生教育反映儿童保健循证趋势是必要的,而医学教育也需要定期更新。
Physician education on infant hearing loss in a developing country.
Background: Physicians often account for delays in detection and intervention for infant hearing loss for reasons that are rarely investigated, especially in developing countries. This study, therefore, explores current physician knowledge, attitude and training towards infant hearing loss in Nigeria.
Methods: Knowledge of documented risk factors, intervention options and attitude towards timely intervention for infant hearing loss was investigated through a questionnaire survey among 246 final year medical students and 161 physicians drawn from tertiary hospitals in Lagos.
Results: Medical students were significantly less knowledgeable than practising physicians about most risk factors for hearing loss except for craniofacial anomalies, intra-uterine infections and low birthweight. Few respondents (11.4-42.9%) were knowledgeable about the risk of low birthweight and maternal exposure to noise in pregnancy for infant hearing loss. Medical students were significantly more aware of early detection possibility (67.8% vs 38.9 %, p=0.000) and more knowledgeable about the use of hearing aids for babies (57.3% vs 50.3%). Most respondents had a fairly positive attitude towards parental concern and early detection while medical students were significantly more positive in their attitude towards infant hearing screening (86.6% vs 74.5%, p=0.002).
Conclusions: Medical students demonstrated greater awareness of early detection possibilities for infant hearing loss than physicians, although they had limited knowledge of some important risk factors. Continuing physician education reflecting evidence-based trends in child healthcare is necessary, while medical education also needs to be updated periodically.