J Schröder, M Herbort, P Rustemeyer, V Vieth, H Wassmann
{"title":"颈椎终板对轴向载荷的力学响应。","authors":"J Schröder, M Herbort, P Rustemeyer, V Vieth, H Wassmann","doi":"10.1055/s-2006-942279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>After anterior cervical discectomy the implantation of a spacer is common practice. The majority of these spacers are trapezoid titanium cages. During the development of a height-adjustable cervical implant we needed to establish the testing limits for this device. A known phenomenon is subsidence of the cage into the vertebral endplates, which leads to a decrease in height and/or angulation of the cervical spinal segment. In contrast to the thoracic and lumbar spines, there are only limited data concerning the load-bearing ability of cervical endplates. The aim of our investigation was to obtain these data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bone density of 16 cervical vertebrae was estimated by quantitative computed tomography. After embedding of the vertebrae into PMMA, each endplate was slowly compressed until failure using a metal indenter resembling the form of a newly developed cervical implant. A fixed protocol with increasing loading cycles was followed. Endpoint was breakage of the endplate as established by failure to resist the increasing loading forces produced by the testing machine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean bone density of the 16 cervical vertebrae was 204 with a standard deviation of 52 mg Ca-HA/mL (range 130-281). The endplates failed with a mean loading of 1084 N +/- 314 (range 340-1550 N). The maximum load correlates with the bone density (R2 = 0.7347). With the 97.79 mm2 load bearing surface of the cage we calculate a mean cervical endplate break strength of 10.47 MPa and a 95 % confidence interval of 12.66-9.51 MPa. An initial settling produced by resting of the anchoring teeth in the cervical endplates was observed in 8 vertebrae at a load of 113 N (range 50-250 N).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to the thoracic and lumbar spines, cervical endplates show a lower resistance against axial forces. The data are important to understand postoperative cage subsidence and to establish testing limits for the development of new implant designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50708,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie","volume":"67 4","pages":"188-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2006-942279","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical response of cervical vertebral endplates to axial loading.\",\"authors\":\"J Schröder, M Herbort, P Rustemeyer, V Vieth, H Wassmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-2006-942279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>After anterior cervical discectomy the implantation of a spacer is common practice. The majority of these spacers are trapezoid titanium cages. During the development of a height-adjustable cervical implant we needed to establish the testing limits for this device. A known phenomenon is subsidence of the cage into the vertebral endplates, which leads to a decrease in height and/or angulation of the cervical spinal segment. In contrast to the thoracic and lumbar spines, there are only limited data concerning the load-bearing ability of cervical endplates. The aim of our investigation was to obtain these data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bone density of 16 cervical vertebrae was estimated by quantitative computed tomography. After embedding of the vertebrae into PMMA, each endplate was slowly compressed until failure using a metal indenter resembling the form of a newly developed cervical implant. A fixed protocol with increasing loading cycles was followed. Endpoint was breakage of the endplate as established by failure to resist the increasing loading forces produced by the testing machine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean bone density of the 16 cervical vertebrae was 204 with a standard deviation of 52 mg Ca-HA/mL (range 130-281). The endplates failed with a mean loading of 1084 N +/- 314 (range 340-1550 N). The maximum load correlates with the bone density (R2 = 0.7347). With the 97.79 mm2 load bearing surface of the cage we calculate a mean cervical endplate break strength of 10.47 MPa and a 95 % confidence interval of 12.66-9.51 MPa. An initial settling produced by resting of the anchoring teeth in the cervical endplates was observed in 8 vertebrae at a load of 113 N (range 50-250 N).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to the thoracic and lumbar spines, cervical endplates show a lower resistance against axial forces. The data are important to understand postoperative cage subsidence and to establish testing limits for the development of new implant designs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie\",\"volume\":\"67 4\",\"pages\":\"188-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2006-942279\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-942279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2006/11/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-942279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2006/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mechanical response of cervical vertebral endplates to axial loading.
Objective: After anterior cervical discectomy the implantation of a spacer is common practice. The majority of these spacers are trapezoid titanium cages. During the development of a height-adjustable cervical implant we needed to establish the testing limits for this device. A known phenomenon is subsidence of the cage into the vertebral endplates, which leads to a decrease in height and/or angulation of the cervical spinal segment. In contrast to the thoracic and lumbar spines, there are only limited data concerning the load-bearing ability of cervical endplates. The aim of our investigation was to obtain these data.
Methods: Bone density of 16 cervical vertebrae was estimated by quantitative computed tomography. After embedding of the vertebrae into PMMA, each endplate was slowly compressed until failure using a metal indenter resembling the form of a newly developed cervical implant. A fixed protocol with increasing loading cycles was followed. Endpoint was breakage of the endplate as established by failure to resist the increasing loading forces produced by the testing machine.
Results: The mean bone density of the 16 cervical vertebrae was 204 with a standard deviation of 52 mg Ca-HA/mL (range 130-281). The endplates failed with a mean loading of 1084 N +/- 314 (range 340-1550 N). The maximum load correlates with the bone density (R2 = 0.7347). With the 97.79 mm2 load bearing surface of the cage we calculate a mean cervical endplate break strength of 10.47 MPa and a 95 % confidence interval of 12.66-9.51 MPa. An initial settling produced by resting of the anchoring teeth in the cervical endplates was observed in 8 vertebrae at a load of 113 N (range 50-250 N).
Conclusions: In contrast to the thoracic and lumbar spines, cervical endplates show a lower resistance against axial forces. The data are important to understand postoperative cage subsidence and to establish testing limits for the development of new implant designs.