是否所有机械通气的儿童患者都需要持续的血管造影?

Donna S Hamel, Ira M Cheifetz
{"title":"是否所有机械通气的儿童患者都需要持续的血管造影?","authors":"Donna S Hamel,&nbsp;Ira M Cheifetz","doi":"10.1016/j.rcc.2006.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With most patients in modern ICUs requiring mechanical ventilation, any technology that may lead to more optimal ventilatory strategies would be invaluable in the management of critically ill patients. The focus of most ventilator strategies is protecting the lung from the deleterious effects of mechanical ventilation. Every effort is made to minimize the duration of mechanical ventilation while optimizing the potential for successful extubation. A concise organized plan based on objective criteria that is adjusted to meet changes in patient status is clearly recommended. Continuous capnographic monitoring provides clinicians with clear, precise, objective data that may prove beneficial in the design and implementation of mechanical ventilatory strategies. There are no clear-cut methods for achieving the optimal ventilator strategy for a specific patient. Although guidelines and management theories exist throughout the medical literature, in practice, they often merely serve as loose guidelines. The dynamic properties of an acutely ill patient make the management of mechanical ventilation an ongoing process requiring clinical assessment and planning by multidisciplinary members of the patient care team. Comprehensive evaluation of ventilatory management strategies and patient responses must be made by a collaborative effort of physicians, respiratory care practitioners, and nurses. An objective, consistent approach to the overall management is essential. Although still controversial, it is the authors' opinion that volumetric capnograph provides the data necessary to establish adequate gas delivery, optimal PEEP, and effective ventilation with the least amount of mechanical assistance, regardless of clinician or institutional preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":79530,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care clinics of North America","volume":"12 3","pages":"501-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do all mechanically ventilated pediatric patients require continuous capnography?\",\"authors\":\"Donna S Hamel,&nbsp;Ira M Cheifetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcc.2006.05.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With most patients in modern ICUs requiring mechanical ventilation, any technology that may lead to more optimal ventilatory strategies would be invaluable in the management of critically ill patients. The focus of most ventilator strategies is protecting the lung from the deleterious effects of mechanical ventilation. Every effort is made to minimize the duration of mechanical ventilation while optimizing the potential for successful extubation. A concise organized plan based on objective criteria that is adjusted to meet changes in patient status is clearly recommended. Continuous capnographic monitoring provides clinicians with clear, precise, objective data that may prove beneficial in the design and implementation of mechanical ventilatory strategies. There are no clear-cut methods for achieving the optimal ventilator strategy for a specific patient. Although guidelines and management theories exist throughout the medical literature, in practice, they often merely serve as loose guidelines. The dynamic properties of an acutely ill patient make the management of mechanical ventilation an ongoing process requiring clinical assessment and planning by multidisciplinary members of the patient care team. Comprehensive evaluation of ventilatory management strategies and patient responses must be made by a collaborative effort of physicians, respiratory care practitioners, and nurses. An objective, consistent approach to the overall management is essential. Although still controversial, it is the authors' opinion that volumetric capnograph provides the data necessary to establish adequate gas delivery, optimal PEEP, and effective ventilation with the least amount of mechanical assistance, regardless of clinician or institutional preferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care clinics of North America\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"501-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care clinics of North America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcc.2006.05.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care clinics of North America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcc.2006.05.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

由于现代icu中的大多数患者需要机械通气,任何可能导致更优化通气策略的技术在危重患者的管理中都是无价的。大多数呼吸机策略的重点是保护肺免受机械通气的有害影响。尽一切努力尽量减少机械通气的持续时间,同时优化成功拔管的可能性。明确推荐基于客观标准的简明有组织的计划,并根据患者状况的变化进行调整。持续的血糖监测为临床医生提供了清晰、精确、客观的数据,这些数据可能有助于机械通气策略的设计和实施。没有明确的方法来实现对特定患者的最佳呼吸机策略。虽然指导方针和管理理论存在于整个医学文献中,但在实践中,它们往往只是作为松散的指导方针。急性患者的动态特性使得机械通气管理成为一个持续的过程,需要患者护理团队的多学科成员进行临床评估和规划。对通气管理策略和患者反应的综合评估必须由医生、呼吸护理从业人员和护士共同努力。对全面管理采取客观、一致的方法是必不可少的。尽管仍有争议,但作者认为容积容积容积仪提供了必要的数据,以建立足够的气体输送,最佳PEEP,以及最少机械辅助下的有效通气,而不考虑临床医生或机构的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do all mechanically ventilated pediatric patients require continuous capnography?

With most patients in modern ICUs requiring mechanical ventilation, any technology that may lead to more optimal ventilatory strategies would be invaluable in the management of critically ill patients. The focus of most ventilator strategies is protecting the lung from the deleterious effects of mechanical ventilation. Every effort is made to minimize the duration of mechanical ventilation while optimizing the potential for successful extubation. A concise organized plan based on objective criteria that is adjusted to meet changes in patient status is clearly recommended. Continuous capnographic monitoring provides clinicians with clear, precise, objective data that may prove beneficial in the design and implementation of mechanical ventilatory strategies. There are no clear-cut methods for achieving the optimal ventilator strategy for a specific patient. Although guidelines and management theories exist throughout the medical literature, in practice, they often merely serve as loose guidelines. The dynamic properties of an acutely ill patient make the management of mechanical ventilation an ongoing process requiring clinical assessment and planning by multidisciplinary members of the patient care team. Comprehensive evaluation of ventilatory management strategies and patient responses must be made by a collaborative effort of physicians, respiratory care practitioners, and nurses. An objective, consistent approach to the overall management is essential. Although still controversial, it is the authors' opinion that volumetric capnograph provides the data necessary to establish adequate gas delivery, optimal PEEP, and effective ventilation with the least amount of mechanical assistance, regardless of clinician or institutional preferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信