急性低气压热伤的处理。

Journal of burns and wounds Pub Date : 2005-03-24
Joseph A Molnar, Jordan L Simpson, Denise M Voignier, Michael J Morykwas, Louis C Argenta
{"title":"急性低气压热伤的处理。","authors":"Joseph A Molnar,&nbsp;Jordan L Simpson,&nbsp;Denise M Voignier,&nbsp;Michael J Morykwas,&nbsp;Louis C Argenta","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article reports the first application of subatmospheric pressure management to a deep, partial-thickness human thermal burn.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After cleaning the wound, the decision was made to treat the hand and distal forearm with subatmospheric pressure (V.A.C., KCI, Inc, San Antonio, Tex). The sponge was applied directly to the burned skin without additional interface at approximately 6 hours after injury. The dressing was maintained at a continuous negative pressure of 125 mm Hg over the next 40 hours, with interruption only for routine clinical evaluation at 5, 16, and 24 hours after initiation of treatment. This was accomplished by opening the dressing without completely changing it. The treatment was tolerated well by the patient, requiring no excessive pain medication. After the subatmospheric pressure treatment was stopped, the wound appeared to be of indeterminate depth and the patient was started on twice daily applications of silver sulfadiazine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical impression at this time was that the hand burn had not progressed but had stabilized and had minimal edema. He was followed as an outpatient and returned to work by 8 weeks. At approximately 4 weeks postinjury, his skin not only was functional but also appeared more normal, with less hyperemia than adjacent areas treated with topical antibacterials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present case does not prove that subatmospheric pressure treatment prevents burn wound progression. However, when combined with the previously reported laboratory studies it suggests the need for further research. Currently, a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled multicenter trial is underway to evaluate the clinical importance of these observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":87438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of burns and wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1501118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of an acute thermal injury with subatmospheric pressure.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph A Molnar,&nbsp;Jordan L Simpson,&nbsp;Denise M Voignier,&nbsp;Michael J Morykwas,&nbsp;Louis C Argenta\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article reports the first application of subatmospheric pressure management to a deep, partial-thickness human thermal burn.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After cleaning the wound, the decision was made to treat the hand and distal forearm with subatmospheric pressure (V.A.C., KCI, Inc, San Antonio, Tex). The sponge was applied directly to the burned skin without additional interface at approximately 6 hours after injury. The dressing was maintained at a continuous negative pressure of 125 mm Hg over the next 40 hours, with interruption only for routine clinical evaluation at 5, 16, and 24 hours after initiation of treatment. This was accomplished by opening the dressing without completely changing it. The treatment was tolerated well by the patient, requiring no excessive pain medication. After the subatmospheric pressure treatment was stopped, the wound appeared to be of indeterminate depth and the patient was started on twice daily applications of silver sulfadiazine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical impression at this time was that the hand burn had not progressed but had stabilized and had minimal edema. He was followed as an outpatient and returned to work by 8 weeks. At approximately 4 weeks postinjury, his skin not only was functional but also appeared more normal, with less hyperemia than adjacent areas treated with topical antibacterials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present case does not prove that subatmospheric pressure treatment prevents burn wound progression. However, when combined with the previously reported laboratory studies it suggests the need for further research. Currently, a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled multicenter trial is underway to evaluate the clinical importance of these observations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of burns and wounds\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1501118/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of burns and wounds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of burns and wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文报道了首次应用大气压管理的深度,部分厚度人体热烧伤。方法:在清洗伤口后,决定用亚大气压治疗手部和前臂远端(V.A.C, KCI, Inc, San Antonio, Tex)。在伤后约6小时,将海绵直接涂抹在烧伤皮肤上,不附加界面。在接下来的40小时内,敷料保持125毫米汞柱的持续负压,仅在治疗开始后的5、16和24小时进行常规临床评估时中断。这是通过打开敷料而不完全改变它来完成的。患者对治疗的耐受性良好,不需要过量的止痛药。在亚大气压治疗停止后,伤口出现深度不确定,患者开始每天两次应用磺胺嘧啶银。结果:此时的临床印象是手部烧伤没有进展,但已经稳定,并有最小的水肿。患者作为门诊病人随访,8周后重返工作岗位。损伤后大约4周,患者的皮肤不仅功能恢复,而且看起来更加正常,与局部抗菌药物治疗的邻近区域相比,充血较少。结论:本病例不能证明低气压治疗可防止烧伤创面进展。然而,当与先前报道的实验室研究相结合时,它表明需要进一步的研究。目前,一项前瞻性、随机、盲法、多中心对照试验正在进行中,以评估这些观察结果的临床重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Management of an acute thermal injury with subatmospheric pressure.

Management of an acute thermal injury with subatmospheric pressure.

Management of an acute thermal injury with subatmospheric pressure.

Management of an acute thermal injury with subatmospheric pressure.

Objective: This article reports the first application of subatmospheric pressure management to a deep, partial-thickness human thermal burn.

Methods: After cleaning the wound, the decision was made to treat the hand and distal forearm with subatmospheric pressure (V.A.C., KCI, Inc, San Antonio, Tex). The sponge was applied directly to the burned skin without additional interface at approximately 6 hours after injury. The dressing was maintained at a continuous negative pressure of 125 mm Hg over the next 40 hours, with interruption only for routine clinical evaluation at 5, 16, and 24 hours after initiation of treatment. This was accomplished by opening the dressing without completely changing it. The treatment was tolerated well by the patient, requiring no excessive pain medication. After the subatmospheric pressure treatment was stopped, the wound appeared to be of indeterminate depth and the patient was started on twice daily applications of silver sulfadiazine.

Results: The clinical impression at this time was that the hand burn had not progressed but had stabilized and had minimal edema. He was followed as an outpatient and returned to work by 8 weeks. At approximately 4 weeks postinjury, his skin not only was functional but also appeared more normal, with less hyperemia than adjacent areas treated with topical antibacterials.

Conclusion: The present case does not prove that subatmospheric pressure treatment prevents burn wound progression. However, when combined with the previously reported laboratory studies it suggests the need for further research. Currently, a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled multicenter trial is underway to evaluate the clinical importance of these observations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信