儿科呼吸机管理方案。

Alan S Graham, Aileen L Kirby
{"title":"儿科呼吸机管理方案。","authors":"Alan S Graham,&nbsp;Aileen L Kirby","doi":"10.1016/j.rcc.2006.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Management of mechanical ventilation is a complex process with outcomes affected by multiple patient and caregiver variable. Well-constructed protocols represent the synthesis of best available evidence regarding ventilator management. In adults, protocols improve important outcomes such as duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and complication rates; however, protocols are not uniformly successful. In pediatrics, the available evidence does not suggest that ventilator management protocols should be adopted routinely, which may be due to pediatric-specific attributes such as a generally shorter weaning duration. Evidence suggests support for protocols to carefully titrate sedation. In addition, daily assessment of SBTs improves patient outcomes and should be more uniformly adopted in pediatrics. Ventilator-related outcomes may be affected by other confounding factors such as nutrition and fluid balance. Specific subpopulations, such as children who have congenital heart disease, may present opportunities for focused use of ventilator management protocols. Protocolized ventilation has an important place in trials of new therapeutic strategies such as surfactant or proning. It is hoped that future research will further define the appropriate use of protocols in the general PICU population. Although specific protocols cannot be routinely recommended, a multidisciplinary team approach to synthesizing available literature and determining best practice is a useful model. This approach will foster \"team ownership\" of ventilator management by all involved, thus engendering the best possible outcomes for critically ill children who require mechanical ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":79530,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care clinics of North America","volume":"12 3","pages":"389-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ventilator management protocols in pediatrics.\",\"authors\":\"Alan S Graham,&nbsp;Aileen L Kirby\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcc.2006.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Management of mechanical ventilation is a complex process with outcomes affected by multiple patient and caregiver variable. Well-constructed protocols represent the synthesis of best available evidence regarding ventilator management. In adults, protocols improve important outcomes such as duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and complication rates; however, protocols are not uniformly successful. In pediatrics, the available evidence does not suggest that ventilator management protocols should be adopted routinely, which may be due to pediatric-specific attributes such as a generally shorter weaning duration. Evidence suggests support for protocols to carefully titrate sedation. In addition, daily assessment of SBTs improves patient outcomes and should be more uniformly adopted in pediatrics. Ventilator-related outcomes may be affected by other confounding factors such as nutrition and fluid balance. Specific subpopulations, such as children who have congenital heart disease, may present opportunities for focused use of ventilator management protocols. Protocolized ventilation has an important place in trials of new therapeutic strategies such as surfactant or proning. It is hoped that future research will further define the appropriate use of protocols in the general PICU population. Although specific protocols cannot be routinely recommended, a multidisciplinary team approach to synthesizing available literature and determining best practice is a useful model. This approach will foster \\\"team ownership\\\" of ventilator management by all involved, thus engendering the best possible outcomes for critically ill children who require mechanical ventilation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care clinics of North America\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"389-402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care clinics of North America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcc.2006.05.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care clinics of North America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcc.2006.05.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

机械通气的管理是一个复杂的过程,其结果受多种患者和护理人员变量的影响。构建良好的协议代表了有关呼吸机管理的最佳现有证据的综合。在成人中,方案改善了重要的结果,如机械通气持续时间、住院时间和并发症发生率;然而,协议并不总是成功的。在儿科,现有证据并不表明应常规采用呼吸机管理方案,这可能是由于儿科的特定属性,如通常较短的脱机时间。证据表明支持谨慎滴定镇静的方案。此外,每天对SBTs进行评估可以改善患者的预后,应更统一地应用于儿科。与呼吸机相关的结果可能受到其他混杂因素的影响,如营养和体液平衡。特定的亚群,如患有先天性心脏病的儿童,可能有机会集中使用呼吸机管理方案。协议化通气在新的治疗策略如表面活性剂或倾向治疗的试验中具有重要的地位。希望未来的研究将进一步确定在一般PICU人群中适当使用协议。虽然不能常规推荐具体的方案,但综合现有文献并确定最佳实践的多学科团队方法是一个有用的模型。这种方法将促进所有相关人员对呼吸机管理的“团队所有制”,从而为需要机械通气的危重儿童带来最好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ventilator management protocols in pediatrics.

Management of mechanical ventilation is a complex process with outcomes affected by multiple patient and caregiver variable. Well-constructed protocols represent the synthesis of best available evidence regarding ventilator management. In adults, protocols improve important outcomes such as duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and complication rates; however, protocols are not uniformly successful. In pediatrics, the available evidence does not suggest that ventilator management protocols should be adopted routinely, which may be due to pediatric-specific attributes such as a generally shorter weaning duration. Evidence suggests support for protocols to carefully titrate sedation. In addition, daily assessment of SBTs improves patient outcomes and should be more uniformly adopted in pediatrics. Ventilator-related outcomes may be affected by other confounding factors such as nutrition and fluid balance. Specific subpopulations, such as children who have congenital heart disease, may present opportunities for focused use of ventilator management protocols. Protocolized ventilation has an important place in trials of new therapeutic strategies such as surfactant or proning. It is hoped that future research will further define the appropriate use of protocols in the general PICU population. Although specific protocols cannot be routinely recommended, a multidisciplinary team approach to synthesizing available literature and determining best practice is a useful model. This approach will foster "team ownership" of ventilator management by all involved, thus engendering the best possible outcomes for critically ill children who require mechanical ventilation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信