Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland, Michael Lell, Evelyn Wenkel, Cathrin Böhner, Marc-Steffen Dassel, Werner Bautz
{"title":"口径测试逆转录病毒/历史分析(n=100)","authors":"Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland, Michael Lell, Evelyn Wenkel, Cathrin Böhner, Marc-Steffen Dassel, Werner Bautz","doi":"10.1016/j.rontge.2006.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>A retrospective clinical-histological study to determine the diagnostic accuracy using high-resolution digital phosphor storage plates (CR) (hardcopy) and full-field digital mammography (DR) (hardcopy) for microcalcifications and focal lesions (BI-RADS<sup>™</sup> category 4 or 5) (<em>n</em>=100).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>From 01/2004 to 06/2004, 100 patients underwent digital storage plate mammography (CR) and, after diagnosis and preoperative wire localization, full-field digital mammography (a-Se) (DR) with the same exposure parameters. Five investigators retrospectively determined the diagnosis after the operation from randomly distributed mediolateral views (hardcopy reading). These results were correlated with the final histology.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The accuracy of digital storage plate mammography (CR) and full-field digital mammography (DR) was 73% and 76% for all findings (<em>n</em>=100), 74%, 78% for microcalcifications (<em>n</em>=50) and 72%, 74% for focal lesions (<em>n</em>=50). The overall results showed no difference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings indicate equivalence of high-resolution digital phosphor storage plate mammography (CR) and full-field digital mammography (a-Se) (DR).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76505,"journal":{"name":"Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift fur radiologische Technik","volume":"56 4","pages":"Pages 129-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rontge.2006.10.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DR (a-Se) versus CR (DLR) – ist eine Verbesserung der Treffsicherheit möglich? Eine retrospektiv klinisch/histologische Analyse (n=100)\",\"authors\":\"Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland, Michael Lell, Evelyn Wenkel, Cathrin Böhner, Marc-Steffen Dassel, Werner Bautz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rontge.2006.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>A retrospective clinical-histological study to determine the diagnostic accuracy using high-resolution digital phosphor storage plates (CR) (hardcopy) and full-field digital mammography (DR) (hardcopy) for microcalcifications and focal lesions (BI-RADS<sup>™</sup> category 4 or 5) (<em>n</em>=100).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>From 01/2004 to 06/2004, 100 patients underwent digital storage plate mammography (CR) and, after diagnosis and preoperative wire localization, full-field digital mammography (a-Se) (DR) with the same exposure parameters. Five investigators retrospectively determined the diagnosis after the operation from randomly distributed mediolateral views (hardcopy reading). These results were correlated with the final histology.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The accuracy of digital storage plate mammography (CR) and full-field digital mammography (DR) was 73% and 76% for all findings (<em>n</em>=100), 74%, 78% for microcalcifications (<em>n</em>=50) and 72%, 74% for focal lesions (<em>n</em>=50). The overall results showed no difference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings indicate equivalence of high-resolution digital phosphor storage plate mammography (CR) and full-field digital mammography (a-Se) (DR).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift fur radiologische Technik\",\"volume\":\"56 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 129-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rontge.2006.10.001\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift fur radiologische Technik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0035782006000322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift fur radiologische Technik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0035782006000322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
DR (a-Se) versus CR (DLR) – ist eine Verbesserung der Treffsicherheit möglich? Eine retrospektiv klinisch/histologische Analyse (n=100)
Purpose
A retrospective clinical-histological study to determine the diagnostic accuracy using high-resolution digital phosphor storage plates (CR) (hardcopy) and full-field digital mammography (DR) (hardcopy) for microcalcifications and focal lesions (BI-RADS™ category 4 or 5) (n=100).
Materials and Methods
From 01/2004 to 06/2004, 100 patients underwent digital storage plate mammography (CR) and, after diagnosis and preoperative wire localization, full-field digital mammography (a-Se) (DR) with the same exposure parameters. Five investigators retrospectively determined the diagnosis after the operation from randomly distributed mediolateral views (hardcopy reading). These results were correlated with the final histology.
Results
The accuracy of digital storage plate mammography (CR) and full-field digital mammography (DR) was 73% and 76% for all findings (n=100), 74%, 78% for microcalcifications (n=50) and 72%, 74% for focal lesions (n=50). The overall results showed no difference.
Conclusion
Our findings indicate equivalence of high-resolution digital phosphor storage plate mammography (CR) and full-field digital mammography (a-Se) (DR).