使用一种原型If抑制剂的“纯”心率减慢的临床效果:伊伐布雷定的安慰剂对照经验。

Jeffrey S Borer
{"title":"使用一种原型If抑制剂的“纯”心率减慢的临床效果:伊伐布雷定的安慰剂对照经验。","authors":"Jeffrey S Borer","doi":"10.1159/000095428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart rate slowing is generally accepted as effective for angina prevention but this approach has not been rigorously evaluated as no pure heart rate slowing treatment has been available. With the identification of the I(f) current, the primary modulator of heart rate, and use of this as a target for drug development, the role of isolated heart rate slowing can be elucidated. More than 4,000 patients now have been studied in angina prevention trials with ivabradine, a prototype I(f) current inhibitor devoid of other cardiovascular effects. These studies demonstrate the efficacy of isolated heart rate slowing for angina prevention. Indeed, in one direct comparison with atenolol involving 939 patients, ivabradine not only was non inferior to the Beta-blocker but nominally appeared to be more efficient in angina prevention. Moreover, since ivabradine is devoid of most of the adverse effects of beta-blockers (and of calcium channel blockers), it is a suitable alternative when these established drugs are not adequately tolerated. Additional studies now must assess other potential actions in patients with coronary disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":50954,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Cardiology","volume":"43 ","pages":"54-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000095428","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical effect of 'pure' heart rate slowing with a prototype If current inhibitor: placebo-controlled experience with ivabradine.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey S Borer\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000095428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Heart rate slowing is generally accepted as effective for angina prevention but this approach has not been rigorously evaluated as no pure heart rate slowing treatment has been available. With the identification of the I(f) current, the primary modulator of heart rate, and use of this as a target for drug development, the role of isolated heart rate slowing can be elucidated. More than 4,000 patients now have been studied in angina prevention trials with ivabradine, a prototype I(f) current inhibitor devoid of other cardiovascular effects. These studies demonstrate the efficacy of isolated heart rate slowing for angina prevention. Indeed, in one direct comparison with atenolol involving 939 patients, ivabradine not only was non inferior to the Beta-blocker but nominally appeared to be more efficient in angina prevention. Moreover, since ivabradine is devoid of most of the adverse effects of beta-blockers (and of calcium channel blockers), it is a suitable alternative when these established drugs are not adequately tolerated. Additional studies now must assess other potential actions in patients with coronary disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"54-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000095428\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000095428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000095428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

减慢心率通常被认为是预防心绞痛的有效方法,但这种方法还没有经过严格的评估,因为没有纯减慢心率的治疗方法。随着I(f)电流(心率的主要调节因子)的确定,并将其作为药物开发的靶点,可以阐明孤立心率减慢的作用。目前已有4000多名患者接受了伊伐布雷定的心绞痛预防试验,这是一种无其他心血管作用的I(f)型抑制剂。这些研究证明了单独的心率减慢对预防心绞痛的有效性。事实上,在一项涉及939名患者的与阿替洛尔的直接比较中,伊伐布雷定不仅不劣于β受体阻滞剂,而且在预防心绞痛方面似乎更有效。此外,由于伊伐布雷定没有β受体阻滞剂(以及钙通道阻滞剂)的大多数副作用,因此当这些既定药物不能充分耐受时,它是一种合适的替代药物。其他的研究现在必须评估冠心病患者的其他潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical effect of 'pure' heart rate slowing with a prototype If current inhibitor: placebo-controlled experience with ivabradine.

Heart rate slowing is generally accepted as effective for angina prevention but this approach has not been rigorously evaluated as no pure heart rate slowing treatment has been available. With the identification of the I(f) current, the primary modulator of heart rate, and use of this as a target for drug development, the role of isolated heart rate slowing can be elucidated. More than 4,000 patients now have been studied in angina prevention trials with ivabradine, a prototype I(f) current inhibitor devoid of other cardiovascular effects. These studies demonstrate the efficacy of isolated heart rate slowing for angina prevention. Indeed, in one direct comparison with atenolol involving 939 patients, ivabradine not only was non inferior to the Beta-blocker but nominally appeared to be more efficient in angina prevention. Moreover, since ivabradine is devoid of most of the adverse effects of beta-blockers (and of calcium channel blockers), it is a suitable alternative when these established drugs are not adequately tolerated. Additional studies now must assess other potential actions in patients with coronary disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信