一项比较屈曲分散与锻炼计划治疗慢性腰痛的随机临床试验后的医疗保健和自我保健的数量。

Jerrilyn A Cambron, M Ram Gudavalli, Marion McGregor, James Jedlicka, Michael Keenum, Alexander J Ghanayem, Avinash G Patwardhan, Sylvia E Furner
{"title":"一项比较屈曲分散与锻炼计划治疗慢性腰痛的随机临床试验后的医疗保健和自我保健的数量。","authors":"Jerrilyn A Cambron,&nbsp;M Ram Gudavalli,&nbsp;Marion McGregor,&nbsp;James Jedlicka,&nbsp;Michael Keenum,&nbsp;Alexander J Ghanayem,&nbsp;Avinash G Patwardhan,&nbsp;Sylvia E Furner","doi":"10.1186/1746-1340-14-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous clinical trials have assessed the percentage of participants who utilized further health care after a period of conservative care for low back pain, however no chiropractic clinical trial has determined the total amount of care during this time and any differences based on assigned treatment group. The objective of this clinical trial follow-up was to assess if there was a difference in the total number of office visits for low back pain over one year after a four week clinical trial of either a form of physical therapy (Exercise Program) or a form of chiropractic care (Flexion Distraction) for chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial follow up study, 195 participants were followed for one year after a four-week period of either a form of chiropractic care (FD) or a form of physical therapy (EP). Weekly structured telephone interview questions regarded visitation of various health care practitioners and the practice of self-care for low back pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the physical therapy group demonstrated on average significantly more visits to any health care provider and to a general practitioner during the year after trial care (p < 0.05). No group differences were noted in the number of visits to a chiropractor or physical therapist. Self-care was initiated by nearly every participant in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During a one-year follow-up, participants previously randomized to physical therapy attended significantly more health care visits than those participants who received chiropractic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":87173,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","volume":"14 ","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-14-19","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amount of health care and self-care following a randomized clinical trial comparing flexion-distraction with exercise program for chronic low back pain.\",\"authors\":\"Jerrilyn A Cambron,&nbsp;M Ram Gudavalli,&nbsp;Marion McGregor,&nbsp;James Jedlicka,&nbsp;Michael Keenum,&nbsp;Alexander J Ghanayem,&nbsp;Avinash G Patwardhan,&nbsp;Sylvia E Furner\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1746-1340-14-19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous clinical trials have assessed the percentage of participants who utilized further health care after a period of conservative care for low back pain, however no chiropractic clinical trial has determined the total amount of care during this time and any differences based on assigned treatment group. The objective of this clinical trial follow-up was to assess if there was a difference in the total number of office visits for low back pain over one year after a four week clinical trial of either a form of physical therapy (Exercise Program) or a form of chiropractic care (Flexion Distraction) for chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial follow up study, 195 participants were followed for one year after a four-week period of either a form of chiropractic care (FD) or a form of physical therapy (EP). Weekly structured telephone interview questions regarded visitation of various health care practitioners and the practice of self-care for low back pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the physical therapy group demonstrated on average significantly more visits to any health care provider and to a general practitioner during the year after trial care (p < 0.05). No group differences were noted in the number of visits to a chiropractor or physical therapist. Self-care was initiated by nearly every participant in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During a one-year follow-up, participants previously randomized to physical therapy attended significantly more health care visits than those participants who received chiropractic care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chiropractic & osteopathy\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-14-19\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chiropractic & osteopathy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-14-19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-14-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

背景:以前的临床试验已经评估了在一段时间的腰痛保守治疗后接受进一步医疗护理的参与者的百分比,但是没有脊椎指压临床试验确定了这段时间的护理总量以及基于指定治疗组的任何差异。这项临床试验随访的目的是评估在对慢性腰痛进行为期四周的物理治疗(运动计划)或脊椎指压治疗(屈曲牵引)的临床试验后,一年内腰痛的总就诊次数是否有差异。方法:在这项随机临床试验随访研究中,195名参与者在接受了为期四周的脊椎指压治疗(FD)或物理治疗(EP)后接受了为期一年的随访。每周结构化的电话访谈问题涉及各种卫生保健从业人员的访问和腰痛自我护理的实践。结果:物理治疗组的参与者在试验护理后的一年内平均访问任何卫生保健提供者和全科医生的次数显著增加(p < 0.05)。在去看脊椎按摩师或物理治疗师的次数上,没有发现组间的差异。两组中几乎每个参与者都开始自我照顾。结论:在为期一年的随访中,先前随机分配到物理治疗组的参与者比接受脊椎指压治疗组的参与者参加了更多的医疗保健就诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Amount of health care and self-care following a randomized clinical trial comparing flexion-distraction with exercise program for chronic low back pain.

Amount of health care and self-care following a randomized clinical trial comparing flexion-distraction with exercise program for chronic low back pain.

Amount of health care and self-care following a randomized clinical trial comparing flexion-distraction with exercise program for chronic low back pain.

Background: Previous clinical trials have assessed the percentage of participants who utilized further health care after a period of conservative care for low back pain, however no chiropractic clinical trial has determined the total amount of care during this time and any differences based on assigned treatment group. The objective of this clinical trial follow-up was to assess if there was a difference in the total number of office visits for low back pain over one year after a four week clinical trial of either a form of physical therapy (Exercise Program) or a form of chiropractic care (Flexion Distraction) for chronic low back pain.

Methods: In this randomized clinical trial follow up study, 195 participants were followed for one year after a four-week period of either a form of chiropractic care (FD) or a form of physical therapy (EP). Weekly structured telephone interview questions regarded visitation of various health care practitioners and the practice of self-care for low back pain.

Results: Participants in the physical therapy group demonstrated on average significantly more visits to any health care provider and to a general practitioner during the year after trial care (p < 0.05). No group differences were noted in the number of visits to a chiropractor or physical therapist. Self-care was initiated by nearly every participant in both groups.

Conclusion: During a one-year follow-up, participants previously randomized to physical therapy attended significantly more health care visits than those participants who received chiropractic care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信