儒家生命伦理学与医疗保健决策中的跨文化考虑。

Su Hyun Kim
{"title":"儒家生命伦理学与医疗保健决策中的跨文化考虑。","authors":"Su Hyun Kim","doi":"10.1891/107374705780645529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article discusses the similarities and differences between Beauchamp and Childress's principlism and Confucian bioethics in terms of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. The author presents sensitive approaches for culturally diverse groups in health care areas and cautions against dichotomy in cross-cultural studies, which ignores the dynamic nature and intravariations of cultures. As a way of health care providers to become engaged in cultural diversity in nursing practice and research, the author suggests that they do not only have a general knowledge about the theoretical differences among groups through \"normative analysis\" but also learn to appreciate each individual's particular beliefs and values through narratives of morality. Health care providers as well as legal professionals need to cultivate \"cultural humility,\" which is the willingness to explore the similarities and differences between their own and each client's priorities and values and to develop courses of action with patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":85007,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing law","volume":"10 3","pages":"161-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confucian bioethics and cross-cultural considerations in health care decision-making.\",\"authors\":\"Su Hyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/107374705780645529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article discusses the similarities and differences between Beauchamp and Childress's principlism and Confucian bioethics in terms of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. The author presents sensitive approaches for culturally diverse groups in health care areas and cautions against dichotomy in cross-cultural studies, which ignores the dynamic nature and intravariations of cultures. As a way of health care providers to become engaged in cultural diversity in nursing practice and research, the author suggests that they do not only have a general knowledge about the theoretical differences among groups through \\\"normative analysis\\\" but also learn to appreciate each individual's particular beliefs and values through narratives of morality. Health care providers as well as legal professionals need to cultivate \\\"cultural humility,\\\" which is the willingness to explore the similarities and differences between their own and each client's priorities and values and to develop courses of action with patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":85007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nursing law\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"161-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nursing law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/107374705780645529\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/107374705780645529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本文讨论了波尚和柴尔德里斯的原则与儒家生命伦理学在自主、善、无害、正义等方面的异同。作者提出了对医疗保健领域中文化多样性群体的敏感方法,并警告跨文化研究中的二分法,这种二分法忽视了文化的动态性质和内部变化。作为卫生保健提供者在护理实践和研究中参与文化多样性的一种方式,作者建议他们不仅要通过“规范分析”对群体之间的理论差异有一般的了解,而且要学会通过道德叙述来欣赏每个人的特定信仰和价值观。卫生保健提供者和法律专业人员需要培养“文化谦逊”,即愿意探索自己和每个客户的优先事项和价值观之间的异同,并制定与患者一起采取行动的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Confucian bioethics and cross-cultural considerations in health care decision-making.

This article discusses the similarities and differences between Beauchamp and Childress's principlism and Confucian bioethics in terms of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. The author presents sensitive approaches for culturally diverse groups in health care areas and cautions against dichotomy in cross-cultural studies, which ignores the dynamic nature and intravariations of cultures. As a way of health care providers to become engaged in cultural diversity in nursing practice and research, the author suggests that they do not only have a general knowledge about the theoretical differences among groups through "normative analysis" but also learn to appreciate each individual's particular beliefs and values through narratives of morality. Health care providers as well as legal professionals need to cultivate "cultural humility," which is the willingness to explore the similarities and differences between their own and each client's priorities and values and to develop courses of action with patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信