呼吸气体的过滤:理论方面。

Ron J Thiessen
{"title":"呼吸气体的过滤:理论方面。","authors":"Ron J Thiessen","doi":"10.1016/j.rcc.2006.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The filtration of aerosols and the behavior of aerosolized particles are less intuitive and more complex than commonly indicated in the medical literature, but once the basic principles are presented, they are not difficult to understand or apply. Particles with diameters close to the most penetrating particle size are clearly the particles of greatest concern, interest, and value in considering the performance of different filtration devices, and this size has been identified as the standard particle size for testing respirators and breathing system filters. Although almost every level of health care now mandates the N95 (NIOSH rating) as the minimum rating for medical respirators, there is no such mandate regarding minimum efficiencies of breathing system filters. At least in North America, it still falls to each individual purchaser to ensure that these standardized tests are performed, because manufacturers adhere to these standards only on a voluntary basis. Government regulations similar to NIOSH 42 CFR 84 are needed for breathing system filters and should include a rating system such as N95, N99, or N100. For breathing system filters, the BFE and VFE tests are misleading and should be abandoned (or even better, banned) in favor of internationally recognized sodium chloride tests. Until then, manufacturers will be hesitant to abandon their BFE and VFE data, which give the appearance of vastly better performance than does the sodium chloride test.</p>","PeriodicalId":79530,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care clinics of North America","volume":"12 2","pages":"183-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Filtration of respired gases: theoretical aspects.\",\"authors\":\"Ron J Thiessen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcc.2006.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The filtration of aerosols and the behavior of aerosolized particles are less intuitive and more complex than commonly indicated in the medical literature, but once the basic principles are presented, they are not difficult to understand or apply. Particles with diameters close to the most penetrating particle size are clearly the particles of greatest concern, interest, and value in considering the performance of different filtration devices, and this size has been identified as the standard particle size for testing respirators and breathing system filters. Although almost every level of health care now mandates the N95 (NIOSH rating) as the minimum rating for medical respirators, there is no such mandate regarding minimum efficiencies of breathing system filters. At least in North America, it still falls to each individual purchaser to ensure that these standardized tests are performed, because manufacturers adhere to these standards only on a voluntary basis. Government regulations similar to NIOSH 42 CFR 84 are needed for breathing system filters and should include a rating system such as N95, N99, or N100. For breathing system filters, the BFE and VFE tests are misleading and should be abandoned (or even better, banned) in favor of internationally recognized sodium chloride tests. Until then, manufacturers will be hesitant to abandon their BFE and VFE data, which give the appearance of vastly better performance than does the sodium chloride test.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care clinics of North America\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"183-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care clinics of North America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcc.2006.03.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care clinics of North America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcc.2006.03.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

气溶胶的过滤和雾化颗粒的行为不像医学文献中通常指出的那样直观和复杂,但是一旦提出了基本原理,它们就不难理解或应用。在考虑不同过滤装置的性能时,直径接近最具穿透性粒径的颗粒显然是最受关注、最感兴趣和最具价值的颗粒,并且该尺寸已被确定为测试呼吸器和呼吸系统过滤器的标准粒径。虽然现在几乎每个级别的医疗保健都要求医用呼吸器的最低等级为N95 (NIOSH等级),但对于呼吸系统过滤器的最低效率并没有这样的规定。至少在北美,确保进行这些标准化测试的责任仍然落在每个购买者身上,因为制造商只是在自愿的基础上遵守这些标准。呼吸系统过滤器需要类似于NIOSH 42 CFR 84的政府法规,并应包括N95, N99或N100等评级系统。对于呼吸系统过滤器,BFE和VFE测试具有误导性,应该放弃(甚至更好,禁止),以支持国际公认的氯化钠测试。在此之前,制造商将不愿放弃他们的BFE和VFE数据,这两项数据显示的性能要比氯化钠测试好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Filtration of respired gases: theoretical aspects.

The filtration of aerosols and the behavior of aerosolized particles are less intuitive and more complex than commonly indicated in the medical literature, but once the basic principles are presented, they are not difficult to understand or apply. Particles with diameters close to the most penetrating particle size are clearly the particles of greatest concern, interest, and value in considering the performance of different filtration devices, and this size has been identified as the standard particle size for testing respirators and breathing system filters. Although almost every level of health care now mandates the N95 (NIOSH rating) as the minimum rating for medical respirators, there is no such mandate regarding minimum efficiencies of breathing system filters. At least in North America, it still falls to each individual purchaser to ensure that these standardized tests are performed, because manufacturers adhere to these standards only on a voluntary basis. Government regulations similar to NIOSH 42 CFR 84 are needed for breathing system filters and should include a rating system such as N95, N99, or N100. For breathing system filters, the BFE and VFE tests are misleading and should be abandoned (or even better, banned) in favor of internationally recognized sodium chloride tests. Until then, manufacturers will be hesitant to abandon their BFE and VFE data, which give the appearance of vastly better performance than does the sodium chloride test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信