处方偏差和与吸入器使用不当相关的因素。

Piersante Sestini, Vita Cappiello, Maria Aliani, Paola Martucci, Angelo Sena, Adriano Vaghi, Piero Aldo Canessa, Margherita Neri, Andrea S Melani
{"title":"处方偏差和与吸入器使用不当相关的因素。","authors":"Piersante Sestini,&nbsp;Vita Cappiello,&nbsp;Maria Aliani,&nbsp;Paola Martucci,&nbsp;Angelo Sena,&nbsp;Adriano Vaghi,&nbsp;Piero Aldo Canessa,&nbsp;Margherita Neri,&nbsp;Andrea S Melani","doi":"10.1089/jam.2006.19.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many different inhalers are available for delivering aerosol therapy in respiratory medicine. As a consequence, the prescribing physicians may have some difficulty tailoring the most suitable inhaler to each patient. This multicenter, observational study using a self-administered questionnaire analyzed the characteristics of a large sample of patients (n = 1,305; 55% females; mean age 57.4, with a range of 15-88 years; most suffering from asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) familiar with several different types of inhalers in relation to their most commonly used delivery device. Data on the inhalation technique for 2,057 observations of 1,126 patients using device-specific checklists and factors associated to misuse were also evaluated. Prevalent usage of newer dry powder inhalers (DPIs) was significantly associated with male sex, higher education, better respiratory function, and prescription from a respiratory physician. Patients using DPIs had received less instruction by health caregivers and were more likely to have read the instruction leaflet than users of metered dose inhalers (MDIs). Under these conditions, inhaler misuse was common and similar for both pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and DPIs. For both types of inhalers, misuse was significantly and equally associated to increased age, less education, and less instruction by health care personnel. We conclude that many doctors are not familiar with the relevant characteristics of currently available inhalers. The prescription of newer DPIs may be subjected to gender, socio-economic, and instruction bias. The simple change of device from the pMDI to the newer DPIs is not associated with improved inhalation technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":14878,"journal":{"name":"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine","volume":"19 2","pages":"127-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/jam.2006.19.127","citationCount":"130","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescription bias and factors associated with improper use of inhalers.\",\"authors\":\"Piersante Sestini,&nbsp;Vita Cappiello,&nbsp;Maria Aliani,&nbsp;Paola Martucci,&nbsp;Angelo Sena,&nbsp;Adriano Vaghi,&nbsp;Piero Aldo Canessa,&nbsp;Margherita Neri,&nbsp;Andrea S Melani\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jam.2006.19.127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many different inhalers are available for delivering aerosol therapy in respiratory medicine. As a consequence, the prescribing physicians may have some difficulty tailoring the most suitable inhaler to each patient. This multicenter, observational study using a self-administered questionnaire analyzed the characteristics of a large sample of patients (n = 1,305; 55% females; mean age 57.4, with a range of 15-88 years; most suffering from asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) familiar with several different types of inhalers in relation to their most commonly used delivery device. Data on the inhalation technique for 2,057 observations of 1,126 patients using device-specific checklists and factors associated to misuse were also evaluated. Prevalent usage of newer dry powder inhalers (DPIs) was significantly associated with male sex, higher education, better respiratory function, and prescription from a respiratory physician. Patients using DPIs had received less instruction by health caregivers and were more likely to have read the instruction leaflet than users of metered dose inhalers (MDIs). Under these conditions, inhaler misuse was common and similar for both pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and DPIs. For both types of inhalers, misuse was significantly and equally associated to increased age, less education, and less instruction by health care personnel. We conclude that many doctors are not familiar with the relevant characteristics of currently available inhalers. The prescription of newer DPIs may be subjected to gender, socio-economic, and instruction bias. The simple change of device from the pMDI to the newer DPIs is not associated with improved inhalation technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"127-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/jam.2006.19.127\",\"citationCount\":\"130\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jam.2006.19.127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jam.2006.19.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 130

摘要

在呼吸医学中,有许多不同的吸入器可用于提供气溶胶治疗。因此,开处方的医生可能难以为每位患者量身定制最合适的吸入器。这项多中心观察性研究采用自我管理问卷分析了大量患者样本的特征(n = 1,305;55%的女性;平均年龄57.4岁,年龄范围15 ~ 88岁;大多数患有哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患者熟悉几种不同类型的吸入器及其最常用的输送装置。使用器械特定检查表对1,126例患者的2,057次吸入技术观察数据和与误用相关的因素进行了评估。新型干粉吸入器(dpi)的普遍使用与男性、高学历、更好的呼吸功能和呼吸医生的处方显著相关。与计量吸入器(MDIs)的使用者相比,使用dpi的患者得到的卫生护理人员的指导较少,并且更有可能阅读说明书。在这些情况下,吸入器滥用是常见的,并且对于加压计量吸入器(pmdi)和dpi都是相似的。对于这两种类型的吸入器,滥用与年龄增加、教育程度低和卫生保健人员指导较少显著且同等相关。我们的结论是,许多医生不熟悉目前可用的吸入器的相关特性。新dpi的处方可能受到性别、社会经济和指导偏见的影响。从pMDI到新的dpi的简单改变与吸入技术的改善无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prescription bias and factors associated with improper use of inhalers.

Many different inhalers are available for delivering aerosol therapy in respiratory medicine. As a consequence, the prescribing physicians may have some difficulty tailoring the most suitable inhaler to each patient. This multicenter, observational study using a self-administered questionnaire analyzed the characteristics of a large sample of patients (n = 1,305; 55% females; mean age 57.4, with a range of 15-88 years; most suffering from asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) familiar with several different types of inhalers in relation to their most commonly used delivery device. Data on the inhalation technique for 2,057 observations of 1,126 patients using device-specific checklists and factors associated to misuse were also evaluated. Prevalent usage of newer dry powder inhalers (DPIs) was significantly associated with male sex, higher education, better respiratory function, and prescription from a respiratory physician. Patients using DPIs had received less instruction by health caregivers and were more likely to have read the instruction leaflet than users of metered dose inhalers (MDIs). Under these conditions, inhaler misuse was common and similar for both pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and DPIs. For both types of inhalers, misuse was significantly and equally associated to increased age, less education, and less instruction by health care personnel. We conclude that many doctors are not familiar with the relevant characteristics of currently available inhalers. The prescription of newer DPIs may be subjected to gender, socio-economic, and instruction bias. The simple change of device from the pMDI to the newer DPIs is not associated with improved inhalation technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信