来自“白人”参议院关于有毒粉尘和纳米颗粒对工作场所相关健康影响的调查的政策挑战。

Thomas A Faunce, Haydn Walters, Trevor Williams, David Bryant, Martin Jennings, Bill Musk
{"title":"来自“白人”参议院关于有毒粉尘和纳米颗粒对工作场所相关健康影响的调查的政策挑战。","authors":"Thomas A Faunce,&nbsp;Haydn Walters,&nbsp;Trevor Williams,&nbsp;David Bryant,&nbsp;Martin Jennings,&nbsp;Bill Musk","doi":"10.1186/1743-8462-3-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On 22 June 2005 the Senate of the Commonwealth of Australia voted to establish an inquiry into workplace harm related to toxic dust and emerging technologies (including nanoparticles). The inquiry became known as the \"White\" Inquiry after Mr Richard White, a financially uncompensated sufferer of industrial sandblasting-induced lung disease who was instrumental in its establishment. The \"White\" Inquiry delivered its final report and recommendations on 31 May 2006. This paper examines whether these recommendations and their implementation may provide a unique opportunity not only to modernize relevant monitoring standards and processes, but related compensation systems for disease associated with workplace-related exposure to toxic dusts. It critically analyzes the likely role of the new Australian Safety and Compensation Council (ASCC) in this area. It also considers whether recommendations related to potential workplace related harm from exposure to nanoparticles could commence a major shift in Australian healthcare regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":87170,"journal":{"name":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","volume":"3 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-3-7","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy challenges from the \\\"White\\\" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas A Faunce,&nbsp;Haydn Walters,&nbsp;Trevor Williams,&nbsp;David Bryant,&nbsp;Martin Jennings,&nbsp;Bill Musk\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1743-8462-3-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>On 22 June 2005 the Senate of the Commonwealth of Australia voted to establish an inquiry into workplace harm related to toxic dust and emerging technologies (including nanoparticles). The inquiry became known as the \\\"White\\\" Inquiry after Mr Richard White, a financially uncompensated sufferer of industrial sandblasting-induced lung disease who was instrumental in its establishment. The \\\"White\\\" Inquiry delivered its final report and recommendations on 31 May 2006. This paper examines whether these recommendations and their implementation may provide a unique opportunity not only to modernize relevant monitoring standards and processes, but related compensation systems for disease associated with workplace-related exposure to toxic dusts. It critically analyzes the likely role of the new Australian Safety and Compensation Council (ASCC) in this area. It also considers whether recommendations related to potential workplace related harm from exposure to nanoparticles could commence a major shift in Australian healthcare regulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australia and New Zealand health policy\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-3-7\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australia and New Zealand health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-3-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-3-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

2005年6月22日,澳大利亚联邦参议院投票决定对与有毒粉尘和新兴技术(包括纳米颗粒)有关的工作场所危害进行调查。这项调查被称为“怀特”调查,以理查德•怀特(Richard White)的名字命名。怀特是一名因工业喷砂引发的肺病而无法获得经济补偿的受害者,他在调查的建立过程中发挥了重要作用。“白色”调查于2006年5月31日发表最后报告及建议。本文探讨了这些建议及其实施是否可以提供一个独特的机会,不仅使相关监测标准和流程现代化,而且使与工作场所接触有毒粉尘有关的疾病的相关补偿制度现代化。它批判性地分析了新的澳大利亚安全和赔偿委员会(ASCC)在这一领域可能发挥的作用。它还考虑了与接触纳米颗粒可能造成的工作场所相关危害有关的建议是否可能开始澳大利亚医疗保健法规的重大转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles.

On 22 June 2005 the Senate of the Commonwealth of Australia voted to establish an inquiry into workplace harm related to toxic dust and emerging technologies (including nanoparticles). The inquiry became known as the "White" Inquiry after Mr Richard White, a financially uncompensated sufferer of industrial sandblasting-induced lung disease who was instrumental in its establishment. The "White" Inquiry delivered its final report and recommendations on 31 May 2006. This paper examines whether these recommendations and their implementation may provide a unique opportunity not only to modernize relevant monitoring standards and processes, but related compensation systems for disease associated with workplace-related exposure to toxic dusts. It critically analyzes the likely role of the new Australian Safety and Compensation Council (ASCC) in this area. It also considers whether recommendations related to potential workplace related harm from exposure to nanoparticles could commence a major shift in Australian healthcare regulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信